Raytheon Scores Second JAGM Success

Raytheon Scores Second JAGM Success

UPDATED: Raytheon Video of Missile Destroying T-72

Raytheon and Boeing took a step closer last week to qualifying their prototype Joint Air to Ground Missile for the next acquisition milestone in the $5 billion program with what company officials say was a visually spectacular test.

The missile, which had no explosive warhead, struck a working T-72 tank after a 4-kilometer flight and destroyed the tank, driving it half a foot across the ground, sending a several hundred pound road wheel flying through the air and leaving White Sands Missile Range with nothing much left to shoot at, said Mike Riley, Raytheon business development manager for JAGM. (Pictures and video coming soon, we hope.) As long as the propellant did not explode that is all to the good. The propellant is not supposed to be volatile enough to explode, an important consideration for the Navy as it packs missiles belowdecks.


The successful test leaves the Raytheon team with two of three successful tests needed under the framework set up by former Pentagon acquisition czar John Young. The company has fired the missile four times, twice on the company dime. The final test, company officials said, will occur very soon. The prototyping deadline is mid-September. They are competing against Lockheed, which has not fared as well in the testing contest so far. Lockheed’s first test went well. The second test missed the target by roughly 500 yards.

Lockheed says they now know what caused the missile in the second government test to miss the target. As often happens with high-tech weapon systems it was a simple part that failed. “You’re going to think this is silly, but it’s a mechanical bracket that holds one of the rocket motors. It wasn’t a design issue. We are confident the design is sound,” Frank St. John, head of Lockheed’s JAGM’s effort.

Time is tight for Lockheed. The three government tests must be finished by Sept. 11, 24 months after the contract for this phase was awarded. St. John says they’ve got a range slot at White Sands on Sept. 10 for the third government supervised test, which will require them to use the missile’s radar sensor prior to launch to capture the target. The next day, St. John says Lockheed will pay for what will essentially be a make-up test to compensate for the failed second test. Lockheed will pay for that test. And the company may do more test shots after that date as long as it pays for them. Data for any test after the Sept. 11 deadline that is paid for by Lockheed or Raytheon may be submitted to the government for consideration in the program’s next phase.

Join the Conversation

This reminds me of a story about the Israeli Air Force. They took the warhead out of the Maverick missiles. The missile hit would then disable, but not destroy the enemies’ Soviet tanks. Israel would collect the disabled tanks, refurbish them, and sell at great profit.

Actually the Israeli’s did not remove the warhead. They replaced the explosives in the warhead with cement. And the tanks were rather more than ‘disabled’. They wound up with a twelve inch hole smashed in them and their crews and the equipment inside were pretty much pulverised. But at least the tanks were not reduced to burnt out scrap scattered across the desert. The Israeli’s rebuilt the tanks for their own use.

I like it smooth takeoff and pin point system. reminds of the good old days of the lance missile from ft sill oklahoma

I was in Crete and saw a Lance bounce twice, then dive under the water, come back into the air, and go down range for a direct hit. This doesn’t sound much like Lance.

At least these missiles are hitting targets, the NLOS didn’t hit anything but dirt.

The majority of time it hit nothing but dirt.. BUT it did hit its target… one or twice.. (Out of 20 or so shots)

But the NLOS will eventually be a wonderful piece of equipment once (if) all the bugs and cost issues are fixed..

Agreed, with the continued success of the tri-mode seeker in the SDB II it is a little puzzling why NLOS is still trying unsucessfully to implement the LADAR seeker with automatic target recognition (ATR) algorithms and radio data links. NLOS is too valuable to the Army and the Navy to lose it over seeker technology. It will get fixed.

sounds like they are developing this for the fast ships thier building? Swapping out modules for different missions. Maybe its for those tri-hull 50 knots an hour jobs?

There is no reason this couldn’t be fitted to a boat. I believe Hellfire is used on some small Norwegian patrol boats. LCS really needs some quad Harpoon launchers however.

That could have something to do with the fact that in NLOS-LS (NetFires), the seekerhead & electronics has to be launch-tolerant, i.e.,: higher G forces as the rocket motor accelerates it out of the vertical tube.

SDBs are air-released, non-boosted weapons that probably only need several G’s stress proofing to tolerate what the aircraft can fly at with them underwing.

NetFires/NLOS missiles probably need several dozen G’s rating because they’re rocket launched, so the bits and pieces inside will be more complex and cost more.

Combat Boat 90 or CB90 AKA Stridsbåt 90.

This is the video http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​i​Y​X​B​v​C​r​z​bHo

They did neither. The IDF collected ABANDONED military equipments during their operation. During the Yom Kippur War, for instance, IDF conducted maneuvers that enveloped their bigger opponents and captured men and materials by the ship loads.

Some captured tanks, for example were converted into low silhouette APC called Achzarit. http://​www​.globalsecurity​.org/​m​i​l​i​t​a​r​y​/​w​o​r​l​d​/​i​sra…

I had to triple-check the post dates on these comments to make sure I wasn’t seeing things — Folks — NLOS is D-E-A-D. Period. Put the corpse back in the coffin — it looks okay now but it will start stinking very shortly. The DoD transferred the remaining funds to the Navy at the beginning of the summer (goodness knows what they did with it) but the amount wasn’t enough to make the program whole. The Medium-Range Surface-to-Surface Missile Bid was opened in June on the Federal Biz Opportunity site. So far, there are two minority owned contractors and about four major bidders, including LockMart and MBDA. Lots of churn going on with the replacement.

Great, another weapon that we can’t use against the Taliban because the Taliban DON’T HAVE ANY TANKS!

at one time they did, before 9/11. They blow up real good! Bodies flyin’ shrapnel searing yabba dabba dooski!!!

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement