Tomorrow’s military hybrid vehicles

Tomorrow’s military hybrid vehicles

Hybrid vehicles are coming to a military motor pool near you, write Paul McLeary and Kimberly Johnson in AvWeek, but it’ll be awhile before they actually make their way onto a battlefield. The military stands to save billions of dollars by operating fleets that get better fuel economy, but first it has to overcome deep skepticism about tomorrow’s more complicated vehicles, they write. The first step will be operating hybrids in non-tactical fleets — rolling around at home or inside the wire — and then, theoretically, someday armored vehicles could operate with dual-power engines, or fuel cells, or other kinds of alternate technology.

Per Paul and Kim:

While the need to reduce the military’s fuel consumption has never been greater due to rising fuel prices and the budget crunch the Pentagon is facing, the path forward for acquisitions is littered with new technology slow to tempt the old guard. The mindset of the military regarding fuel efficiency is different than on the commercial side, says Mike Mekhiche, BAE Systems director of parallel drive systems. “There are cultural hurdles that need to be overcome.”


There are both benefits and drawbacks, they continue:

Significantly, for a ground force that increasingly relies on small electronics like night-vision equipment, handheld radios, biometric systems and metal detectors to sniff out buried roadside bombs, hybrid trucks carry their own generators and can export power. The ability to export power, makers say, creates a huge draw for hybrid technology, which is considered a force multiplier by being capable of generating enough power to run a forward operating base for 2–3 days.

Still, the image of the Army’s fleet of tactical vehicles running hybrid engines on the battlefield anytime soon might need to be put on hold, says Paul Skalny, director of the Army’s Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center’s (Tardec) National Automotive Center. “The fielding of hybrids will be in the non-tactical world” first, he says. “A fuel-cell hybrid in a tactical situation is something that may happen, but quite some time from now. You may see a fuel cell auxiliary power unit (APU) in a vehicle [but] it will be some time [before it is fielded on a battlefield], because we have issues” with exposing an APU to battlefield dirt, which “would kill an APU.”

So even in tomorrow’s high-tech, green force, it appears the Army and Marines will still have plenty of uses for old-fashioned internal combustion engines.

Join the Conversation

Philip – thanks for the interesting recap of the AvWeek story. You make some great points about the overwhelming benefits of hybrid propulsion on the Battlefield.

You make it seem, however, that hybrid combat vehicles are some distant vision. In reality, hybrid propulsion is a mature technology and its military application is long overdue. It’s been used for decades on trains, buses and heavy industrial equipment. The Army and OSD’s own evaluation of the technology during FCS determined that the technology was mature and appropriate for application to combat vehicles now. At BAE Systems, we have a mature design that is being integrated today to deliver low-risk approach to bring the benefits of hybrid to the battlefield when the Army fields the GCV in 2017.

Mark Signorelli

Vice President, BAE Systems

Wow! The video of the Hybrid drive M-113 has only been on You tube for 7 years now. Faster than and lower profile than a BFV, better Armored than a Stryker, and comes in fully amphibious models too. Plus we(the US Army) already own 8000+ of the basic vehicles ready for retro fit, bought and paid for 100%. Great scouting system over there at DOD.

Must be nice high stepping through technology and avoiding the obvious. The military is one unit and runs on a common fuel supply. Changing technology in fuel requires that the fuel supply can be obtained on the battlefield and in this case that is crude oil and its by products. So what other possible sources are available on the battlefield? To my knowledge, that would would be bio fuel. I know that this technology is being now researched by aircraft manufactures for the replacement of jet fuel. So, that will take time. Until then, we have no alternatives. That is unless, the government gets involved in the research and end this oil drinking monster.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement