India Seeks 6 Subs, $11B

India Seeks 6 Subs, $11B

India’s Defense Minister A. K. Antony approved a new line of submarines — Project 75(I) — to be constructed in India at a cost of $11 billion. Our colleague Manu Sood, editor of the Indian defense website 8ak​.in, interviewed Bhupinder Yadav, who heads a small group of retired ex-servicemen at a defense and aerospace consulting company, Q-tech Synergy, to learn more.

8ak: How many submarines do the Indian Navy plan to have?

Yadav: The Indian Navy proposes to have a mix of twenty-four nuclear and conventional submarines of the SSK type. With six Scorpene and a further six Project-75(I) , the remaining 12 subs will be of an indigenous design.


The Indian navy is also planning to build micro-submarines for its strategic operations. An RFP was issued in Nov 2009 to Indian shipyards including Hindustan Shipyards Limited, ABG and Pipavav shipyards, Larsen & Toubro and state-owned Mazagon Docks Limited (MDL). Indian Navy is planning to get five of these vessels at a cost of about $80 million but the inductions can be doubled later on.

8ak: Why is the price almost US$2 billion per submarine whereas strategypage reports US$350 for an AIP submarine?

Yadav: The 2005, Scorpene diesel submarines deal was signed, with an option for six more and extensive technology transfer agreements was reported as being in excess of $4 billion. The Proj 75(I) is a $10.7  billion project for building six vessels. These will be new submarines and not the Scorpene, and it will be a bigger submarine with specific features with key differentiator being a new class of missiles, having some features from the HDW Type 214, the Russian Amur class, the Italian Fincantieri  S-1000 in collaboration with Rubin of Russia. The extra cost could be for the new design that will allow the incorporation of future technologies, stealth features, missiles, transfer of technology, Air Independent Propulsion (AIP) and land attack capabilities.

8ak: Why did India not go in for a nuclear submarine instead of diesel electric?

Yadav: The utility of conventional diesel-electric submarines with the introduction of AIP (air-independent propulsion) systems like the French company DCNS’ MESMA (Module d’Energie Sous-Marine Autonome) and German fuel cells,  the duration they can stay underwater can be increased substantially. They also have the added advantages of being smaller and cheaper than nuclear submarines. Another reason could have been the recent accident on submarines both in Russia and India.

8ak: Why are others like Fincanteri, BAE Systems and US manufacturers not in the deal?

Yadav: RFI was sent to French DCNS, Spanish Navantia, Russian Rubin, Italy’s Fincantieri and German HDW (now owned by Thyssenkrup). Great Britain and America only build nuclear submarines and not diesel electric.

8ak: The RFI was written up a couple of years ago, so why the delay?

Yadav: RFI  was issued  on 27 October 2008 for six diesel-electric attack submarines to be built in Indian shipyard, public or private, with special emphasis on full transfer of technology.  The subs were to be equipped with air-independent propulsion (AIP) boosting their operational capabilities to have high degree of stealth, land-attack capability and ability to incorporate futuristic technologies. Since this will be a new type of submarine, the details and processing of project of this size does take time. Beside 3 reasons which delayed the project.

  • Some stray thoughts why not go for nuclear submarines, which has its own advantage and disadvantages such as vastly improved range and speeds, but are noisy hence no  stealthy operations.
  • Time was also wasted on Pull and Push for this crucial programme by the public or private sector. Navy pressing to opt for a shipyard other than the Mazagon Docks, which has its hands full and has been delaying most of the projects.
  • Some friendly countries have been trying to put pressure that the additional submarine be procured from them. Hence the delay in RFP.

8ak: Why is the Indian private sector so enthusiastic about this announcement?

Yadav: Public sector shipyards like Mazgaon dock are running at full capacity and behind schedule. L&T’s excellent performance in the construction of the nuclear submarine and smaller submarine projects has given the Navy and the ministries the confidence in the private sector’s ability to deliver quality vessels, systems and on deliver as per schedule. A minimum of one submarine will be built at a private shipyard and a some sub-systems will be supplied by the private sector boosting indigenous capabilities.

Join the Conversation

Makes you wander whats coming down the pike — This will only add ontop of an already congested op area with a lot of shaloow water zones with little manuverability. I see our guy having to conduct a lot more ultrs silent runnings when depolyed to or through these zones which takes a lot out of a crew. What most dont realize as compared to the surface NAVY, underwater you have no allies unless they are at a pre determined location and time frame — other than that you track ( or cat and mouse) anyone you pickup in your op area. With a number of these being air independent conventional boats makes it even worse because they are so hard to detect in the first place. Our sonar techs, fire control tracking parties, and torpedo room personnel are going to get pushed a lot harder in the future with more and more subs hitting the oceans.

CONTINUED: Our submarine force is definately up to the task but I feel for them and what they must endure in the future. If any of you doubt what Im saying then I challenge you to sit quietly in one location around friends or family and not be able to move or speak above a whisper, watch TV, listen to a radio, flush a toilet, make coffe, or cook a meal for a few hours and then imagine what it is like doing it for days on end. About the only thing that can compare is being in a hide conducting a recon or sniping.

Largest most lavishly equipped submarines in the world but we are still supposed to feel sorry for them. Such is the culture of entitlement in the navy. Perhaps they should all spend a tour in an indian sub for some perspective.

Oblat — you have obviously never been on a US attack class sub, there is nothing lavish about them. And I have been at sea on Indian — Turkish — Korean — Chilean — french — italian — German rusian and a few other subs, They are filthy– stink– drink booze– smoke– and walk around in thier underwear and dont flush thier toilets. I prefered being in a hide and crapping in ziploc bags to doing that again. We have the best SUBMARINERS IN THE WORLD BAR NONE, no other country keeps thier guys deployed 60 to 120 days at a time without a port visit either the way our guys do so give them a break. Yeah they might get 4 hots and a bed every night or they may go days without either, but most people in the world cant put up with what they do on a daily basis. You would be supprised at how many macho types and even those who have actualy served in combat break down and freak out as soon as they hear the air leaving the ballast tanks and the super structure popping.

You guys actually crap in plastic bags when you go silent? –_–

I said being in a hide and crapping in a ziploc, it’s a position operators set up in the field for recon and sniping, and yes on those type ops I did it in a bag and kept it until I was in an area to get rid of it without comprimise (and no crappin in a bag while laying flat is not all its cracked up to be. On US Subs the toilets are gravity drain and silent flush so its ok to use them most times.

Thanks, your unique insight is appreciated.

Good Morning Folks,

A good post. Basically what it is saying is that India wants to remain a contender for regional power and not try and be a Blue Water Navy with power projection. That is more good news.

Now on the US front. Yesterday Northrop Grumman announced that it would close its Avondale yard in 2013 after it completes current orders. The Pascagoula yard is up for sale, no decision has yet been made by N/G what to do if Pascagoula can’t find a buyer. Interest from both Australia and South Korea was expressed in Pascagoula a year ago but has gone cold. BAE is now actively marketing Bath Maine’s yard.

I’m sure how much of this is based on a report let out last week “US Navy Future Force: Over the next 30 years”. I’ll let Greg and Colin report on this, I’m sure we have different interest in this report. In short what far fewer will mean to US ship building, and what can be made up for with foreign purchasing is now yet known.

Their is a problem here, if these two yards are shut down, and at this point it looks like the will be, it will put a serious dent in the ability of the US to produce ships in an emergency or even just to meet the modest needs of the USN for the next 30 years. I think strong consideration should be given to for the DoD to take over these yards and Bath if no suitable buyers can be found.

The take over would have to be a GM type deal zero out debt, move pension and retiree programs into the pension guarantee trust fund and medicare and basically restarting the yards. In the long run (10 years out) if done right, perhaps another job for Retried USCG Admiral Thadd Allen?, these three yards could produce better quality ships, faster and and at considerably lower costs to the tax payer then if they were privately owned.

In the Gulf these yard and local suppliers accounts for 10–20 thousand jobs and in Maine 7–10 thousand. It would be very difficult in both these areas to replace these (relative to the area) high paying jobs.

Regardless the USN still plans on buying at least 198 combat ships over the next 30 years. Or 6–7 of these hauls a year.

There is not a sufficient return on equity at these levels to support the returns that is currently being demanded by stock holders, while at the same time building a world class quality product at a price that the US tax payer can afford, in this era of quick high profit derivatives and hedge funds

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Byron — A lot of the reason for this is that those same contractors are taking over the closed down NAVY yards such as Pearl and Diego due to them being in better weather locations and the NAVY yards, drydocks and equipment being in better condition than thier own. EB in Groton CT is the only hold out thus far for relocating since non of the other yards has the facilities for US submarine construction — the old Mare Island could possibly be used for ssn’s but it like Charleston shipyard recieved little attention after the base closed and is in pretty bad disarray last time I was there.

No need for the US to get panicked — It appears to me that this is clearly an effort to counter China’s growth in this area — aren’t they up to around 50–55 subs now? India’s strategy appears defensive but with broad capability. Subs aren’t my area but i’d love to see a comparison between the nations sub capability when India’s designs are firm.

I’m in agreement, Our submarine force is the best in the world. While the smaller and quieter conventional subs are harder to detect and easier to manuver in shallow water, thier crews are not as disciplined and thier weapons systems and sonars are no where near our capability. Nothing on the high seas can get away from a MK48ADCAP torpedo no matter how fast they try to go or turns they make trying to get away the MK48 will get them. And yes india –pakistan and china all hate each other because each is taking US money away from the other which to me would lead to us pulling all our contacts out of each country if we were trully worried about world peace and let them stand on thier own rather than argue who deserves more of our corporate money.

@boomer: ‘Each is taking US money away’:
Please read ‘Boeing predicts US$31 billion in defense sales in India’ http://​www​.8ak​.in/​8​a​k​_​i​n​d​i​a​_​d​e​f​e​n​c​e​_​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​0​9​/​12/…

India –Pakistan and China all hate each other
India has supported China so we dont understand why it (and the US) is weaponizing Pakistan. China is constantly provoking India by border incursions, issuing visas on loose sheets to Arunachal/Kashmir residents and completely avoiding any steps that would solve the border issue. None of this recent weaponising of India would happen if it wasnt for Chinese threat and weaponisation of Pakistan. As for Pakistan, Kashmir was an independent state at time of partition and India had every intention to let it remain this way. Pakistan organised a military invasion to take Jammu and Kashmir and Indian army was called in to thwart the attack. Pakistan has never been able to deal with the defeat and have been responsible for a 60 year hate campaign. Indians are entrepreneurs and we would like nothing more than peace to prevail so that we can get on with our lives.
As for the US, it is fairly clear but never admitted that post 9/11 you attacked the wrong countries. Instead of Iraq (oil) and Afghanistan, it should have been Pakistan (not even declared a terrorist state despite all evidence) and Saudi Arabia (financer)

I take it your roots are in India? But it appears we are in agreement that the whole region is in turmoil, shake hands long enough to spin the other around and stab them in the back. Let me say first I have no issue with India building up its military, I only stated that more submarines will only make it that more dangerous to traverse the waters submerged within that region. I can oly say that America did not invade the wrong countries but the government did not follow through with thier pledge to seek out and destroy terrorist where ever they may be. And I cant honestly say it would have been different if a Republican was in charge right now. If it was up to the average American citizen we would have went right across pakistans borders in pursuit of terrorist and would have cut them off financialy if they did not support us and ordered all US companies operating with the pakistan government to cease,

CONTINUED: But unfortuneately the Government here just as anywhere else in the world folds to the mighty dollar regardless to the cause. But it is a fact that all three countries are wanting more and more of the US corporate off shore billions spent every year to support thier governments and economies, if we withdrew it completely there would be less tension from it and more realistic treaties could be derived between the three to share resources. In reality we need to get our selves back in order — bring all of our production back to the US solely in support of our own economies, but first we need to get rid of all the greed in our government such as imposing a flat tax rate and doing away with state income taxes as well to bring US production cost back down. if we imposed a flat 10% tax on profits and income we would be one of the lowest in the world which would bring off shore production to us further stimmulating our economy and make us less likely to try and worry about controlling the rest of the world.

With all of India’s internal problems like:
– Its infranstrucker problems;
— A majority of its people living on & in the streets with little or nothing to protect them from the weather!
— Lage poverty problems,( thousands of its people have nothing to eat ).
India continues to puchase or build state of the art vessels & other military weapons/items.
The question may quite be why is money of no problem for military items while half or more of thier
population suffers in poverty??

unfortuneately chief that applies to a lot of countries including our own to some extent. but it is a good question for all to ponder.

No point trying to fix poverty problems if you cannot defend your people. And the defense industry does employ plenty of people.

Cant argue with that either, its how I make my living these days.

Perhaps YOU should spend some time on an American attack sub to gain some perspective. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. I seriously doubt you would last a week before you lost your little marbles due to the stressful living conditions. Your ignorant nonchalance is pathetic.

You should take to heart the maxim, “Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.”

people are starving in India and have no drinking water and running water and toilets and they are spending 11 billion on submarines. Imagine how far 11B can go in India to get that nation on track.

Yet even in America with our much higher standard of living we hear the same thing from the left. The type who put “the USAF should have to hold a bake-sale for a new bomber” bumper-stickers on their Volkswagons. Reality is much more complicated than that. I don’t know a ton about India, but I am sure those who support increased defense spending have valid reasons.

I am glad that I already ate before I read this.

As far as spending goes, Defense spending is one of the few things that the government can do to creat REAL jobs. And that’s what keeps people from starving, it is also responsible for many of our technological advances that we take for granted. I would rather have my taxes used to build bombers, than to have them go to some fat lazy mom who smokes crack and breeds criminals.

India is ensuring that it can contain China, should China decide to force it’s will in the region.
The problem with this region is there are three NUCLEAR armed rivals and if a nuclear war is
started in the 21st century, this is where it will start. There is a great deal of interest in the US
(a strong Indian Allie) to beef up it’s military to counter China’s modernization. The US has limited
hardware in the Indian military, typically they use Russian equipment. The problem with the Russian
equipment is it is getting obsolete, so India is working with many of the Russian companies to fund modernization. This is an interesting twist, both India and China use Russian designs and both have a vested interest in modernizing that same equipment. Russia would normally be in a strong position to capitalize on this arrangement, if it weren’t for the Chinese attempt to copy these designs and build them cheaper for the world market. My opinion is the Indian government is trying to build an indigenous defense
industry to compete with China for modernization purposes.

Yes — and if you read between the lines, the message is that these are not just white water coastal defense subs for the Indian Navy. This lets them go out and operate in the approaches to the Indian Ocean and perhaps beyond. To do what attack subs do for a living.

Nothing like a little “been there, done that” to seperate the men from the fools.

There is probably some hard balancing in this equation. The real question for the US side is how does it position itself strategically, other than stand aside and watch the action. How much and what kind of projection and presence is stabilizing ?

I’ve been reading a lot lately about the India-China relationship, which is growing more tense owing to China’s increasingly aggressive posture along their mutual border. This appears to be fueling nationalistic feelings in India and perhaps making it easier to get support for spending $11B on submarines. The decision to build them domestically was clearly shrewd since it helps the nation grow its shipbuilding capabilities, a great example of achieving two goals with one program. In this sense, the $11B will contribute indirectly to relieving some of the urgent needs of the nation’s poor, as Lee noted; economies are obviously hugely complicated, and stimulating one large industry can lead to ripple effects and synergies that improve the lot of thousands of people beyond the yard workers themselves. We can hope that’s the result here. I broadly agree with Lee that the money would have bought a lot of new clean water generation and distribution systems for the country’s 800,000,000 poor (or whatever the current figures are.) But you also have to deter China from pushing in and seizing pieces of your country the way they seized Tibet.

Although it does paint a very interesting picture.…..

“knock, knock”

Hello?

Hi there, I’m General Ripper and I’m with the United States Air Force. My compatriots and I are going door to door today looking for responsible Americans like yourself to help out our great nation. We’re selling cookies to raise funds for the purchase additional aircraft to make up for operational losses.

Oh, I like cookies. How much for a box?

$10,000

$10,000? In that case I’m sorry, we’ve already bought some this year. My wife bought them at the office.

No she didn’t. Echelon intercepts, combined with satellite imaging and UAS surveillance all confirm that you currently have no cookies in your house. I would hate to be the one to tell your neighbors that someone was not willing to help America buy the aircraft it needs to keep our nation safe.

Er.…..um, I suppose I’ll take three boxes of the skinny mints.

Submarines are stupid.

@ blackfive,
British Petroleum Meds. That is funny.
Are they big enough to choke on?

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement