Efficiencies Begin to Bite; 600 Execs Leaving Lockheed

Efficiencies Begin to Bite; 600 Execs Leaving Lockheed

UPDATED: Top ATL Official Calls Departures “Natural Course of The Business Cycle”

Lockheed Martin announced today that some 25 percent — 600 — of its top people accepted buyout offers and will leave the company.

This enormous wave of some of the world’s top defense executives will doubtless swell the ranks of consultants around Washington, but it also marks a watershed in the defense industry’s management of what many expect will be at least several years of reduced defense budgets. Of course, this all takes place in light of Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ pursuit of $100 billion in Pentagon efficiencies over the next five years.


A senior acquisition official described the buyouts as a result of “the natural course of the business cycle.” I asked Brett Lambert, the Pentagon’s director of industrial policy who spoke at the Comdef defense conference in Washington this afternoon, what signal the buyouts sent to the Pentagon. “We are not going to have double digit growth and there is a natural outcome to that,” he said.

Bottom line for the company is that, while the executives contributions were praised by CEO Bob Stevens, their departures will “enable us to achieve significant cost savings and a leaner management structure at a time when our customers have an urgent need for more affordable solutions to the global security challenges they face.”

The departures “will yield substantial savings in 2011 and on a recurring basis in 2012 and beyond,” the company said in a statement. Their departures “will help align the number of senior leaders with the overall decline of about 10,000 in the employee population since the beginning of last year, cut overhead costs and management layers, and increase the Corporation’s speed and agility in meeting commitments.”

Conversations with several senior defense executives indicate that Lockheed offered very substantial incentives to encourage people to take the offers. But as a sign of just how tough the decision must have been for each person, we understand that several hundred of those who accepted the buyout offers did so within 24 hours of the deadline.

Boeing, of course, announced employee reductions of 10,000 people back in 2009 but those were employees across the company, not the executive corps. And Boeing’s culture hews more closely to that of the commercial airplane business, not to the defense world.

Join the Conversation

Good Evening Folks,

Lockheed Martin has go the word on the F-35 and its not good. The rest of us will hear in a few days. If you are moving a program from development and testing to production you have to ADD personal, not cut 25% of your management.

Also you don’t normally lay off on a Wednesday, you do it on Friday, so the payroll is ready.

ALLONS,

Byron Skinner

To me, the fact that they even had 600 execs to cut is good evidence of just how efficient they’ve been running all along.

I recall at the height of the Air Forces Force Shaping initiative back in 2007 they announced they were cutting some 40 or so general grade officers. Now that we have Force Shaping Part Deux (now called Force Management), majority of the planned personnel cuts are commissioned officers.

In large organizations, cuts should start from the top down. Historically, large organizations with huge room in their budgets tend to add more (often redundant) upper layers of management. So when the budget shrinks, so should the upper supervision. But this isn’t always the case, now is it?

I wonder if anybody’s tracking if they’re even missed.

We need to accelerate the sales of our (USA) hardware and services to foreign allies to cope with the military/ navy / airforce/ marine financial backfall.

Having been part of an executive down sizing at a major corporation in the early 1990’s, I will tell you that often, it is some of not only, the best and brightest, but the most innovative that leave. The result at my former corporation was a total loss of that innovation, resulting in corporate stagnation and loss of industry leadership. A ‘me too’ corporation, that had been a technology leader for more than half a century.

A return to “Flat” organizations (fewer levels of management — - more front-line divisions) isn’t all bad. It forces decision making, and accompanying responsibility and authority, down to where the actual work gets done. It ensures fewer internal bureaucratic “nay-sayers” between the engineers and the CEO or COO. And, hopefully, downsizing will result in getting rid of the “Deputy-to_ and the “Assistant for” parasites that do little except suck on the overhead teat.

That’s a bit easier said than done IMHO.

American hardware atleast seems to be priced a bit out of the league for smaller defence forces. Or maybe not quite fitting for those forces.

Eg. the apache longbow and F-22 raptors as examples of too expensive and the abrams MBT as requiring too much fuel compaired to other MBT’s. Which could be hard to support away from home for smaller forces.

President Reagan’s military buildup in the 1980s resulted in “Over half of Lockheed’s top execs have been with the company for at least 20 years” (Bloomberg Businessweek Sep 1, 2010 09:08:05 GMT) which leaves as many with over 20 years still there, if not more possibly ready to retire. Now that we are at the end of this cycle; was President Reagon strategically correct to take this talent and money out of competitive posture into military posture? Did we miss the window where the military strength was sufficient to make the transition, earlier; can this talent make the transition to competitive posture, now?

The problem is that the best and brightest leave first because they can find employment elsewhere! This is NOT good news as a whole. They should have offered the gold parachutes based upon performance! (Get rid of the least effective managers first!!) Give them TWO options — Take a minimal parachute or be laid off!!! Giving a parachute to an effective manager and then hiring him back is STUPID and NOT cost effective in the long run!!! To pay him THREE ways is just plain silly! (Retirement, parachute, and contract salary) The problem is the games with “colored” money! While it is reported differently, it is still REAL money!!! Contract money is reported separately (Expense), and the retirement and parachute is NOT reported at all! So, it FALSELY appears as if they have reduced costs, when in fact the costs “to the people” have gone up tremendously! The accounting games cost the taxpayers billions!!! We need to get budget experts in the system that are SMART and can calculate exactly what each person costs the taxpayer, including retirement, bonuses, stock options, parachutes, etc!!! I think that the average person would be shocked!!! I saw people retire from a program and return as a contractor and triple their “COST” to the program after all was said and done! That is REAL money!!!

This is all good if they also reduce the “extra layers” of management that was present. Filling the 600 slots with others and continuing as business as usual will have little effect. However, if LM goes forward with streamlining the management pyramid and reduces the salary base, then they will accomplish plenty in the years ahead. Good luck.

Good article, Colin. As usual, you capture not only the facts but the aura/ambiance of the situation very well.

The vast majority of companies are top heavy and need a good cleaning out. I’m sure that LM is not exception. Problem is that they are probably getting rid of some good managers and keeping the dreggs. Normally they tend to cut the blue collar people first, so I am surprised that they are going after managers instead. I have a feeling we are going to hear some bad news sometime soon that will explain what is really going on here.

Let me see if I get this. Businesses, e.g. Lockheed, that contribute to the economy are reducing staff to become more efficient and goverment that sucks money out of the economy is adding approximately 20% more staff who make more in salary than in private industry. Yeah, that seems about right.

I’ll bet some right wing neo-con try to spin this as job losses. If I were getting the kind of money these guys/girls will be getting I’d retire too, I can’t work forever.

“But as a sign of just how touch the decision must have been for each person, we understand that several hundred of those who accepted the buyout offers did so within 24 hours of the deadline.”

I think this is normal, most people are not sure if they really want to retire, so thinking about it and discussing it with your spouse is very normal under the circumstances. And then again, some people just can’t accept the fact that they are no longer needed, it’s sad in a way to feel that way. When you work for a company for thirty years or so, and they reward you for services rendered, thats the only to leave. Me, I would go home and spend as much time with my grand kids as I can.…and put my blue ID card to work and MAC hop all over the place. Don’t look at retirement as a death sentence, look at it as a new beginning.

“Don’t live to work, Work to live”

Keith H,

Thanks much for the kind words. Often it is the details, the whispers I hear from folks like you that add the extra something to the piece. Send memos and tips and remember — no fingerprints!

All Defense Contractors mooch off the government. Many defense contracts are not needed and are even even duplicated so that someones kin folks can get rich, or someone in contracting or another high up position gets kick backs. IT’s amazing to watch someone retire from the government set themselves up with a nice contract before retiring and give kickbacks to the ones that approve it!

And the Secretary of Defense wants to increas TRICARE premiums, co pays, and deductibles to save money? He knows where the money is being wasted, fraud, abuse, theft, and contract kick bacxks are, the only problem is all of them are getting rich off of this corruption too!

with obama as president of our economy it is a miracle that ‘1800 were not let go.

Well, I’m sure those who truly wanted to retire and were at an age to get full benefits are quite happy.
Those who were younger and did not get full benefits from the process I’m sure, are not..

Where do they go now to work until they are ready to fully retire?? China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Isreal??
What secrets will they take with them when they go???

Due to excessive overhead and lack of emphasis on technical depth and integrity, LM has been non competitve for years. Reducing overhead will help LM be more competitive regarding pricing or cost. However, they need to significantly shift the emphasis from lowest cost and minimal compliance to be more innovative and technical superiority. Over the years, LM has driven the best engineers and scientist from there ranks in order to drive down cost while management appeared to grow in mumbers. This has significantly impacted there ability to provide convincing tech proposals and program execution. While the move to shed ~ 25% of level 7, 8, and 9s managers is a good step forward in reducing cost, the folks that generally volunteer are the better managers that have options leaving the others behind..

BTW, LM has pretty much eliminated top-level positions or level 7 from the technical ladder ~ 5 years ago. Only a hand full of engineer and scientists retain these positions, mosty from legacy promotions. LM elimiinated or discouraged technical accension or growth in order to reduce cost.

It gets even better.….……some of the organization within the DC Metro area have lost 50% of their senior management.……and it is the BEST AND BRIGHTEST, the same people who are depended upon to fix the areas that are broken.….……but we hear that phones from competitiors are ringing off the hook looking for the said talent! I think the song goes——–“What were you thinking”?

F’n A.

A slight correction: 600 people *volunteered*. Lockheed is still working out who will actually be offered a buyout.

This is the only blog that I agree with

William just because you couldnt cut it at Lockheed doesnt mean Lockheed mooches off anyone, do you know how much it costs to do research and development? If anyone is mooching is that idiot sitting in the oval office and destroying our country

Good Afternoon Folks,

I would suggest because of the loud lack of interest in the financial media on this today, Bloomberg, Barrons, WSJ etc. that we have not heard the worst yet.

The spin started as soon as this went up on the net yesterday. Does anybody by into the argument that ALL 600 of these managers being terminated are doing so “voluntarily”, and that discussions have been on going for months?

We have not heard the last on this. Tomorrow is Friday, the day that the Government like to break bad news.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Amen to that brother. It is truly pathetic. I wonder how much these guys were getting paid in total?

Good Evening Folks,

Obat your right, what wasn’t mentioned is the 10,000 plus hourly worker who will lose their jobs. For most this is the best job they have ever had, and with what the economic times are shaping up to be it might will be the best they ever had.

I’m not in favor of the argument that we need to keep useless defense programs alive simply because they provide jobs. Growing up in a city where economic good times in the 40’s to the 80’s was just a General Dynamics contract away. ie: the F-102, the F-106, the Atlas ICBM, Tomahawk Cruise Missile etc. I know what that loss of jobs will mean.

In 1990 when GD closed up shop in San Diego in a very short period of time, is was an economic disaster that took years to recover form. It took ten years to recover, but by 2000 we actually had a lot more defense jobs in the county, but not in one company, but in 200 or more companies. Maybe this is the answer for those cities that will have the full force of these lost jobs.

I guess though that what a community pays to have one of these mega employers that can make decisions in DC that effect Main Street with out Main Street have any say about it.

ALLONS,

Byron Skinner

Natural coarse of the business cycle—yeah right!. Maybe with John McCain, or any conservative for that matter, and a multi-trillion dollar debt would these corrections would be happening? And throw in a majority in congress that didn’t think defense was a waste of money.

600 managers given golden handshakes is just a PR stunt. Lockheed needs to cut many thousands of staff.
Its pretty clear that the strategy isn’t to adapt to the economic reality but to subvert it with PR stunts and increased lobbying for more pork.

If your host is dying you need to suck as much blood out of it as you can, right away.

You are so right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Every business, from large cap corps like LM to the dry cleaners down the street are feeling the effects of an inept administration who’s only goal is to grow Gov’t and remove freedom. Gov’t jobs increased by 20% since the Bush years w/ an average salary of $90k+, compared to the average American salary of $75k. Who is going to support those $90k salaries now that these high-tax paying workers are going to be released? Those of us who remain will be ‘requested’ to donate more to that wonderful local IRS charity. Someone has to foot the bill for all that porkulus, obamacare, and union payoffs…and who says community organizing doesn’t pay?

The article points out that this is *after* 10,000 people were laid off. Who else do you think should go?

Try again. The defense industry downturn started before Obama was even nominated.

The republicans have proven in spades that they can convert a greatest ever surplus into the greatest ever deficit — just imagine what they could do with a deficit.

You mean the same thing Obama accomplished with a deficit? Creating an even greater one? They would have to work awfully hard to beat Obama’s spending rates.

Of course it is zombies like yourself that the Democrats rely on for their votes.

rumor has it that they won’t stop anybody who has put in their papers.….…just the corporate folk trying to convince the street that their best and brightest will stay with them.….….….….not going to happen! To the Board of Directors, any confidence left in the executive management????? has to make you wonder???

Damn straight!

Did you mean Commercial or Military (Arms) hardware?
I need to research our (USA) industrial plant loading status before I can give an intelligent opinion.
As for Military, while we are still the top arms exporter in the world, there are stringent Laws and Rules for Export — ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations). IMHO, the redundant and sometimes assinine requirements that has no bearing on the function, performance, efficientcy, durability, and reliability of the hardware add significant cost to the military hardware.

Retire! Yes, I am finally hanging it up! …
17 Years ago, I took an early retirement from a private sector industry the very first day of the formal offer … that was a full six months ahead of the scheduled deadline. I was one of the 1,702 who took the package out of the 1,900 eligible employees. With my talent (engineering education, professional registration/ certification, experience, and superior track record) I wind up as an independent consultant with my former employer and other businesses. One of my retainer made an offer I can’t and did not refuse. Now, after ten years, spending more time with my grandsons and my wife is priority ONE.

Yup just like the reigning administration, they forget all was well the first 6 years of Bush (was far from perfect but not as bad as after the takeover and spending grew), The last 2 when the Dems took over the majority and pork grew that things got bad, Just like they fail to mention that a lot of the over priced programs they awarded where almost all from thier home states. Previous to the last two years most of DoD funding was for sustainment and upgrades and a lot of research programs were canceled. 2006 brought forth new R&D and acquisitions and over pricing.

UPDATE: According to internal emails, 99% of those 600 execs were accepted and are in fact leaving. So I guess I was wrong…

You and most of the others posting responses are absolutely ignorant. You have no idea how this business works. Stop commenting because your just embarrassing yourself.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement