Australia to buy 24 MH-60R helos

Australia to buy 24 MH-60R helos

The Australian navy will buy 24 MH-60R Seahawks for use as its new “multi-role combat aircraft,” the Navy announced Thursday, a coup for U.S. foreign military sales, Sikorsky, Lockheed Martin and the other big vendors that help build the aircraft. It’s the first time a foreign customer has opted for the R-model Seahawk, and it’s the culmination of a big push by the Navy and its “industry partners,” in the Pentagon phrase, to get the latest, newest American naval helicopter out into the hands of a key Pacific ally.

“The MH-60R Romeo helicopter will fill a critical maritime warfare capability for the Royal Australian Navy,” said Rear Adm. Steven R. Eastburg, the Program Executive Officer, Air, ASW, Assault and Special Mission programs, in the Navy’s announcement. “U.S. naval forces have found the Romeo platform to be an operationally effective and reliable first responder for all missions and contingencies encountered at sea around the world.”

The $3 billion deal also gives Lockheed a new foothold in Australia, as the company said in its announcement: “Team Romeo principals Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., a subsidiary of United Technologies Corp. and Lockheed Martin have co-developed and delivered maritime helicopters for the U.S. Navy for more than 35 years. They are teamed with engine manufacturer GE Aviation, sonar and sensor provider Raytheon Company, and training and simulator provider CAE for the Phase 8 competition. In addition to delivering Romeo helicopters, the team plans to bring long-term jobs and work opportunities to Australian industry valued at $1.5 billion over 10 years.”


The defense industry hopes that anti-submarine warfare equipment remains a growth market around the Pacific, as navies feel they must update their fleets to keep pace with China’s growing sub fleet. Or as Australia’s Department of Defence put it in its own announcement:

The 2009 Defence White Paper committed the Government to equipping naval warships with a new combat helicopter capable of conducting a range of maritime missions with advanced anti-submarine warfare capabilities and the ability to fire air-to-surface missiles. This announcement delivers on that commitment …

Acquisition of 24 ‘Romeos’ means that Navy will have the capacity to provide at least eight warships with a combat helicopter at the same time, including ANZAC Class frigates and the new Air Warfare Destroyers. The remainder will be based at HMAS Albatross in Nowra, New South Wales, and will be in various stages of the regular maintenance and training cycle. They will be equipped with a highly sophisticated combat systems designed to employ Hellfire air-to-surface missile and the Mark 54 anti-submarine torpedo.

According to the deal, the Aussies will get their first helos in 2014.

Join the Conversation

Smart move by the RAN.

Yes

Smart move all right. The Romeo is already operational, there will be quick delivery times, effective supply chain in place and low risk as all proven technology. While the NFH has advantages, it is still developmental, there are delays in production lines on the base NH90 and very poor supply chain. Not to mention that this makes interoperability between the RAN and USN a breeze.

It also has the least possiblity of the dysfunctional DMO running into the ditch on project management/sustainment. That by itself is s win.

The ADF has has nothing but trouble with their Euro purchases — Tiger helos, nh-90, a330. And they also screwed up a Sea Sprite purchase.

On the other hand the M1 Abrams, C-17 and Super Hornet FMS buys have all been good.

“While the NFH has advantages” said Aussie Observer.
What are the pros of the NFH over the MH-60R?

To Locum
1. Geater mission endurance about 4 hrs vs 3 hrs (and probably mission radius)
2. NFH-90 ENR radar appears to have air-air mode which APS-147 does not — important for small Navy without other organic AEW such as E-2.
3. Marte missile with >30Km(potential to 100K) range vs Hellfire about 8 Km
4. Greater engine power for heavy lifting — also MH-60R apparently no lift hook
5. Spares commonaliity with Army /RAN MRH-90
6. Releasability of source code to make national modifications.

1. The fuel fraction is a good indication for range. MH-60R has a fuel fraction of 0,2591. NFH90 has a fuel fraction of 0,2284 = 12% less.
2. ENR radar air to air mode = great. Remember that the British developed an Sea King AEW with the Searchwater radar in 11 weeks because of Falkland war experience.
3. SH-60B has Penguin anti ship missile capability. The new stealthy Naval Strike Missile is a bit (± 30 kg / 66lbs) heavier than the Penguin, but has a range of 100+ nm. I think it is not that hard to integrate this 400kg / 880lbs NSM on the MH-60R.
4. Powerloading MH-60R = 3,07 kg/hp — 6.78lbs /hp. Powerloading NFH90 = 2,38 kg/hp — 5.25lbs/hp = 22% better. The MH-60R does have a cargo hook with 6,000 lbs capacity.
6. Releasability of source code for national modifications. Great, LM or any other US Def. company won’t give this.

The MH-60R can also carry a quad Hellfire rack for use against small boats and such. It’s a nice capability to have.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement