Carter on Mergers: We’re Watching

Carter on Mergers: We’re Watching

Ashton Carter, the Pentagon’s top weapons buyer today emphasized that the DoD will not condone defense industry mergers done for the sake of short term profit over the long term health of the defense industrial base; warning that the Pentagon will keep a close watch on future mergers and acquisitions to ensure they result in long-term good.

Free “market forces will undoubtedly lead to an uptick in the volume of [mergers and acquisitions] and this is normal,” said Carter during a speech at an Aviation Week-sponsored conference in Washington. “For our part, the Defense Department welcomes these adjustments and the need to create overall efficiency. But we require transparency when it comes to all contemplated transactions; we will examine these transactions to ensure the department’s long term interests in a robust and competitive industrial base are not dominated in the near term for one time proposed savings. The potential for organizational conflicts of interests should be avoided and that we have full visibility of the restructuring costs.”

Carter was expanding on comments he made during a speech in New York last week.


He also reiterated a point he made last week; that while small to mid-sized companies will likely be the subject of most mergers, acquisitions and spinoffs, the Pentagon does not want to see any more consolidation of the big time defense firms such as Boeing, Lockheed Martin or Northrop Grumman.

Carter then said that once the dust has cleared and the U.S. defense industry has “right sized” to function in an age of flattened defense spending, the Pentagon will work to keep the industry at that size and ensure its long term health and competitiveness.

The acquisition czar then went on to say that the Pentagon will also have to buy its weapons on the international market, not just from domestic sources due to the fact that when the best weapons can be found abroad, “we owe it to the warfighter” to buy them. Hmm, Does this make anyone else think KC-X?

He also called on foreign nations to open their doors to purchasing U.S. weapons in a similar manner.

Join the Conversation

How come he left out ATK — BAE — GD and a few others who have been known for preparing bids for smaller independent companies and then conviently buying them after the contract award or right before. I think as usual he is venting a lot of hot air considering there are no covert units watching this from the inside and usualy leave out verbage that would null the contract if they are bought out or merged.

The free market forces Carter is talking about is the formation of further monopolies to reduce competition and drive up the costs.

How about when EADS-NA picks up Boeing Defense after EADS-NA wins the Tanker contract. It will be cheaper than building a plant in Mobile. EADS-NA will be able to final assembly in the Boeing modification center in Kansas after taking delivery from Spirit Aerospace. Shucks they can even use the Boeing Workforce to do the assembly and hire Todd Tiahart as their Government Affairs manager now that he isnt in the US House of Representatives any more.

Mr. Carter and the others in senior leadership can’t even properly manage their own house (say F-35 over and over again), so to engage now in deciding the “appropriate size” of our military aerospace industry is hilarious.

Really the size of Mr. Carters mouth can only be exceeded by his gigantic and bloated ego.…

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

AdChoices | Become a fan on and follow us on
© 2013 Military Advantage
A Monster Company.