Is UK Hunting SAS For Savings?

Is UK Hunting SAS For Savings?

The United Kingdom began its hunt for military savings the weekend after the Farnborough Air Show and the search has ranged throughout the defense establishment. The tone was set by Liam Fox, defense minister, when he told the British press: “The current defense programs are entirely unaffordable and the unavoidable reality is that change is coming.”

One of Britain’s most precious capabilities, the one that gave rise to the famed Special Air Services regiment, is its Long Range Reconnaissance Patrols. Most of this capability resides within the 21 Special Air Services regiment known as the Artists. A Territorial Army unit (roughly equivalent to a reserve unit in the U.S.), the Artists comprises three squadrons, plus an HQ squadron. There are rumors that the British may consolidate one of these squadrons, which happened once before. These special operations units are very expensive, largely because of the training involved, but they have survived since World War II because of the excellent and very flexible capabilities they bring to the British government. They also provide the regular SAS 22 regiment with extra manpower.

Meanwhile, the first full swing of the axe looks to fall on the Air Force, cutting force structure and capability. The Daily Telegraph reports that the cuts will include:


The entire force of 120 GR4 Tornado fighter-bombers looks destined for the scrap heap to save £7.5 billion over the next five years. The Tornado was supposed to be in service until 2025, but with a major overhaul due in the next five years costing £10 million for each aircraft, it is now under threat.

The cut will mean job losses as RAF Lossiemouth and RAF Marham totalling almost 5,000 personnel.

Under the plans, the number of Eurofighter Typhoons is likely to be reduced further from 160 to 107 planes based at a single RAF airfield to save £1  billion. The entire fleet of 36 Hercules transport aircraft, the workhorse in Iraq and Afghanistan, is to be phased out and replaced by an order of 22 new A400M planes.

The £3.6 billion project for nine Nimrod MR4 reconnaissance aircraft is also vulnerable, along with a number of other surveillance planes.

The Telegraph reports that the Army could be reduced by as much as 40 percent and the Royal Marines taken from the Royal Navy and grouped with the Army’s two parachute battalions into a super elite unit. One of two Army armored brigades based in Germany will be dropped from the rolls along with its collection of Challenger 2 tanks and Warrior armored personnel carriers.

The paper writes:

“If implemented, the cuts will mean that Britain will almost certainly depart the world stage as a major military power and become what military chiefs call a “medium-scale player.”

On top of all that, the Conservatives who lead the government appear to be skeptical of an innovative set of deals called private finance initiatives. These deals include their CSAR and airborne tanker programs, according to the Telegraph.

Those which could be most vulnerable to cuts are the £13.8bn defence training academy; a £7bn programme to replace search-and-rescue helicopters, which has already been put under review; and a £10bn contract for aerial refuelling planes.

No final decisions have been made and some of this may have been leaked to mobilize public and military opinion to help stave them off. The final cuts will be announced in October. But remember Fox’s comments at Farnborough. We may well be witnessing the second major decline in British military capability since World War II.

Join the Conversation

They best wait and see what happens to our military first before cutting thiers down because we may not be big or efficient enough to piggy back on any longer the way things are looking these days.

BOOMER, just one tiny problem with your comment, you’re using common sense. I’ve got this sense, you should know better.

It’s too soon to draw conclusions from any of this.

Who needs a mlitary as long as we have enough money to the tune of 26 billion to bail out teacher unions. Got to keep the illegal immigrants educated don’t you know.…

No we wait and see. This reduction will not go down so easily, but the down scaling will be massive. Nothing on the nuclear side of the bill?

If you cannot put a measured response into the field with conventioinal forces , nuke the buggers!

Yo Boomer you hit the nail on the head. You start cutting and cutting pretty soon you have nothing to show but a hollowed out militay. That the Hint UK.

the cutbacks in 21 started months ago

Its a horrid affair when the British Government thinking of replacing the elite squadron as cost cutting measure maybe remove the top heavy public service bill and keep the money in National Security and Defence . Why should British defence pay for bankers risk taking and cut politicans high paid incomes. Keep you hands of the SAS Regiments and sack the crooks in banking sectors which have given the industry a bad name. Remember its politican who sent the troops?

Leave our Military alone and get the necessary finance from funds given away to aid places like Pakistan and Afghanistan and other countries, Charity begins at home, we should put our own house in order before we try sorting others out. I am in favour of a national referendum for major decisions like cutting defence, it would make a lot of sense to stop wasting all the millions of pounds paid into the EEC just to be part of it, the best we can do under the present shared government is to approach our own Members of Parliament with our objections and suggestions, then we will see if they do in fact represent us.

The SAS and SBS have always been an elite force and in my opinion are more useful in conflicts like today’s than ever. The British have been penny-pinching on their military since the end of the Cold War. What excuse do they have for these cuts when the root of the problem lies elsewhere.

Also the Tornado fighter-bombers have got to be one of the more useful British aircraft in the Middle East at the moment. If you must retire some Tornado variants, why not some of the ADV interceptors?

I would have to agree with the above post. The British SF community is so stretched at the moment, as they are exactly the forces that are needed in the current conflicts, and much more effective than large numbers of squaddies on the ground. Of course training costs are high, but perhaps they should look at a man to man return on investment basis. Obviously that these are very small numbers of personnel compared to the US SF numbers, and that they are also having to maintain people ready for their other roles and responsibilities ie hostage rescue.

One place they could save a lot of money is to reduce their responsibilty for politicians’ protection details…

Military activity is purely ‘politics by other means’ to quote Clausewitz. Military action is a tool of grand strategy — foreign policy, international relations and national interest. International aid is just as sharp a tool in grand strategy as a gun if used with thought! Something we British used to be rather good at.

I strongly sympathise with the U.K. armed forces, but international aid (IF used selectively and with thought of purpose) is a complementary tool.

Let’s hope that the SDSR is light in its touch and that H.M. armed forces maintain versatility to concentrate force globally.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement