Skelton Warns Against ‘Extreme’ Views

Skelton Warns Against ‘Extreme’ Views

The words of members of Congress are many and they offer them to us as their currency. Many times it is a currency devalued by overuse, obvious hunger for attention, partisan silliness or plain irrelevance to most people’s lives. Today, Rep. Ike Skelton, outgoing chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, offered the nation his final speech from the floor of the House of Representatives and it is a fine speech. No Gettysburg Address perhaps, but Skelton spoke simply and with some eloquence about how polio challenged him, about the dangers our nation faces, about a “hollowed out” political center he fears may hamper Congress’ ability to do the crucial job of overseeing and guiding the military. But mostly he spoke to us about the pride and gratitude he still feels after serving in Congress for a remarkable 34 years. That is something worth remembering and thinking upon, especially in these days of fiscal fear when we face two wars.

We offer our readers Skelton’s speech in its entirety:

Madam Speaker, I rise today to express my gratitude for the honor of serving in the U.S. House of Representatives and to share a few thoughts as I prepare to leave this distinguished body. About this time 34 years ago, my wife, our three boys, and I were surrounded by scores of well-wishers organized by Bob Welling as we boarded a train in Warrensburg, Missouri, to travel to Washington, DC. Shortly thereafter, I was sworn into Congress. I arrived eager to tackle the problems of the day and represent the people of the Fourth Congressional District. It was a political highlight for me.


GRATITUDE

The Roman orator Cicero said that “Gratitude is the greatest of all virtues,” and I am grateful to so many people.

First, I am extremely grateful and appreciative to the residents Missouri’s Fourth Congressional District whose votes allowed me to serve as their representative in the U.S. House for 34 years. Representing the Fourth District in the House has been a tremendous privilege.

I also want to thank my family whose support made it possible for me to serve in Washington – Susie, my late wife, my three wonderful sons, and my lovely, understanding, and supportive wife Patty.

I want to thank my friends and mentors in Congress. I can’t name them all, but I want to particularly single out the great Missouri legislators Congressman Dick Bolling, who helped me land a seat on the Armed Services Committee, and Congressman Dick Gephardt and Congressman Bill Emerson, who were my car pool partners and my great friends. I leave with enormous respect for all those Members who worked their hearts out to help people at home and to help steer our country’s path while performing their Constitutional duty.

Finally, I want to thank my dedicated staff, past and present. The talented people who have worked in my Missouri offices, my Washington, DC office, on my Small Business subcommittee staff, and on the staff of the House Armed Services Committee, are the unsung heroes who get the business of government done, and I can’t thank them enough for being part of my staff and serving the American people so well.

I’ve led a charmed life in many ways, but as a youngster I learned that a person’s life can change forever in an instant. After contracting polio, I was fortunate to receive treatment at the Warm Springs Foundation in Georgia. Polio affects each person differently, but all Warm Springs patients learned valuable lessons about life – never let illness define you, never be limited by the expectations of others, never give up, and never stop working. By applying the belief that nothing is impossible if you work hard, thousands of Warm Springs alumni, including myself, have led happy and productive lives.

Growing up, I was inspired by my father’s runs for statewide office and for Congress, and also by his service as Lafayette County prosecuting attorney. I had just completed my own term as Lafayette County prosecutor and was practicing law when President Truman called to ask me to consider running for Congress in 1962. In 1976, I decided to run for Missouri’s Fourth District House seat and I have been on the ride of my life ever since.

BIPARTISANSHIP

It is a great honor to serve in the U.S. House. This House is filled with principled public servants who work hard to give voice to the needs of voters back home. Members of Congress bring the theory of representative democracy to life every time they participate in House business and every time they listen to the hard-wrought concerns of their neighbors.

As a member of the House Armed Services Committee, I aspired to become Chairman one day. Serving as Chairman is undoubtedly the high point of my political career.The HASC family of Members and staff is very special. Members of Congress lucky enough to serve on this committee have traditionally worked in a far less partisan atmosphere than on other committees. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution grants Congress the obligation to raise and support Armies and to provide and maintain a Navy. All Members approach this important work very seriously, with the goals of protecting our nation’s security and also doing what is right for our men and women in uniform and their families.

American politics through the ages have frequently been rough and tumble, and at times some might even say mean. But to my mind, national security transcends politics. In the realm of national security, we must make the effort to work together in a bipartisan way, to stand before our allies and the world as a united front, to strengthen our nation’s defenses under the banner of consensus.

As Chairman, I have always sought to maintain this bipartisan atmosphere, and I hope the culture instilled by many HASC chairs who served before will carry on under the leadership of the new chair in the coming Congress. I am confident it will.

Throughout our country’s history, the nation has experienced many challenges. We have had economic crises, agricultural hardships, and military engagements, and Members of this body responded to each one as it came along. I am proud to have been a Member of the House of Representatives and I will always cherish my service here.

I leave with some anxiety for the future, however. In the past, this body has worked best after great debates, when men and women of strong principles have met and compromised on those difficult issues, which at the time could render us asunder. But through meeting in the center and solving the problems of the day, our country benefitted. It was able to progress.

As a result of the last election, the center has been hollowed out and more Members will represent extreme points of view, which is likely to make meaningful compromise difficult, if not impossible. Once again, our system of government and our citizenry will be tested, and the outcome will determine, borrowing the eloquent words of President Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, “whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure.”

When returning Members and new Members arrive at the Capitol for the new Congress in January, they will confront enormous challenges as they work to chart the course for our country in the days ahead. These challenges include the economy and jobs, health care, and education, to name a few. But I implore our citizens and our leaders not to forget that we are a nation at war. Unless our government protects our national security, none of these other important issues can receive the attention they deserve.

CIVIL-MILITARY GAP

National security must be our number one priority. I believe all Americans’ good intentions support the troops and their families. But those intentions must be reflected in action – and Congress bears the Constitutional responsibility to fulfill this sacred duty.

My greatest concern is that a chasm will develop between those who protect our freedoms and those who are being protected. I’ve often talked about what I perceive to be a civil-military gap, a lack of understanding between civilians and the military that has grown in the era of an all-volunteer force. For those not in uniform or connected to the military in some way, it’s easy not to relate to our service members’ difficulties as they deal with the trials of war and combat, multiple deployments, family separations, missed birthdays, and other sacrifices too numerous to mention.

As a nation, we must strive to narrow that gap and bring our citizens together. United we stand, divided we fall. The men and women in uniform who form the backbone of our security cannot devote their all to protect us if we fail to provide what they need to perform their missions, stay safe in the field, and take good care of themselves and their families at home. Keeping America safe demands a national commitment to maintain military readiness. During my time in Congress, the United States has been involved in 12 conflicts, some large and some small. If the future is anything like the past, conflicts, natural disasters, and other crises will frequently pop up without warning. Preparedness is essential.

Today’s forces are the latest in a long line of sentinels of freedom. Our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines must have no doubt about the high value we place on their service. Our commitment to our service members and their families will also help the next generation understand that these patriotic volunteers are critical to the survival of our nation. To protect America’s future, we must inspire the next generation to join the noble service of these ranks.

I’ve always considered each young man and woman in uniform as a son or daughter. They are national treasures and their sacrifices cannot be taken for granted. They are not chess pieces to be moved upon a board. Each and every one is irreplaceable. Issues of national security and war and peace are too important to lose sight of the real men and women who answer our nation’s call and do the bidding of the Commander-In-Chief.

You can’t do the job as a Member of Congress for so many years unless you love it, and I do. It is a labor of love, and to paraphrase my fellow Missourian Harry Truman, I’ve done my damndest every single day. I will be forever grateful for the trust Missourians have placed in me through the years and for the opportunity to serve Missouri’s Fourth Congressional District, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the United States of America.

As I leave this House, these lines from Alfred Lord Tennyson’s poem “Ulysses” express my feelings very well:

“Much I have seen and known; cities of men

“And manners, climates, councils, governments…

“And drunk delight of battle with my peers…

“Some work of noble note, may yet be done…

“Come, my friends,

“‘Tis not too late to seek a newer world.”

Madam Speaker, thank you for this time and I yield back.

Join the Conversation

I read stuff like this everyday in the Washington Post. It’s getting old.

So in summary — Keep the pork flowing no matter how much we have to pawn to the Chinese.

Skelton is a self serving phoney.

Drake1,

You must read a different newspaper than the one I get…

What a mean-spirited attack on a man expressing his gratitude to the nation. This is the problem with political discourse today. Short-sighted and mean-spirited name calling.

Read the Op eds. Daschle was saying much the same thing the other day.

On Leadership: Tom Daschle on the Majority-Minority flip http://​www​.washingtonpost​.com/​w​p​-​d​y​n​/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​v​ide…

I think Congressman Skelton was sincere and that his own remarks about bipartisanship are not themselves motivated by partisanship. Skelton walked that walk, not just talked the talk. Compromise is another issue altogether. Virtue’s golden mean doesn’t always consist in splitting the difference. One has to take a stand, when confronted with stupidity, indifference and malice. I think Ike Skelton was an honest man who knew who and what he represented. What more do we want from these people ?

Maybe I am wrong but I Thought that Congress pays the bills and the House Armed Services Committee monitors the military on how that money is spent for congress. He should leave the Military leaders we already have in place i.e. Sec. Defense, Joint Chiefs and not to forget the commander in chief “The President” to over see and guide the military. I know Congress declares war and such, but when he makes a statement “He fears may hamper Congress’ ability to do the crucial job of overseeing and guiding the military” that’s what’s wrong with our Congress today to many chiefs and not enough Indians. Everyone wants to be in charge, do the job you were elected to do” Take care of your constitutes” The people that pay your salary and if one of those happens to be in the Military then step in other wise step out. I am not saying they shouldn’t,’ support the troops and monitor the goings on, just leave the crucial job of overseeing and guiding the military to the leaders in place.

