Wanted: Space Strategy

Wanted: Space Strategy

So says a group of civilian space experts who today urged the United States to adopt a national space strategy that would unify U.S. government efforts in the final frontier.

Aimed at reducing redundancy and guiding government agency policies and investments, the Secure World Foundation’s National Space Strategy Project seeks the establishment of a space strategy taking into account the nation’s military, civilian government and commercial space needs in a way that reflects the county’s overall strategic goals, said the project’s principal investigator Eligar Sadeh during a press conference today in Washington to unveil the project.

Within that context, the strategy would focus on addressing challenges associated with space launch, the space industrial base, space assurance and space governance, said Sadeh. All of this would make it easier for the White House and Congress to ensure the nation’s various space faring agencies are working in a coordinated manner that advances the national interests with regards to space, according to Sadeh.


While the U.S. has a national space policy, that document does not provide guidance to programs on how to execute their missions in the context of the U.S.’ overall space interests, said Sadeh.

“A strategy is the link between policy and programs,” said Sadeh.  “We have a policy but that policy does not provide the guidance and accountability that we need for the [government’s space] programs and projects and the strategy can fill that gap.”

Such an effort will not only make organizing government efforts in space easier, it will help prioritize space technology investments in a tight fiscal environment, in part, by focusing on which capabilities are most urgently needed.

“The U.S. military space endeavor needs to recapitalize programs across the board, but there’s not enough money to do all that,” said Sadeh. “So, how do we trade off, how do we prioritize? The strategy can establish the top level guidance and accountability we need to accomplish that.”

Finally, the strategy must factor in the behavior and priorities of the rapidly increasing number of nation’s in space.

“We need to think of space strategy as an interdependent choice, the choices we make are going to affect others and vice versa, they’re going to react in a certain way,” said Sadeh. “Space is clearly a globalized endeavor with a number of space powers, a number of emerging space powers world-wide.”

All of this must be done with regards to ensuring all space faring nations behave in a way that allows for the long-term use of space for all, added Sadeh. This also includes developing plans to protect U.S. space assets and capabilities from attack, noted Sadeh.

Join the Conversation

wouldn’t it be nice…

The reality is that the civilian space industry is almost dead. There simply isn’t the money anymore for the large PR exercises that was the manned space program and nobody cares about the rest. All that is left is some hobbyist scale commercial ventures and the military program.

These guys are just trying to embarrass the government into channeling some funds to a civilian program by telling everyone what is going on by explaining what the strategy is.

NASA is desperately trying to find life on another planet as a reason to exist. I’m sure Bill will suggest they should just fake it. And who knows it might work.

In the world of Oblat, is anything not doomed / failing?

I do wonder what sort of worthless cause Comrade Oblatski would rather spend on.

Maybe one day they’ll find brain activity inside the beltway?

Rather than wasting money to find aliens in space they should be using those funds to find all the illegal aliens right here in the US and load all of them on a rocket to send back home.

Good thing that Christopher Columbus, Lief Eriksson, John Glenn and all the other explorers didn’t think this way. Just because you can’t imagine it today, doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be planning for the future!

That may be, but even at todays prices you could buy quiet a few very nice (much nicer than the nins — pinta– or santa maria) sail boats for the cost of one space craft. Besides if our government finds someplace else to live they will just go there and leave us behind if things get really bad, the underground semi city bunkers they have is bad enough let alone another planet. Just immagine the ones in power that lead us down the road to total collapse or destruction are the ones responsible for ensuring thier suvival in order to re establish the government when it is safe to come out of the bunker or if they have it thier way, return to earth. NAH spy sats OK, but space exploration I can do without because it only leads to more exploitation of the general publics taxes.

Christopher Columbus was looking for a quicker trade route to India so that he could corner the world spice market.

Leif Eriksson wanted to find new things to pillage.

John Glenn went where he was ordered to go and had a team of thousands plus a Presidential mandate. It’s not like he built the Mercury-Atlas stack in his garage.

There is a lack of money not waste. But Bill cant get his head around that. In fact I doubt Bill can tell the difference.

Oblat anything not going into your pocket is waste in your eyes.

wow, didn’t realize oblatski was pulling a double shift over here. must be real worried about the imminent cuts at the commie spy apparatchik

I think the future belongs to private civilian space initiatives. NASA is already seeing the writing on the wall with the contract to Space X. Private enterprise will think up a way to make a buck out of space, and that will be enough to start exploration of all kinds. Maybe the government should get entirely out of the civilian side. If they are going to keep NASA, they ought to ask Burt Rutan to head the agency. He would get their priorities straight!

In that model, the only thing the government will be worried about is — once again — regulating space — after all we don’t want too much space junk up there do we?!

the 1st comment said it all!
Wouldn’t it be nice !

Eh, Columbus and Ericksson had commercial interests in mind. Sure, the adventure and exploring was fun, but “show me the money!” was the driving theme. Sorry to bust any bubbles. Not true of Mr. Glenn as far as I know.

Hilton has already put the money away to build a space hotel, as soon as the launch price goes below a certain amount. I don’t remember what is was per pound, but I bet it’ll happen; maybe not in my lifetime. But then, I’m probably not going to live much longer!

Rutan’s company is already building a space rocket, based on their successful X prize design, that will take paying citizens into space for joy rides. The ball is already rolling.

Interesting! What does it cost to join this Secure Space Foundation?

Where can I apply?

If you mean a job:
http://​www​.spacex​.com/​c​a​r​e​e​r​s​.​php

Don’t bother, if you have gualifications they tell you there are lots of others with the same qualifications and decline your application. I know I tried. I’ve worked in the space industry for many years. I applied and was quickly denied. SpaceX is looking for young people, not the experienced older folk with space industry qualifications.

“SpaceX is looking for young people, not the experienced older folk with space industry qualifications.”

That’s not my understanding. What they won’t do, I hear, is pay senior retired workers their old high salaries, ’cause they truly can’t afford it. They very clearly have some experienced old hands around there. Are they getting stock options, maybe, to go along with their (smallish) salaries?

There is always Scaled Composites or have a dozen other companies coming onto the scene. You have to sell yourself to get any job you’ve targeted. These jobs are no different. The job market is saturated for now, but won’t be if the economic indicators keep looking bullish, like they are now.

Oblat — sorry, I accidentally clicked on thumbs up!!! No one really clicked on thumbs up, just wanted you to know. I would click on thumbs down several times if Colin permitted it.

I did give William C and Philo both a thumbs up to make up for my mistake.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement