Oil Spill: Where is the Coastie Debate?

Oil Spill: Where is the Coastie Debate?

The Coast Guard needs money. At a time when the service is due to whack 1,100 uniform positions and drop some missions, it must manage the government response to the Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill, pursue drug traffickers, rescue fishermen and sailors, guard our nation’s coasts and enforce all those fishing and environmental regulations. International defense consultant Robbin Laird, who has been working Coast Guard issues for some time, argues that one very apt place to pull funding for the Coast Guard’s environmental and emergency responses is the Minerals Management Service, the federal body that licenses offshore drilling. The MMA generates about $13 billion each year working with oil companies to develop oil and natural gas fields. Stop pointing fingers, Laird says, and do something.

In scenes that would make our ancestors from the 1890s proud, populist Washington is finger pointing at anyone and everyone who might be responsible for the crisis caused by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Congress is having hearings on whom to blame and we are even getting entertaining presentations from politicians on the technical issues of oil drilling and safety.

What we are not having is an adult conversation about the ways to improve the safety and security of the deep-sea drilling enterprise and, more to the point, ways to shape a more effective public-private partnership in managing the challenges of deep sea offshore drilling. What we need to focus upon is how to enhance public sector capabilities and to shape more effective dialogue with the private sector leading to more effective stewardship.


The private sector is where the investment will come from for developing the offshore oil and gas fields. The private sector is where the tools for oil drilling are going to come from. The private sector is where the oil will be refined and delivered to support economic growth and development. The government will do none of this; rather it will tax the revenues.

Nonetheless, the public sector needs to be better-resourced and more effective in providing oversight and stewardship. Without effective public stewardship, there will be a significant downturn in offshore drilling and in the investment in such capabilities and activities. Both the public and private sector need more effective public stewardship. But we will not get that from a populist finger-pointing circus.

When there is a crisis, the Coast Guard and other agencies can dip into emergency funds. Why not create a fund, which the Coast Guard and other federal agencies can use to fund the equipment, and manpower necessary to provide for better stewardship? Instead of reactive disaster management, why not fund the Coast Guard so it can have the capabilities it needs before disaster strikes? Rather than cutting Coast Guard funding or toying with handing Coastie functions to the Navy, which has no domain competence in managing stewardship activities, the Obama administration should end the cuts it has in train, including the rather shocking elimination of some of the Coast Guard’s catastrophic spill equipment.

The administration is going to reform the Minerals Management Service, the federal agency responsible for licensing offshore drilling. The agency is going to be split so that the revenue receiving side and the regulatory side are separate and this is being done to ensure that the risk of conflict of interest goes down.

A more fundamental question is how competent is the agency in having knowledgeable maritime trained folks to provide oversight to a very different sort of oil enterprise? And how might the Coast Guard be more effectively resourced in working with the Minerals Management Agency so that oversight and preparation for disaster intervention is fully resourced and staffed?

And we do not have to be abstract about this. The eighth USCG district at the heart of providing for Gulf oil security and stewardship. According to a senior USCG official in the district, “within this region there is 6,500 oil and gas wells; 4,000 oil or gas production platforms and over 800 of which have full-time crew support. There are 116 Mobile offshore drilling units 51 of which are stacked, some which are crude and some are not. There are 30,000 workers offshore on any given day. This infrastructure accounts for 30 percent of our domestically produced oil and 23 percent of our domestically produced natural gas.

And the challenges will be growing. Another senior official underscored the deep offshore oil and gas enterprise. “The companies are going to be drilling and working so much farther offshore and deeper; the offshore energy sector is a huge game changer field technology-wise and what they’re doing now it pales in comparison two years ago. They’re not only going 10,000 feet deep; they’re also drilling deeper than before.”

We need to shape a public discussion of the needs of the Coast Guard and other agencies to make this sector work more effectively. We need to fund more effectively the public partners to the effort, and we could focus on funding more capabilities for the MMS and the Coast Guard out of the funds generated from offshore drilling. And we need to do this now because we are going deeper and farther than before, and we need to shape knowledge structures and other tool sets which would allow us to be more effective moving forward with a more effective public-private partnership.

Robbin Laird is an international defense consultant and co-founder of Second Line of Defense, a website which focuses on logistics, sustainment and concepts of operations.

Join the Conversation

Got SystAdmin? These repeat crises is killing us and we aren’t getting better at it.

Thanks Steve! I’m doing my final paper for class on this oil spill.

There is plenty of money available but the moron in the white house is giving it away. He is paying back the groups that supported his buying the white house. Those groups include almost every union in the USA, George Soros is receiving money through oil in Brazil, ACORN, Black Panthers and many others. Why would this arab want to support the military when he hates our military and the USA? In November get rid of all of the congress members up for election and weaken this Marxist so he can not screw the citizens of our once great country anymore.

Good Evening Folks,

As of June 1st. this type of a problem will be out of the jurisdiction of the UGCG. This according to the reorganization of DHF witch cut the 1,100 Coast Guards men/women will come under FEMA’s jurisdictional control.

The where’s Waldo question, where is FEMA?

As for the MMS. its head bailed over the weekend, what a surprise, and it is basically doing the best it can do best, nothing. The MMS will disappear, that’s a no brainer and the regulation will come under the Department of the Interior which is highly infiltrated by knuckle headed conservative activists.

To the Stares of the Gulf from Southern California, 40 years after Santa Barbara, we still are getting tar balls on the beaches and our maritime and fishing industries are a fading memory. Welcome to big oil.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Byron,
Our world’s fisheries are fished out because we let mainly Japanese trawlers the size of small ocean liners take all the fish they want rather than making them import more grains and meats. They also use lots of fisfh for fertiliers. I believe the catch of most large sized fish (sharks, blue fin tuna, marlins, etc.) is down to only 40% of what it was 20 years ago. It has nothing to do with Big Oil, which is only to get bigger because while we don’t like what’s happening in the Gulf, we can’t bring soccer moms and ourselves to selling our gas gussling cars and SUVs, we don’t like public transportation, and the ownership society is burning trough fossil fuels without regard for saving something for our children. Since the last estimates I saw said we would burn through the known reserves of oil in about 40 years, we won’t have this problem in the future!

Forty years ago they said we only had forty years of oil left. I’m not sure anyone really knows what left.

Each year the mission of the Coast Guard has been increased without any thought of increasing man-power or the budget of the Coast Guard It should be noted that there are approximately 35,000 men and women in the active Coast Guard and 17,500 in the Coast Guard Reserves. In the next two years the number of men and women serving on active duty will be cut three percent (1775 men and women) and the budget will be cut 175 millon dollars.

One thing I can remenber druring my 26 years of service is being told to “do more with less”. I can remember not having the money for week end drills four months out of the year and cannibalising ships and boats because we didn’t have the money buy parts. The ship I served on was 39 years old when I left it. Nothing has changed. Every time the buget needs to be cut, the Coast Guard buget is cut. Today the Coast Guard men men and women are still serving on ships and aircraft which should be retired due to age. Yet, they are are asked to do “more with less”. Instead of cutting the buget and manpower, it is time the buget should be increased. It is time for the manpower to be increased. Old ships and aircraft should be replaced in a time of ever increasing missions placed on the Coast Guard.

There are only approximately 8,000 members of the Coast Guard Reserve.

The Coast Guard would ask for more money if not for the “evil empire” than constrains them — also known as the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which doesn’t allow agencies and departments to submit what they need and then start a discussion of what they get. Current practice is submit a budget proposal to a predetermined amount and limit discussion with Congress to that arbitrarily set amount. The President never knows what in any individual budget. It doesn’t make a different whether a Republican or Democrat is in the White House, OMB tell him what he is supposed to approve. That’s why we get into these messes.

I seved in the Coast Guard AND worked offshore on the rigs so I have seen both sides of it. MMS is a joke, each inspector is assigned a section of the gulf to watch over and inspects rigs in his sector, when we heard an inspector was coming out for a supposed suprise inspection (we always knew ahead of time), depending on what sector of the gulf we were in we knew what he was looking for. One inspector only looked at paper work and never left the living quarters, another would go up to the drill floor and look for dead ended wires and rusted explosion proof junction boxes but never checked the drillers log or equipment test reports. Most of the inspectors had no idea what they were supposed to be looking at or how the equipment was supposed to work.
If you read Coast Guard regulations and compare them to MMS rules, they don’t match, in some cases the two contradict each other so no matter what you do you aren’t in compliance so we kept things up to match the one that would generate the largest fine or shut us down and just hoped the other guy didn’t catch us.

Environmental issues should not be a mission of the USCG. Their mission is the protection of the Coasts, drug interdiction and Maritime and Navigational issues. Oil spills and such should be handled by civil authority.

Good Morning Folks,

To taxpayer. If you read my post you will see that I was referring to a local event, and yes it was caused by big oil, not the Japanese. The don’t fish on the California shel which off most of Southern California is from 2–5 miles deep. Also before you get all worked up my personal opinion is that the local Southern California commercial fishing industry could have survived the Federal Regulation that came in starting in 1990. That was when President Bush (41) sold out to international fishing interest, restricted US fishing while ignoring Chinese/Russian/Korean/Japanese etc large scale open ocean operations. which an investment group that he was/has been in since leaving office had invested in and made some nice profits. Oh yes, former President and Mrs. Clinton are also in this investment group.

I have no problem with the environmentalist argument that local natural stock could not keep up with the pressures of the increasing demand for sea food by consumers and marine life’s other industrial uses. History has sown that the industry was doomed by forces that nature had no control of.

I do maintain that the basic chemical make up of the waters off the Southern California coast changed because of the spill in 1969, and that is the over riding reason that the kelp is disappearing, and that aqua-farming has been commercially unsuccessful in these waters.

Then of course there are the tar balls on the beaches that still effect out tourist industry after 40 years. Not body want to take a sunset walk along the tidal area of a beach and then have to scrape tar off the bottoms of their feet. Nasty, stuff.

ALLONS
Byron Skinner

The Coast Guard and Reserve will have to rely more on the all Volunteer Coast Guard Auxiliary to fulfill inland rivers and lakes stewardship which will allow the active forces to tackle more DHS events as they arise.

That may be true but the CG’s budget has more than doubled this decade.

There is a fund specifically designed for an oil spill. It’s called the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund and it resides with the USCG.http://​www​.uscg​.mil/​n​p​f​c​/​A​b​o​u​t​_​N​P​F​C​/​o​s​l​t​f​.​asp. The Federal On Scene Coordinator (FOSC) can use this fund for immediate response efforts. Of course, responsible party must repay all the costs for response efforts.

What a whack job!
I’m not refering to our president either

I have a son who is currently serving in the USCG and resides down on the Gulf. I have followed this entire budget discussion now and it makes me sick. My question is this? WHAT can we do to help the Coasties? I have seen all kinds of message boards and people commenting but where does action begin? I am willing…I hve already written a couple of State Representatives but everyone knows the vital role our Coasites play. As someone above stated “environmental issues should not belong to the Coast Guard”. Great…who do we propose serve to rescue and protect those 30,000 workers on the rigs?

And that’s still not enough to cover the replacement of the severely outdated ships/aircraft/IT systems. The USCG’s missions have not gotten smaller, in fact, w/things like the Haiti earthquake and the oil spill they have had to use their already underfunded budget to help w/those unplanned, major emergencies. The USCG sorely needs a budget increase to help modernize the Service and increase manpower to keep up with the mission set.

RE: The Japanese don’t fish off California! I have caught a few with Maru at the end of the name, and a couple were confiscated — one notable one for butchering dolphin (the mammal not the fish) while we were flying overhead snapping pictures. They caught that long-lining offf Monterey and Pelagic harvesting sea mammals (shooting.) Of Course that was the mid 1970’s — but after I bought a house in Grate’s Cove Newfoundland, I watched them Cod Fish under the World Order agreement that Canada has bought into (the one that Obama and Gore are trying to sell you) that gives the Newfies no right to their own Cod or salmon. This town has had a fishery for over 400 years of English speaking peoples. To even catch a Salmon on land in a stream and be caught with it is a $5,000cad fine in that area, because they belong to the Japanese and have just come in to spawn and die. The way they cod fish, the Newfies long-lined and pole fished; is to trawl the ocean floor. They are destroying the beds that are the most lucrative spawning area of the world for sea creatures of every king. This has all but shut down towns that have been active fishing villages that have been there since the 1600s and were still extremely active. But the Japanese are destroying the crab nesting sites and everything else by trawling the floor for fish. According to the new World Order if we were to sign on to it the gulf oil would belong to Europe or Russia anyway and not us — just ask any Canadian how it feels, or any European. It transfers Commodities from of one rich Country to a country that NEEDS them more. I have seen it. The town in Newfoundland where I had a home, Grates Cove, was where Henry Cabot landed, and where Christopher Columbus sighted marked on his map, our point not the town, when he surveyed the Arctic after discovering the Dominican Republic in 1492. Excuse me, I don’t want to excuse anyone who went to an American School — America in 1492.

The Monterrey incident — yes that was in the National Park.

I served 5 years in the coast Guard from 86 to 91. Even then we were always asked to do more with less and just make it happen was a popular saying.WE had to watch how much we patrolled so we would have enough fuel money to do search and rescue. Money for fuel was always an issue and fixing or replacing things came after we got fuel.I remember when we would go to the Coast Guard Base the Skipper would say this is a list of things we need. Go out a recon them, which meant beg, barrow, trade barter dicker and aquire it, Period.
One of the first ships I served on was commissioned in 1942. We spent over a year in the ship yards getting it up to date and sea worthy. It coat will over a Million dollars. Are we finished the job we went to sea for sea trails. When we got back they told us they where decommissioning our great ship. that we all poured our heart and souls into. What a big waist of time and money that was.The Coast Guard was always last on the list when it came time to dole out money for budgets. They have a huge mission for the amount of people and ships they have. Gunners Mate second Class

So much for globalization and its discontents. Canada is an absolutely beautiful country. My wife and I especially love Peggy’s Cove and Vancover. My stepfather shipped out of Halifax as a young merchant marine and was torpedoed twice in the North Atlantic by Nazi U-boats. So here are my suggestions to stop the Japanese from destroying Mother Earth. Option 1: Regardless of how you feel about them, STOP buying Toyotas and Hondas, and make that effort very public. Option 2: Canada has a Navy and its ships have weapons on them.

This is a great article and I wish some senior decision policy makers in the government could read it. I currently serve in the Coast Guard, but environmental response is not my specialty — LE, HLS, and small boat management is.

I think a key point made in the article is that private industry is the driver to prevent something like this from happening again, not more government regulation (it’s already ineffective in this area and in most other areas in our lives). As tragic as this event was for both the lives lost (primary importance that isn’t talked about much) and the environmental impact, the good thing that will come out of this event is that there will be some entrepreneur who will figure out tools, techniques and procedures to respond to this type of event whether it be some type of new clamping device or otherwise. However, in my opinion, if the government decides to do what it does best — overregulate to make it look like they are doing something — this will discourage entrepreneurship. After all, no one wants to enter a business where the regulations stifles innovation and reduces profit potential. After all, we are still a capitalistic society and people are in business to make a profit — it isn’t a bad thing (corruption and greed seen by some businessmen is though).

As far as the budget cuts go, I obviously disagree with them. I recently served in Houston and was amazed at how little money there was to do anything — whether it was for purchasing protective gear for our boat crews, buying equipment such as IONSCAN devices to help LE teams, or fixing our facilities — we didn’t have nearly enough for even the necessities. With the CG as a whole, a significant portion of our budget goes to the new cutters coming online, which are necessary. However, money going there precludes money going to another need…unless someone in Congress has an epiphany.

Semper Paratus

I have only been in the Coast Guard for three years so far, but even in that short time I have noticed the problem.

I am currently on a ship that was bought used from the Navy in 1999. It was orginally commisioned in 1971. There were three made, one is at the bottom of the ocean, one is in the Smithsonian, and the other is operating in the Bering Sea. At this moment, we are the ONLY cutter from this port capable of going underway and conducting missions ranging from SAR (Search and Rescue) to Fishery Enforcement. The other two cutters either A: Have no propulsion, or B: does not have the capability to produce water at sea (essential for long deployments).

That is the state of the cutters here…operating in the Bering Sea, the world’s biggest and harshest fishery area.

The Coast Guard NEEDS more money. Letting people go will not fix the problem. I don’t have money to buy LE gear…simple items of nescesity like holsters and flashlights.

Don’t even get me started on the cost of ammunition and how that effects training.

–Mini Gunz

The Coast Guard has been involved with environmental protection since the Coast Guard has been around. It’s actually what I do in the coast guard, and I enjoy it. I have to disagree with leaving pollution up to civil authorities, because well; we’re good at it. Everything that’s happening all boils down to policy. Maybe what needs to happen is a phsycological evalution should be conducted on all those planning on running for office. To many of them are making decisions based on what they think needs to happen without having any knowledge themselves about the specific topic. But I digress.

USCGGM, think about OPSEC before you post.

Due to your super specific posting, I’ve decided that you’re on the Alex Haley.

There is not a member of the U.S. Coast Guard, both past and present that does not know this same song!
We have been adapting and overcoming equipment and funding shotfalls for so long it seems that we are a
secret psyops experiment to see how long we can take it without going crazy! Maybe we have tilted, for taking this crap for so long, but our focus is never on ourselves, it is always on the needs of those who will be helped by no one else but us!

We do not function well as aggressive budget hounds and comply very well with mission creep without funding. You can kill the U.S. Coast Guard slowly or by a more immediate route but the result will be the same.. An irreplacable asset will be gone with the expertise and flexibility unmatched by Navy assets. Maybe this is sign of the future of the United States position in the world? While we are at it we might get rid of Special Forces Command, Joint Force Doctrine, the Navy submarine force, the Marine Corps, the Air Force officer corps and every other Army command except Northcom!

If any of you think we can benefit from this scenario, then just keep quiet about the destruction of the U.S. Coast Guard!

With terrorists crossing the southern border in droves (see world net daily .com), the USCG, Customs, Immigration/Border Patrol should not be cut.…they should have their size tripled! The current administration is only going to weaken the military so they can pay for their social programs that they hope will get them votes and allow them to stay in office. Then they can finish turning the U.S. into a socialist/communist country.

shouldn’t the companies that build set and maintain the rigs have the primary responsibilty to maintain,inspect,preventabile measures,etc. I am 57 years old and greed is driving the world to a scary place. When I was a kid it seemed like people and the natural enviroment was important, not so anymore. Oh well as a saying I have heard and used,“technology will eventually put us back to the cave” seem to be happening at a higher reat than I expected. It just awes me that there were not methods in place to quickly deal with this oil spill. How about someone out there actually thinking ahead far enough to handle thes problems instead of just concentrating on the “next dollar”. God created us and gave us the privilage to be the rulers of our planet, My oh my how disappointed He must be.

I also do pollution investigations for the USCG. The main reason it can’t be handled by another agency other than the EPA or the CG is because no one else has the authority or ability. Those two agencies are able to go on facilities and foreign vessels that have a spill. Unfortunately with the state run agencies or a ‘civil authority’ if the vessel or facility says no,we don’t want you here; that’s it, they can’t be there. And if that agency chooses to try and throw their weight around and go anyway it is a breach of security. In that case, the CG is going to show up anyway.

Patricio May 18th, 2010 said:
There is plenty of money available but the moron in the white house is giving it away. He is paying back the groups that supported his buying the white house. Those groups include almost every union in the USA, George Soros is receiving money through oil in Brazil, ACORN, Black Panthers and many others. Why would this arab want to support the military when he hates our military and the USA? In November get rid of all of the congress members up for election and weaken this Marxist so he can not screw the citizens of our once great country anymore.

You, sir, sound much like an idiot with a bouquet of FOX news parrot blended with a heavy fragrance of the finest bovine waste, and rich explosions of right-wing lunacy which have no place in this thread.

Thanks to Robbin Laird — one of really great defense intellectuals, and has been for years, for getting the ball rolling on a very interesting and informative discussion.

OPSEC man OPSEC… We can make water now.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement