Pentagon Nuke Revue Launched

Pentagon Nuke Revue Launched

Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Howie Chandler said today that a top-level nuclear review is being launched in the wake of a disturbing equipment failure at a nuclear missile facility in F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming.
The review, which will include elements of the Air Force, Strategic Command, Defense Threat Reduction Agency and senior OSD leaders, will take at least “several months,” Chandler told reporters after a presentation at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Here is what happened, as best the press knows: “An equipment failure disrupted communication between 50 nuclear missiles and the launch control center at Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming over the weekend,” the AP reported.
The failure lasted less than one hour on Saturday. The White House learned about the failure Tuesday morning.

Where is the Air Force going on this one? “We are going to take very hard look at command and control,” the vice chief said. Since reports indicate that communications to the missiles were lost, I asked him how it was possible that we maintained the ability to launch and had control of the weapons if communications were lost. This is what he said the first time I asked: “I have seen a lot of things that have been said the vice chief does not talk about the readiness of nuclear forces, and our airmen should not be talking about the readiness of nuclear forces.”


After his presentation, I asked him again and he stressed that contact with the national command authority, control and the ability to launch was never compromised and he also went out of his way to praise the missileers who discovered the problem and fixed it.

I also asked if any outside forces might have caused the problem and he said it’s just too early to tell what caused the failure and why.

Chandler began his presentation with a very funny video. It shows a man ice fishing, jigging away. Suddenly, an orca sweeps up through the ice and swallows him. The caption: “a day in the life of a vice chief.

Join the Conversation

The memories of the famous flight to Barksdale with nukes attached under wing is still fresh. This crap would have been very unlikely back in the days of SAC. Perhaps they need to recall some of the retired missileers and senior NCOs who knew how to run the strategic arsenal and conduct an assessment to see if these folks have a handle on this or they’ just think they do? Most likely, they’ll let a contract to some beltway bandit outfit to “do a study” or some nonsense like that and declare the problem “fixed”.

The “Flight to Barksdale” was massive personnel error on many levels. If this is a hardware problem then all the old CDB /ILCS/SSAS missileers on the planet aren’t going to help. Let the Air Force work it.

There are preventable hardware problems, and accidents. What is this? No one can say–or no one will say.

Stuxnet really mutates faster than expected…

Is imam obama working that fast on the unilateral disarmament of the USA?

Good Evening Folks,

I’m not sure what the big deal here is. The system malfunctioned, old systems do that, think Newton’s Third Law. The system went down, it acted as it was designed to when this happens. It appears that in no instance did any unauthorized party have access to or control of a US nuclear weapon.

I think the Clinton era screw up of “misplacing” the Presidential Code Card for several months is far more of a problem then this. It appears that there should be an military officer assigned the daily task to ask the President to show him the code card. That is dangerous.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Byron,

The President is unable to launch without the mutual technically-confirmed consent of the SecDef.

Maybe it was the UFO’s shining their EMP ray at the silos that did this dastardly deed. Colin, why don’t you get a statement from them, or better yet the 200 RAF/USAF officers that went public recently, on this matter?

Not true.

It’s probably just an automatic shutdown when one of the parts malfunction.

you have to pass a PT test now they took the bike ride away..also SNCO’s didn’t have shit to do with it

i think ya’ll are all full of sh!t and have never even been in the military. as for aurora you are just like the old crusty retirees in the air force times. move on let me enjoy my career without you s.o.b.‘s impeding on it. the air force is alot better now than it was in the SAC days. don’t believe ask someone that is from barksdale, oh i’m sorry i’ve been here since 2006.

also aurora it could have happened in the SAC days. you even sound unsure with the unlikely comment. if you were so sure of the SAC you would have said it would never have happened. also it was found by an A1C 462 if you know what that is. i know him personally. so do your research before you assume

aurora you do know we report all “issues” , in the SAC days you guys didn’t trust me i work with some SAC guys. they hate the integrity of the new generation Airmen

why is it everytime an issue comes up at a missile base everybody talks about September 5, 2007. i’m tired of hearing about it I have worked like hell since that day

aurora a 462 is a weapons loader

I normally just read the comments and opt not to reply, but having some knowledged about ICBMs. ( 25 years…in SAC, out of SAC, and both as a contractor and government employee.) I at least have a basis for an opinion…Most of us do not know specifically what went wrong, I’m sure it will be discovered, if it hasn’t already. It could be a simple glitch, or something much greater. This said, the real issue with nuclear weapons and the Air Force, but more specifically ICBMs, is that it’s a mission they just don’t want, and accordingly have shorted in every way for over 20+ years…the net result of this knowing neglect is an old sysytem, poorly maintained, understaffed, and underfunded…most ICBM funding and the minimun improvements needed to even keep it operational have been hard fought, and for the most part underfunded, delayed, and constantly used as a source of funding for nearly every other Air Force pet rock..even though they represent a virtually insignificnat part of the Air Force and overall DOD budget.

The establishment of AFGSC wasto be the “cure all”, but when a major command is established, and it is headed by a three-star, the message is; it’s important, but not all that important..this is not lost on the rest of the Air Force, (and the other services) and most of all all the other major commands and the “four Star” commanders that will just roll their three star counterpart when it comes to priorties, funding, manning, etc…

ICBMs whether the Air Force likes it or not are critically important to the security of the country. They are the umbrell under which everything else is able to operate, they are secure, prompt, and nearly impossible to destroy short of a major attack on the country…also, in the big scheme of things they are dirt cheap to operate and maintain as compared to nearly any other system operated by the DOD…yet they are still the red headed stepchild of the Air Force…untill this mission is again acknowledged and the attitute, resources, and funding are applied to the ICBM mission and sustainment of the weapon system this will continue…regardless of all the lip servcie paid to the nuclear mission, the Air Force is still just playing at it and hoping it will just go away…especiallly ICBMs. Everything I have seen up close and personal for years and years has only served to further validate this unfortunate fact…and unfortuntally I don’t see it ever changing short of just taking the mission away from the Air Force completely and giving it to someone, or creating a seperate organization/agency that actually gives a sh*t…

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement