Having wasted $31B, DoD vows to improve contracting

Having wasted $31B, DoD vows to improve contracting

The Pentagon vowed Wednesday that it’s getting better at handling war zone contracting after a congressionally appointed panel announced DoD has lost some $31 billion to waste and fraud in Iraq and Afghanistan. The total amount lost could end up as high as $60 billion, depending on the outcomes of projects in both countries going forward. The Commission on Wartime Contracting’s report to Congress makes Monday’s USA Today story about the $720 million in late cargo container fees look like pocket change lost in a car seat.

So here we go — this script is so old and shopworn it would embarrass even the most desperate Burbank hack: According to its statement, the Pentagon shares the commission’s concerns; in fact, it’s grateful to this report for “shining a spotlight on the risks of over-reliance on contractors,” which is the first time in history anyone has ever done so. But, just as when any report about anything comes out, all it does is confirm what leaders already believed, so this is really old news, and besides, DoD has already been implementing a “number of steps” to address these issues, so … problem solved! Nothing to  see here.

For the record, here in full is DoD’s accounting of how it’s improving its “contingency contracting:”


•       Investigation and prosecution of individuals engaging in fraud
•       Increased staffing for contract oversight including having more military personnel in the acquisition corps and increasing the number of contracting officer representatives providing contractor oversight to better prevent and detect fraud
•       Better training for deployed military supervising and interacting with contractor personnel
•       Establishing a Joint Theater Support Contracting Command at CENTCOM
•       Establishing policy and planning requirements for Operational Contractor Support in future contingencies at the Joint Staff and in Departmental guidance
•       Focusing on project sustainability, particularly for the Afghan National Security Forces
•       Increasing competition in contingency contracting by competing a new LOGCAP contract and qualifying more vendors so that under the LOGCAP IV contract there will be ongoing competition between contractors for task orders throughout the contract’s life
•       Increased capacity of the acquisition workforce since 2009 as part of a deliberate Department-wide initiative to rebuild the acquisition workforce.
•        DoD created and filled 9,000 new acquisition workforce positions, strengthening the contracting workforce and contributing to rebuilding the Defense Contract Management and Defense Contract Audit Agency.

Although DoD’s announcement didn’t say this specifically, there is one final point under the official Embarrassing Report Response Doctrine, which you should look for among service and DoD officials going forward. A top leader, possibly incoming Deputy Defense Secretary Ash Carter, whose Senate confirmation hearing is Sept. 13, will say that this is a big organization; these things take awhile; you can’t turn on a dime; it takes awhile to turn an aircraft carrier; Rome wasn’t built a day; the check’s in the mail; stop picking on me you bullies — when reporters or lawmakers ask how or when anyone will be able to tell whether anything has actually changed.

What frustrates many observers about the Pentagon’s responses to these reports is they always call for the current system and the current people to work better. No one is fired, there’s no restructuring — instead, the department will rely on the same old miracles: competition, communications and training. Although there are some bigger changes in the works: Over the long term, Carter and other top leaders hope that adding more people to the acquisitions workforce will help it build a corps of professional managers and experts who can learn to run the rodeo better — and then keep it that way.

The question is, will they actually make a difference? And can the department keep adding civilian workers at a time when it’s under such intense budget scrutiny?

Join the Conversation

In other news, despite having failed to ever remain sober, Ralph the hobo vows to moderate his alcohol consumption. He was joined on stage by local attorney turned Congressmen Liar McSayanthing, who stood in solidarity with Ralph promising that he to would make a committment to cleaning up his ways. “I know nothing I’ve ever said was entirely true, and for that I’m sorry. But today begins a bold new era of earnestness, that I promise.”

Took you this long to realize the Military waste money too much? Only some budget cuts will teach them to be better with there money. Cut them for just a few years and it’ll teach them a lesson.

And the Cognressman is proud to announce a new program, employing dozens, which is dedicated to finding and rehabilitating drunk hobos. When asked what would happen when they’d found and rehabilitated every drunk hobo in the city, he replied “I’m sure there will always be drunk hobos, and if we can’t find any then we’ll redefine the terms until we do.”

Good Morning Folks,

In the real world for this kind of embezzlement heads would roll. The FBI would be in a full court press for even for far lessor amounts, the IRS would be knocking down doors and taking away computers, and the stock market would be in a death spiral.

In the DoD theft is just business as usual. No Generals or Admirals will be fired, no program managers with in or out of uniform will be put on trial for breach of fiduciary responsibility to the government. As long as the money goes to defense contractors WGASA?

When the CMC General James Amos make a statement that to many Marines are to busy fighting the War in Afghanistan and not paying enough attention to procurements some is very, very wrong.

What will happen, well Halliburton Brown and Root in Iraq got caught red handed with about $30 billion in billings for work never done, supplies never delivered, duplicate and false billings to the Army, and the Army just paid them and wrote it off to the taxpayer.

How about calling this what it is thievery. How about some Generals/Admirals serving time at Ft. Leavenworth?

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

In order for this to work, the first thing congress and DoD need to realize is that the miitary is for the defense of our country which means killing our enemies rather than trying to make friends of them. If it were possible to be friends with them in the first place then congress already failed or the military wouldnt had been sent in. We need to travel lighter, faster, hit harder and and leave as soon as possible. We also need portable bases that we take in a nd bring out so we dont have to build anything while there to be left behind or hire contractors to build for us. In forieng relations THE US MILITARY SUCEEDS WHERE CONGRESS HAS FAILED TO PREVENT HOSTILITIES.

Stop the centralization! Let the Commanders be responsible and ACCOUNTABLE and they will fix what is broken!
The endless layers of people who have no accountability or skin in the game is a major problem along with people who have minimal if any qualifications. The other side of the deal is many contractors are just poor in performance or quality. Why would you not want to go to someone who you know can do the job with quality and schedule. Far too many who just want the money and cannot perform except sending a letter to some Congressman

Had we had the proper amount of men and women in uniform, we would not have to rely on contracting companies to do the military’s work for them…saving billions in cost over runs and embezzlement fees that we are dearly paying now.

So, has anybody ever did a study on how the War Department back during WWII got things done? I mean the Pentigon wasn’t around back then…could it be it’s the House of Failure? Just how many people were there in the War Department back in the 1940’s to run a Huge World War, compared to the Pentigon now days and running these war on Terror/Insurgencies? Did they know something back then that we don’t know now? Discounting the Huge secrterial pools in the War department…what was the body count?
With all the talk of reductions, then lets reduce. Get rid of most of the Burocracy, Combine the Army and Air Force back under One Department, Navy and Marines Under one Department, Hold the Department heads responcible, and Keep it Simple Stupid.
Broke tired worn down taxpayer

There are bad contracts, bad contract oversight, and bad contractors!!!? Stop the presses! We should keep everything in-house, shut-off the global economy (since the western world free-rides off of our military efforts, it makes sense to kill our own economic growth more with more military stuff, more overseas presence, more Globo-policing — see pragmatic European construction contractors lining up for Libya).

We should be like North Korea and produce everything in our borders by trustworthy, low-cost, productive, Government Personnel.

Some amazing historical insight:

“During the Civil War, corrupt military contractors were defrauding the United States Army out of hundreds of thousands of dollars and putting troops at risk by supplying troops with defective products and faulty war equipment. Illegal price gouging was a common practice and the armed forces of the United States suffered. In response, Abraham Lincoln enacted the Federal Civil False Claims Act. A key provision of the act was known as qui tam.”

http://​www​.texaslawyers​.com/​c​o​o​m​e​r​/​g​o​v​e​r​n​m​e​n​t​c​orr…

SO WHY IS THIS HAPPENING ????? BECAUSE SOME ONE DOES NOT WANT TO BE ACCOUNTABLE >!PREPOSTIONING VERIFABLE CONTRACTORS /PROCURMENT PROTOCOL CHANNELS >NOT JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE LIKE OLD DICK CHENEY RELATED WITH BUZZ TRASITIONS >.HAVING PRPOSITIONED FOREIGN CONTRACTORS ARE ACCOUNTABLE TAKING ON CONTRACTS FOR MILITARY OP,S WITH DOUBLE COVER OVER SIGHT » OVER SIGHT OF ACCOUTABLE ITY OF WHERE THE FUNDS START –N– END UP AT» TESTING –N– OF CONTRACT PROCURMENT OF EQUIPMENT — BE ACCOUNT ABLE OF DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT ..HOW CONTRACTS CAN BE RECOOP LOSES OF DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS

you don’t have to look to far to know that open end contract’s in the government are unheard of,until the Bush-Cheney debacle when all that changed for Kellog,Brown and Root and Haliburton.And guess who was the president of those companies?None other than DICK CHENEY.Does anyone smell a rat here!

guess it’s harder to hire/retain skilled personnel in the MIL when they are NOT compensated at levels commensurate with the private sector… now everyone wants to reduce their retirement benefits for all of their service.

Won’t be long will everything is outsourced.…

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement