Obama Switches DoD Succession

Obama Switches DoD Succession

President Barack Obama issued an executive order this week changing the line of succession at the Defense Department, reversing changes made by the Bush administration in 2005.

The deputy secretary of defense remains the immediate successor if the secretary of defense is unable to perform his duties, but the March 1 executive order reinstates the three service secretaries – Army, Navy and Air Force, in that order – as next in line.

The Pentagon did not return Military​.com’s calls for comment on the change, but a White House official said the “transition back to the historical order of succession” was recommended by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates following a review.


Now, if Gates and his deputy, William Lynn, were unable to fulfill their duties, Secretary of the Army John McHugh would become acting secretary of defense.

When President George W. Bush issued his order, Donald Rumsfeld was defense secretary and the deputy position – his next in line – was vacant. Bush’s order dropped the service secretaries several places down on the list, replacing them, respectively, by the undersecretaries of defense for intelligence, policy and acquisition, according to Executive Order 13394.

The Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence at the time was Stephen Cambone; the undersecretary for policy was Eric Edelman; and the undersecretary for acquisitions was Kenneth Kreig.

According to the December 2005 Associated Press story on the change, the three were all considered Rumsfeld loyalists and all had previously worked for Vice President Dick Cheney when he was defense secretary under President George H.W. Bush.

Bryan Whitman told The Associated Press in 2005 that the changes were recommended by the Pentagon because the three undersecretaries have “a broad knowledge and perspective of overall [DoD] operations,” while the service leaders have a more narrow focus.

But Thomas Donnelly, director of the Center for Defense Studies at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, said the changes were designed to give the administration greater political control over the DoD while devaluing the services as institutions.

According to a search of the executive orders revoked with each revision, the line was routinely re-established under each president dating back to Ronald Reagan. Reagan’s order, however, referred back to one signed by Dwight D. Eisenhower and which also was linked to a secretary named Gates.

On May 18, 1959 Eisenhower issued an order naming Thomas S. Gates – his Navy secretary – to be acting defense secretary. Gates served in the job until the end of Eisenhower’s term in January 1961, according to The American Presidency Project.

Join the Conversation

“…reversing changes made by the Bush administration …”

Something we’re going to see a lot of over the next three years, god willing.

I am scared how many changes Obratma is going to make

Obama should be worried about how he’s going to pay for everything. At the rate he’s going, we wont have a Department of anything in the next three years.

Hahaha funny Bush is the that spent too much

You better learn Chinese as they own us now and we have become there servant. The borrower is servant to the lender!

And Obama’s is better so far? I think not.

Well, this is the first change made by the CIC that I actually agree with. The DOD line of ascension/succession should be left within the DOD. Hell, I think we should make some old crusty retired E-9 the Secretary of Defense in the event the entire DOD cabinet is lost. That would make me happy.

bush was there for 8 years and ran up most of current debt and won nothing.
obama’s there 14 months. yeah i guess bush is better.

if bo invented a cure for CANCER the republicans would be FOR CANCER.

Thank God Bush’s orders are easily changed. What a piece of crap presidency that was!!!

How quaint and quick we are to be judgmental and call anything crap. For example, the standards of public education are in a sad state of affairs. If any compliments or criticisms are made without justification, your just complaining.

I see a lot of Liberal intelligence here. Let’s give you a civic, not the car, lesson. The President submits a budget to congress and congress passes it. So let look at it this way, Obama was in Congress, the Democratic had control of the House and Senate so they passed their own budget agenda. Now Obama is the President and he is blaming Bush. You have to look to Reid, Pelosi and Obama to the problems with the spending. Getting tired of the Bush bashing when Obama has run up more debt in less than a year in office and not to mention the Democrats causing the housing and financial crisis and the high unemployment that just happened.

How can you respect a man that while running for office visits military personnel in Afghanistan, and wouldn’t shake the hands or speak to the regular non high ranking mlitary personnel that were there to greet him. It’s plain and simple, miltary personnel should be ran by military personnel that are on active duty. No retirees. If you still want to be in service, then you shouldn’t have gotten out. If the President wants to make changes, he should simply do this, get the politicians and the press the hell out of the middle east, let us grunts do our jobs, and go ahead and end this war. And to all the baby loving, tree hugging liberals out there, get over your self, bite your tongue, and let our boys come home for good.

As a veteran I always respected the commander and Chief no matter what, I always supported thier decisions, With Obama this is not the case I have and continue to have no respect for this guy he gave this country away when he started to apologize for our ( Veterans ) actions in past wars. Shame on this jerk.

This only shows just how unwise this president really is. It’s true that president bush deserved criticism on a whole range of issues, but not everything he did was bad. His anti terror policies did help to keep us safe since the 9–11 attacks. I believe this reshuffling the chain of command at the pentagon simply undo president bush’s foot print, is assenine. There’s no practicality to it whatsoever.

Who the heck KNOWS ANYTHING– really — of what’s going on? Not one fact here or VIA TV/Radio…even tried “The Economist”…noooo…My god-child has it…“no more monkeys, jumping on the bed!”

Bush was the biggest spender in history. As a matter of fact all the recent repbulican presidents under a multitude of congresses added more to the debt than the Democrate Presidents. It was Clinton that reversed the trend, while simultaneously giving some of the largest pay raises in history to military personnel. Arguing that it was a Democratic Congress that caused the spending is sophmoric, when the congress tried to pull back on spending they were accused of “Not supporting the troops.” With the exception of health care which is riddled with misrepresentations of the total cost from both democrats and republicans, the bulk of spending that is occuring under Obama is merely a continuation of policies set forth by Bush. While there was alternatives to some of the Bush policies, economic bailout etc., once you commit to a path it can be more detrimental to change direction than to follow through. If you are a Bush supporter then you can look at the current spending as support for the direction Bush took, I ceratinly would not agree but it is a fair interpretation. Either way they both spent the money to argue that it is justified for Bush but not Obama is dishonest.

Gotta love the revisionist history where Clinton is a great president…

Dems had control of Congress for less than half a term during the Bush years. Reps had a super-majority the rest of the time, and even changed the rules so that the minority couldn’t even get a say at all. Now the tables are turned, the Reps are screaming foul. What is foul is the odor of the eight years prior.

MMG

This President has diminished our international command presence, the Iranian leadership mocks us, the North Koreans feel secure enough to proceed with their intercontinental ballistic missle program, and I’m curious if the Jewish vote in Florida is having buyers remorse and while the country is gripped in the throes of the deepest recession since the Great Drepression, the President is wasting valuable time and energy on health care reform! And oh, I forgot to mention that the insurgency in Iraq are bidding their time until are soldiers leave, we gave a date, remember? People are already talking about him being a one term President, and he’s only been in office 13 months! This is not a Republican conspiracy, this President is doing this all by himself, he doesn’t need any help he’s doing just fine! By the way, I understand that there is a possibility that the Administration will not shut down Guantanamo and will authorize military tribunals for the fiercest terrorist. What a novel idea, but then this Liberal Ideologue President did campaign on the theme of “Hope and Change”, and I meant to ask everyone, “How’s that working out for Ya?”

Hey Craig Maybe you should wake up and get your facts straight, clinton closed more military bases than any president in history. He also allowed the sale of government land with ocean access to the Chinese who last I heard are Communists.The weapons used in the “famous” gun battle bank hiest came from that “communist base” land your beloved adulterating President Clinton sold, also he only gave a minimal raise after public outcry you fool​.By closing those bases he not only reduced our forces but he also destroyed the income of the surrounding communities you boxed headed moron. So go find out the truth before you spew you lies and redirick on this site again you commy peace of crap

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement