Bipartisan Senate Letter Urges KC-X Investigation

Bipartisan Senate Letter Urges KC-X Investigation

UPDATED: EADS NA Statement Welcomes Investigation

Seven senators from both parties called on the Pentagon’s Inspector General today, urging him initiate and investigation into what harm might have been done when Air Force officials mistakenly handed Boeing and EADS NA each other’s data about the KC-X tanker competition.

Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), and Pat Roberts (R-Kansas) signed the letter.


“At a minimum, we know that the IFARA [Integrated Fleet Aerial Refueling Assessment] score was compromised. That is why it is critical that your investigation determine whether the data breach compromises the IFARA adjustment to price, and more broadly, whether the data breach creates an unfair competitive advantage for the bidder that looked at the other bidder’s proprietary,” they wrote to Inspector General Gordon Heddell. “We are requesting an investigation because we want to make sure the Procurement Integrity Act, Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), and ethics rules have not been violated.”

“Today’s hearing did not get at the core of the problem,” Cantwell said. “The tanker competition is a price competition, and EADS saw Boeing’s proprietary data. What happened here is that EADS looked at Boeing’s IFARA score, which is used by the Air Force to adjust a bidder’s initially proposed price. EADS now has an unfair competitive advantage to adjust its bid to undercut Boeing.

The day after the hearing, EADS NA issued this statement, welcoming an investigation: “We would welcome an investigation by the DoD Inspector General—if such an investigation does not delay the decision on acquisition of new tankers. Scandal and protest have kept this badly needed system out of the hands of our service men and women long enough. We are interested in illuminating unambiguous facts, not in a tactic for delaying the decision process.” That was issued under the rubric of Ralph Crosby, the company’s chairman of the board.

The senators did not mention in their letter that the Air Force ensured both sides knew what data the other side had received, nor that each company could alter their bids should they wish to do so after having seen that data. Instead, they said that it took the Air Force three weeks to implement the “remedy” for the data swap goof.

Cantwell and the others — most of whom have important Boeing plants in their states — acted after this morning’s Senate Armed Services Committee hearing during which very little new light was shed on the consequences of the data swap. Of course, some close observers of the competition argued that little came out of today’s hearing because the incident has had few consequences beyond scaring EADS that it might have given Boeing another reason to protest and worrying Boeing that its bid might well be weaker than it had thought.

But Cantwell and her colleagues put it this way in her press statement: “The two witnesses present could not even tell the Committee how the leaked IFARA score may impact the overall Air Force competition.”

Most of the hearing constituted restatements of familiar themes. Sen. Clair McCaskill of Missouri, who criticized the tanker program as “a case study in incompetence,” repeated familiar arguments that any company that receives foreign subsidies should have that fact taken into account when it competes for a contract. The World Trade Organization, of course, has found that EADS has received illegal subsidies. It has also found in a preliminary ruling that Boeing illegally received subsidies. McCaskill did not mention the fact that Boeing has received American subsidies.

One of the fun moments during the hearing came when Sen. John McCain told SASC Chairman Sen. Carl Levin today that the KC-X hearing should not have occurred, especially so close to the contract award.

McCain was joined in his criticism by several other Republican senators.

Finally, another bill was introduced to influence the tanker competition, this one by the Cantwell and Sen. Jerry Moran, Republican of Kansas. This bill, the Defense Level Playing Field Act (S.189), would require the Pentagon take into consideration “illegal foreign subsidies in the tanker competition that unfairly place American workers at a competitive disadvantage.” No mention of taking into consideration illegal American subsidies, because, of course, they would not hurt American workers — or Boeing.

Join the Conversation

This is a very biased report from the author, Colin Clark. Not once, does Mr. Clark mention EADS and their actions when they received the disc of information from the Air Force. And, I find fault and I am very disgusted with his last “dig” in the very last sentence, toward Boeing. It is obvious that Colin Clark lacks the the ability to write and report the results of a very important Senate Hearing held today.

Good Afternoon Folks,

Let’s see the firm predictions of last Fall by the management of the buzz were that the Tanker Bid would finally go through and Sec. of Defense Gates would be gone. Tuesday is February first.

On to this farce, its nothing more the classic Boeing. Can’t win the bid fair and square, so what, buy Congress. Personally I don’t really know why Boeing bothers with these bids. Let a couple scrubs go through the bidding process and then have Congress award the contract to Boeing at what ever price it wants for a starting price.

I noticed our two girl Senators from California didn’t get in on this. Maybe cutting the jobs of 900 Californians had a bit to do with this.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

From the Government RFP (Section M): “The acceptable offeror with the lowest IFARA fleet effectiveness value will receive a zero dollar adjustment to its TPP (PV)“
Logically, Boeing has a lower IFARA Score than EADS North America (as they are proposing a smaller tanker). Thus, assuming they both looked at the data, EADS knows Boeing’s IFARA adjustment: ZERO (but it has ALWAYS known this…) Now, Boeing knows exactly EADS North America’s IFARA adjustment, and can lower its price accordingly. Clearly in this scenario, Boeing is contestant that gains the most advantage. So what is the point of the hearing????? It is that simple.

JIm C.

We’ve covered the actions of EADS (and Boeing) when they received the disk before. Very little new information surfaced in yesterday’s hearings beyond the Pentagon confirming that the information provided by the two companies appeared to be accurate. In sum: neither company looked at the information for very long (a few minutes — tops) and both companies know what the other company knows it knows.

Bi partisan letter, no more like a Boieng PAC recipeants letter…Come on folks give me a break the KC-10 will be 50 before this thing gets done. EADS will hopefully go to federal court when robbed again, I know it was NG that won the bid last time, but EADS needs to stop playing nice and start threatening some lawsuits. Where is Sen. Sessions and the rest of the Gulf Coast Sen to fight this nonsense?

This has been going on too long, Lets pick a Plane and lets get er done. Too many protests and too little action. Fix your problems and get the KC-X in the Air, The Air Force as well the Navy and Marines need this Tanker.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement