Rugged Phones Ready For War

Rugged Phones Ready For War

Just as smartphones have become an icon of the civilian world, they may soon find their way into every soldier’s kit.

Take a look at General Dynamics’ version of the battlefield smartphone.

The GD300 features a highly-sensitive GPS, 3.5 inch touch screen and the ability to connect door-kickers to the tactical network.


“It’s a commercial GPS as a stand-alone unit, but the beauty of it is with a click of a cable you can connect it to” secure communications gear such as the Joint Tactical Radio System, said Jason Jacob, product manager for General Dynamics Itronix, a commercial arm of GD C4 Systems.

“We are looking to supply these to every dismounted soldier,” Jacob said.

GD is one of several companies developing military-style smartphones in response to the Army’s acknowledgement that the technology could prove useful on the digital battlefield. The Army has been testing a mix of 200 iPhones and other smartphones at Fort Bliss for several months, trying to figure out their best uses and to see how they hold up.

The Android-based GD300 can be mounted on the forearm or chest. At 8 ounces, it’s a “lightweight, fully rugged device” that measures 5.8 inches long, 2.6 inches wide and .7 inches thick, Jacob said. It has a 600MHz processor and a Lithium-ion battery good for 8 hours of use.

A simple cable will connect the GD300 to tactical radios that use software such as the Enhanced Position Locating Reporting System. Once connected, the GD300 can send and receive text messages and graphics and use situational-awareness tools such as Blue Force Tracker.

GD wants the Army, and other services to buy it, but the company also plans to sell the GD300 commercially.

“In the future, I do expect that any soldier could order it,” Jacobs said.

It won’t be cheap though. Right now it costs about $1,200, Jacob said, but the price could drop below $1,000 on bulk orders.

Matthew Cox is a contributor to DoD Buzz. His work can be found at www​.tacticalwriter​.com.

Join the Conversation

They’re gonna make a smart phone that can handle mud?

The iPhone 4 with an OtterBox case will do the trick.

Just don’t hold the bottom of the phone or you’ll lose all signal. And if you drop it the glass on the iPhone 4 breaks. And don’t get me started on the 6 hour battery… Now the Evo… :)

What the article doesn’t mention is whether the phone and its encryption has been validated by NSA. Because if it hasn’t, then they don’t have anything. The article also didn’t have any discussion of what waveforms the phone might be using or how it connects to tactical radios.

What part of putting it in a military grade case did you miss?

8-hour battery life is NOTHING. And if it gets hacked, can the enemy locate each of our soldiers with GPS precision?

Yes they probabaly could. But that would have to be an advanced enemy such as China– then either they would have knocked out our GPS or we would have knocked out theres so tracking using GPS would be useless.

Guess you haven’t seen all the negative reviews about the iPhone 4, including those who tested its ruggedness, which the glass cover cracks from just a 4 foot drop. Even in a protective case the glass breaks from a 10 foot drop.

The digital battlefield is a bunch of BS that is drowning our guys in crapp they dont need. Laugh if you will but its actualy getting like the scene in ALIENS when the troops were running around in a panick waiting for the LT to tell them what to do next via digital networking and the troops were getting killed off while he was in a panic mode. Every time they force technology on our guys they drop teaching them how to operate without it or on thier own. It used to be anyone in the field could take charge or make split second decisions but now days you have to stop while the guy in the rear monitoring does a shift change or head break. That is why we are having such troubles with no tech enemies, they dont have to request permision to engage or act acording to the manual.

Listen I am only talking on my personal insight, but everything you just said is completely untrue. I’ve been the basic rifleman, team leader, squad leader in an infantry Bn in the Marines, and they push everything down to the lowest level, the way we’re taught is to know the 2 billets above you and that is how we train. Every Marine in the squad should be able to function without leadership or in a leadership role as needed. The platoon commander gives the squad leader the mission of the patrol and he is free to accomplish that mission how he deems it neccessary, of course within ROE and law of land warfare guidelines.

Available now with 2 deployment commitment to your local cell provider

I understand completely where you are coming from — Unfortunately the Army doesn not share that same insight, they are getting farther and farther from independent thinking, especialy at the lower levels. Now there are units/ squads within the Army trying to hold on to the old ways and training thier troops on the slide to be combat efficient without remote oversight but its generaly looked down upon. I’m not knocking the Army troops — just thier brass wanting to be in full charge of everything to include operations occuring miles from thier location. But you just answered youre own burried question of why the Marines keep getting all the hell hole objectives and have completed each one effectively. keep up the good work and watch your six over there.

I’m not a iPhone fan, but the iPhone 4 is considered the best smartphone ever created. If the phone was so bad, then why have MILLIONS of the devices been sold? You will always get those negative reviews.

That’s called marketing and the apple mystic

But can you update facebook/twitter accounts, etc., or perhaps play a game like Moder Warfare 2? You know, the REALLY important things. Actually that might prove problematic now that I think about the average age of our soldiers… I mean how long would it be before some techie in the squad showed everyone how to do these things, regardless of safeguards that might be in place?

I wonder if they already invented the video phone already. I know somebody who can provide this technology. Email me a line for interested purchasers. I accept multiple orders.

The iPhone 4 and the Evo can both do live video chat.

One word.. sheep.

The iPhone 4 is defective, instead of recalling and fixing the signal issues, their issuing free “bandages” that you put on the bottom side of your phone so you don’t touch an area that screws the signal up. But when you put the bandage on, it makes the phone look ugly.

Millions of these are sold to idiots like my brother-in-law that just wants to strut around and show off that he has the latest and greatest. He was bragging about all this stuff his could do, then he started to make fun of my Motorola Barrage. I let him shoot his mouth off, then I calmly got a glass of water, dropped my phone in it, left it for a few minutes, then threw the phone against the wall, then picked it up and called someone. While his mouth was still hanging open, I told him to give me his “pretty boy” phone and let me do the same thing to that. Needless to say he shut his stupid mouth.

I think roland was being sarcastic, the army is busy reinventing the (digital) wheel.

lol

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement