<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: A “Year of Continuous Challenge”</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:20:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: BOOMER</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19237</link> <dc:creator>BOOMER</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:23:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19237</guid> <description>It&#039;s all a sham, we could do more to hurt China than they can us. All they have on us is worthless paper becuase no way in He** will Americans stand by and watch china take control of US territory becuase of an agreement congress made with them. On the other hand we can stop importing food - resources - and jobs to china and cause rioting in the streets, we could also cut off grain and food supplies to russia and a host of other countries including wealthy middle east ones we currently supply. Oil is nice but you cant eat it. The middle east will opose iran on its own just as it did iraq when they launched skuds against Isreal and the Isrealies let it be know they were going defcon. Egypt Omahn and the others jumped on the US band wagon to prevent an Isreali strike. I have no issue selling outdated equipment to other countries - as long as it is really outdated and we no longer use it but I&#039;d prefer it not happen at all, It was really disheartening fighting enemy equiped with our gear and ammo from previous foreing sales and black markets. But I agree it will be a trying year because the world has seen a leader in doubt and a congress that cant coinside in the interest of the country.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s all a sham, we could do more to hurt China than they can us. All they have on us is worthless paper becuase no way in He** will Americans stand by and watch china take control of US territory becuase of an agreement congress made with them. On the other hand we can stop importing food — resources — and jobs to china and cause rioting in the streets, we could also cut off grain and food supplies to russia and a host of other countries including wealthy middle east ones we currently supply. Oil is nice but you cant eat it. The middle east will opose iran on its own just as it did iraq when they launched skuds against Isreal and the Isrealies let it be know they were going defcon. Egypt Omahn and the others jumped on the US band wagon to prevent an Isreali strike. I have no issue selling outdated equipment to other countries — as long as it is really outdated and we no longer use it but I’d prefer it not happen at all, It was really disheartening fighting enemy equiped with our gear and ammo from previous foreing sales and black markets. But I agree it will be a trying year because the world has seen a leader in doubt and a congress that cant coinside in the interest of the country.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John King</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19230</link> <dc:creator>John King</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:44:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19230</guid> <description>Humm, let&#039;s think about that. (1) Use Taiwan arms sales to drive the Chinese to retaliate with economic sanctions against the U.S. (2) Use that sanction to re-envigorate the U.S. economy by making more stuff here at home (textiles, toys, electronics, etc.) (3) Create 5 million new jobs in the U.S. I like it! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humm, let’s think about that.<br /> (1) Use Taiwan arms sales to drive the Chinese to retaliate with economic sanctions against the U.S.<br /> (2) Use that sanction to re-envigorate the U.S. economy by making more stuff here at home (textiles, toys, electronics, etc.)<br /> (3) Create 5 million new jobs in the U.S.<br /> I like it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19226</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:34:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19226</guid> <description>But of course, the billions going to Taiwan are small compared to the projected $40 billion plus that US foreign military sales are going to pour into the Middle East. Because there&#039;s no business like US arms business... makes those difficult policy discussions just go away. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But of course, the billions going to Taiwan are small compared to the projected $40 billion plus that US foreign military sales are going to pour into the Middle East. Because there’s no business like US arms business… makes those difficult policy discussions just go away.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19215</link> <dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:59:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19215</guid> <description>@Byron Skinner - You make an excellent argument as to why we need to deep 6 this debt culture we have in Washington and pay our way.  As the good book says, the borrower is slave to the lender.  Maybe if we got from underneath our boot we could support the ROC without fear of PRC retaliations. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Byron Skinner — You make an excellent argument as to why we need to deep 6 this debt culture we have in Washington and pay our way.  As the good book says, the borrower is slave to the lender.  Maybe if we got from underneath our boot we could support the ROC without fear of PRC retaliations.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thunder350</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19214</link> <dc:creator>Thunder350</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:31:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19214</guid> <description>Only thing is, China sees Taiwan as their territory, (as it was their territory until their civil war). We would be upset aswell if Alaska rebelled, and China supplied them with military equipment. Or like during our civil war when foreign nations helped the confederate states. :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only thing is, China sees Taiwan as their territory, (as it was their territory until their civil war). We would be upset aswell if Alaska rebelled, and China supplied them with military equipment. Or like during our civil war when foreign nations helped the confederate states. :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thunder350</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19213</link> <dc:creator>Thunder350</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:25:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19213</guid> <description>All I can say to your post is LOL. China damage the US economically? OMG whatever drugs your taking I WANT THEM! It is the US that can destroy China by cutting trade. China basically exports EVERYTHING to us. They NEED us. They wouldn&#039;t know what to do if they couldn&#039;t export their cheap, child labored, poisoned, led contaminated products to us anymore. Also I swear Japan (yea that tiny Island). Was destroying mighty China 60+ years ago until we stopped exporting oil to them. Which everyone knows followed Pearl harbor, and us entering WWII. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say to your post is LOL. China damage the US economically? OMG whatever drugs your taking I WANT THEM!</p><p>It is the US that can destroy China by cutting trade. China basically exports EVERYTHING to us. They NEED us. They wouldn’t know what to do if they couldn’t export their cheap, child labored, poisoned, led contaminated products to us anymore. Also I swear Japan (yea that tiny Island). Was destroying mighty China 60+ years ago until we stopped exporting oil to them. Which everyone knows followed Pearl harbor, and us entering WWII.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Byron Skinner</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19212</link> <dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:54:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19212</guid> <description>Good Evening Folks,Its amusing to see the responses to this post. Why any rational person would do a lousy $6 billion arms deal to a corrupt government that we don&#039;t even officially recognize is beyond  comprehension.The economic damage China could do to the US in one month would make that $6 billion look like chump change. In November China fired a shot over the US&#039;s bow when it liquidated $10 billion in treasury bill, it seems that no one was home when the message was delivered.The US economy is supported 70% by retail sales. Is the game the wingers playing here is how many days the US economy if China turned off credit to major importers like Wal-Mart?All President Obama and those peculiar institutions of winger tanks is doing here is daring the Chinese to do something. It&#039;s the Chinese here that is acting like adults, not the United States.If this reckless behavior by the United States continues it won&#039;t be a question of if, but when and what. China in a real short period of time could do enough damage to the US economy that it would be a decade or longer in recovering.On the Chinese part, hey they have know hard times for the last 3,500 years. This is called combat,  and if any of you had read any history at all you will know that the Chinese are very, very good at strangling another culture. They won&#039;t have to fire a shot.ALLONS, Byron Skinner</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Evening Folks,</p><p>Its amusing to see the responses to this post. Why any rational person would do a lousy $6 billion arms deal to a corrupt government that we don’t even officially recognize is beyond  comprehension.</p><p>The economic damage China could do to the US in one month would make that $6 billion look like chump change. In November China fired a shot over the US’s bow when it liquidated $10 billion in treasury bill, it seems that no one was home when the message was delivered.</p><p>The US economy is supported 70% by retail sales. Is the game the wingers playing here is how many days the US economy if China turned off credit to major importers like Wal-Mart?</p><p>All President Obama and those peculiar institutions of winger tanks is doing here is daring the Chinese to do something. It’s the Chinese here that is acting like adults, not the United States.</p><p>If this reckless behavior by the United States continues it won’t be a question of if, but when and what. China in a real short period of time could do enough damage to the US economy that it would be a decade or longer in recovering.</p><p>On the Chinese part, hey they have know hard times for the last 3,500 years. This is called combat,  and if any of you had read any history at all you will know that the Chinese are very, very good at strangling another culture. They won’t have to fire a shot.</p><p>ALLONS,<br /> Byron Skinner</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William C.</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19210</link> <dc:creator>William C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:28:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19210</guid> <description>Regarding the President&#039;s supposedly hostile actions towards China it is simply minor political bickering. We have swapped between selling Taiwan advanced equipment and not supplying them with any modern designs for decades now. This just appears to be a time of sales to Taiwan, China has seen this enough to know it is not some sort of plot. Taiwan isn&#039;t in any sort of position to even threaten the PRC from a military standpoint. I see no reason why we should deny this multi-billion $ deal which will undoubtedly keep many defense workers in the US from losing their jobs among other things. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the President’s supposedly hostile actions towards China it is simply minor political bickering. We have swapped between selling Taiwan advanced equipment and not supplying them with any modern designs for decades now. This just appears to be a time of sales to Taiwan, China has seen this enough to know it is not some sort of plot. Taiwan isn’t in any sort of position to even threaten the PRC from a military standpoint.</p><p>I see no reason why we should deny this multi-billion $ deal which will undoubtedly keep many defense workers in the US from losing their jobs among other things.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stephen</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19208</link> <dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:34:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19208</guid> <description>It&#039;s amusing how the US tries to pressure Russia and others about arms sales to nations the US opposes, and does this business w/ Taiwan against China&#039;s interests. Guess they figure it&#039;s worth the cost of whatever is at stake. I don&#039;t think this&#039;ll help persuade China to pressure DPRK or Iran to the extent that it can, in the interests of ratcheting down hostility towards their neighbors or the west. Of course, I&#039;m in favor of the US guaranteeing defense of Taiwan, Israel and everyone else because it&#039;s in the constitution. Unlike providing education, health and general well being of it&#039;s own citizens. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s amusing how the US tries to pressure Russia and others about arms sales to nations the US opposes, and does this business w/ Taiwan against China’s interests.</p><p>Guess they figure it’s worth the cost of whatever is at stake.</p><p>I don’t think this’ll help persuade China to pressure DPRK or Iran to the extent that it can, in the interests of ratcheting down hostility towards their neighbors or the west.</p><p>Of course, I’m in favor of the US guaranteeing defense of Taiwan, Israel and everyone else because it’s in the constitution. Unlike providing education, health and general well being of it’s own citizens.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Byron Skinner</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19206</link> <dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:53:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19206</guid> <description>Good Morning Folks,Although I have a great deal of respect for General Jones, on the issue of Taiwan he is flat out wrong. It make no sense to poke a stick at China over something that we the United States have almost zero strategic interest in. The arms deal has escalated in a couple of weeks from $1.6 to now $6 billion.There is a strong indication here is that President Obama has take personal affront to the way the Chinese greeted him on his recent trip. Now he is upping the arms race with Taiwan and kissing up to the Dali Lama and getting involved in Tibet. This is needless posturing on President Obamas part. The last thing the US needs is to get involved in a &quot;Cold War&quot; with China or a &quot;Hot War&quot; in South East Asia, again. This is not the way a President of the United States Acts, but the 9mm behavior of some body who can&#039;t get the code of the Streets of Chicago out of his psychic.ALLONS, Byron Skinner</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Folks,</p><p>Although I have a great deal of respect for General Jones, on the issue of Taiwan he is flat out wrong. It make no sense to poke a stick at China over something that we the United States have almost zero strategic interest in. The arms deal has escalated in a couple of weeks from $1.6 to now $6 billion.</p><p>There is a strong indication here is that President Obama has take personal affront to the way the Chinese greeted him on his recent trip. Now he is upping the arms race with Taiwan and kissing up to the Dali Lama and getting involved in Tibet.<br /> This is needless posturing on President Obamas part. The last thing the US needs is to get involved in a “Cold War” with China or a “Hot War” in South East Asia, again.</p><p>This is not the way a President of the United States Acts, but the 9mm behavior of some body who can’t get the code of the Streets of Chicago out of his psychic.</p><p>ALLONS,<br /> Byron Skinner</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thunder350</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19203</link> <dc:creator>Thunder350</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:29:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19203</guid> <description>I was replying to DOW with his &quot;Obama loves China, hates Taiwan&quot; speech. I support giving Taiwan military help. Tho would also like a closer partnership with China. :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was replying to DOW with his “Obama loves China, hates Taiwan” speech.</p><p>I support giving Taiwan military help. Tho would also like a closer partnership with China. :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William C.</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19199</link> <dc:creator>William C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 06:51:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19199</guid> <description>That military hardware we sell Taiwan however, despite the small numbers could be quite a deterrent if such an idea were to enter the PRC&#039;s head. Those 30 Block III AH-64D Apaches for example could do quite some damage to any armored unit the Chinese could land. Thunder350 selling that latest batch of equipment to Taiwan may have offended the Chinese somewhat, but they aren&#039;t going to cut trade with us or anything drastic. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That military hardware we sell Taiwan however, despite the small numbers could be quite a deterrent if such an idea were to enter the PRC’s head. Those 30 Block III AH-64D Apaches for example could do quite some damage to any armored unit the Chinese could land.</p><p>Thunder350 selling that latest batch of equipment to Taiwan may have offended the Chinese somewhat, but they aren’t going to cut trade with us or anything drastic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thunder350</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19187</link> <dc:creator>Thunder350</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:13:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19187</guid> <description>Too bad we just gave Taiwan alot of new military hardware, with the cost of cutting ties with China... again... (just like Bush did). </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad we just gave Taiwan alot of new military hardware, with the cost of cutting ties with China… again… (just like Bush did).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dow</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19185</link> <dc:creator>dow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:51:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19185</guid> <description>barry has a multiple of  Mao followers in the Admin and barry himself was raised by a Communist, Barry obama and the Chicomms are fellow travelers.  OF course they are &quot;friends&quot; Pray for Taiwan..... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>barry has a multiple of  Mao followers in the Admin and barry himself was raised by a Communist, Barry obama and the Chicomms are fellow travelers.  OF course they are “friends”</p><p>Pray for Taiwan.….</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: @E_L_P</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/29/a-year-of-continuous-challenge/#comment-19173</link> <dc:creator>@E_L_P</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:15:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12677#comment-19173</guid> <description>&#8220;What we announce or don&#8217;t announce will not come as a surprise to our Chinese friends&#8221; Of course. The U.S. is in debt to the Chicoms big time to the trillions. Want to sell arms to Taiwan? Better get it cleared with the communists. Meet with the Dalai Lama? Ditto. I forget. Are we allowed to pay back the communists using clunkers? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“What we announce or don’t announce will not come as a surprise to our Chinese friends”</p><p>Of course. The U.S. is in debt to the Chicoms big time to the trillions. Want to sell arms to Taiwan? Better get it cleared with the communists. Meet with the Dalai Lama? Ditto. I forget. Are we allowed to pay back the communists using clunkers?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using apc
Object Caching 761/762 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 09:37:38 -->