Dodd decries hyper-partisanship in Senate farewell speech http://​www​.washingtonpost​.com/​w​p​-​d​y​n​/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​a​rti…

Military does not make policy, it carries it out. The civilian government tells it what to do. When it comes to military strategy and tactics, politicians should keep their noses out. But I see no problem with the Congress “overseeing and guiding” the military. And nobody actually take Oblat seriously.

(1) 30 years as an insider…despite how it was designed to work, the military actually makes policy and decides its budget and the President and OMB carry it out. Look at the QDR. It says the military wants to do everything, everywhere, and we need more money to do it. What we need is a strong leader. We haven’t had that under either Democratic or Republican presidencies lately. (2) The Armed Service Committees set military policy and approve a spending (budget) guideline. The Appropriations Committees decide spending (often ignoring the Armed Services Committee recommendations).

I spent 27 years in the military. I was spat on while wearing the uniform. It was a time when we as servicemen doubted the capability of our leaders. I had large doubt of the value politicians put on my service. Like Nixon and Johnson., neither seemed to care about the soldier. Neither seemed smart enough to do the job. Not did their henchmen.
Seems to me like ole Ike knows what the future could hold if military retirees told young people the perils of joining the military for an ungrateful politician. I think he knows a volunteer force could dry up real quick. It is too bad that so few politicians have military service.

I see you don’t know or understand what their job is. The President is not a free agent doing all as he pleases. He can start wars but he needs Congresses approval to continue them and to fund them and for Congress to declare a war.

We have a three tiered system of balance and counter balance. It’s a shame it isn’t working as it should and we now have liberally extreme judges trying to legislate from the bench.

Congress does oversee the President with the troops and many other things as they should, to prevent one man from taking over like a dictator to do anything he wants to with the country like Chavez id doing with Venezuela.

Everyone that is capable of military service should be required to serve so they would have a better understanding and appreciation for the job our military does and has to do. I don’t think we’d have so many liberal bleeding hearts if we did. I’m exceptionally proud of my military service and coming from a democrat background I was taught to be an informed and free thinking Independent AMERICAN who supports my country rather than just the rhetoric of a party. I personally am forced to lean more towards the conservatives as the liberals head for the extreme. In my view and experience Republicans want us all to WORK and succeed together whereas the Democrats want to do to us and RULE us all taking our rights, our resources and our power to control our lives as they think only they are smart enough to spend our money and tell US what to do because they think WE THE PEOPLE are too stupid to do it our own way. Thank God the Military taught me to think for myself and my country and to break the shackles of the plantation mentality of the Democrats whose enforcement arm was the KKK. It’s sad so many are distracted into giving up their money and their right to control their own lives for the lies of the liberals and a pittance of a “free handout” that in reality we all PAY FOR and so much MORE. Like the Masters giving the slaves a free drink of water and trying to make the slaves think they’ve really gotten something of value for their servitude. Maybe we should be grateful to them also for the air we breathe? I think NOT.

Those who are bashing Ike Skelton obviously have no idea of who the man is. He is a highly respected Congressman in the State of Missouri. He is revered by Democrat and Republican alike in this state, and is very highly thought of by military servicemembers. He was a true leader and knew when to hold his ground and when to compromise to get the work of the HASC and the House done. He is of the generation of Congressmen who knew how to get something done, instead of the “my way or we won’t let anything happen at all” idiots we have now. Congress cannot move forward without compromise, and he was spot on when he stated his fear that the moderates are now gone and the far left and right will just bicker and fight without compromise, and the work of our Congress will come to a halt.

Where is the highest common denominator these days? I love intelligent discourse, but sometimes I think there should be a comprehension test in order to comment on some issues in these times. Are we not sick of reactionary rhetoric to an intellectual pause, that is required to comprehend great ideas? Those of you who understand what I just said, thank you, for your participation in a better world.

I agree 100%.

Before we nominate “Ike” for sainthood, could someone–anyone–answer these few questions?

How did “Ike” vote on OBAMACARE?

How did “Ike” vote on our 1 Trillion Dollar Stimulus Bill that didn’t stimulate?

How did “Ike” vote on “Cap and Tax”?

If he supported any, or all of those diasters, then obviously the people were several terms too late in retiring him.

What say you?

Perhaps it should be a rule that to be elected to Congress, one must have served in the U.S. military for at least two years. Then our Congresspeople would REALLY understand what defending our country means.

If nothing else…this should be the primary work of our representatives, defending our nation from all enemies, foreign and domestic…not meddling in “social engineering and justice, which are at the root of the hyper-partisianship that is currently obstructing any real solutions to our governmental problems.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement