Boeing delivers 1st Block III Apache

Boeing delivers 1st Block III Apache

The Army took delivery of its first AH-64D Apache Block III attack helicopter on Wednesday, Boeing announced, the latest upgraded variant of the classic  helo.

The Army has found it very difficult to design, build and field whole new helicopters, so it has tried to squeeze every last drop from the basic Apache design, which is getting onto almost 30 years old these days.

No matter, say the Army’s aviation officials — today’s Block III variant is still the baddest kid on the block. Per Boeing’s announcement:


“This is a remarkable achievement by a great Army-industry team, a giant leap for U.S. Army aviation, and a signal to aggressors around the world that the Apache continues its legacy as a formidable and highly effective weapon system,” said Col. Shane Openshaw, U.S. Army Apache project manager. “I am proud to witness this program milestone achievement and honored to be part of the team that designs and builds the Apache attack helicopter. I know the value this aircraft brings to soldiers on the ground and in the air who defend freedom daily in combat zones and during peacekeeping missions around the globe.”

The Block III can fly higher and faster than earlier models and it comes equipped with all manner of new combat systems and silicon chips and such. Specifically, as Stripes’ Seth Robson wrote, Block III crews will be able to operate unmanned aircraft from their helicopter cockpits, which Army commanders hope could be a huge asset on the battlefield.

Wrote Robson:

The Apache will be the first aircraft where the pilots will be able to control drones, according to Lt. Col. Dan Bailey, an Apache pilot who is the Army’s project manager for the new attack helicopter. “It’s going to make a significant difference on the battlefield,” Bailey said.

Crews flying the older Apaches often communicate with drone operators by radio during missions, said Bailey, who flew Apache missions in Iraq from 2006 to 2007. “A [drone] operator would talk us through what he was seeing, such as a building where insurgents were shooting from,” he said, “but a picture is worth 1,000 words.”

Crews in the new Apaches will be able to see the same video that a drone operator sees on their screens. They will even be able to take control of a drone to fly it to way points and zoom its cameras and sensors in on targets, he said. “We can use the [drone] as a remote sensor to identify hostiles,” he said. “That [drone] is now part of our Apache but it is forward where we might not want to be. I think it is going to be a huge game changer for the Army.”

It certainly could be — in fact, the Block III could give the Army a helicopter that can serve as the “quarterback of the battlefield” … now where have we heard that before?

Boeing says it will produce 51 Block III Apaches at first under low-rate initial production. Under a roughly $700 million deal with the Army, the ultimate goal is to get to 690 helicopters, both newly built and upgraded from the existing fleet. With this and subsequent upgrades, the Army hopes it can keep its Apaches flying until 2040 — ten years after it hopes to begin operating its new common helicopter.

Join the Conversation

Another reason why tactical strike aircraft should have two crew: operating UAVs. Imagine an F-35 pilot trying to manage two (or more) aircraft at the same time. Makes the F/A-18F and F-15E that much more valuable.

Anti-tank helicopters (like the “Apaches”) were made exclusively for high-intensity conflicts against technologically advanced, conventional armies.

Drones still have to prove their worth against any kind of enemy at all, even against half-naked guerillas waving at them. Especially without aerial supremacy (Libya), ideally without human intelligence on the ground, too (assassinations of Palestinian and Taliban leaders. Why do I still not see drones successfully spotting and targeting ordinary smugglers, drug dealers and guerillas etc. in the Amazon jungle?)

And the U.S. Army calls this TOY PLANE INTERFACE “the latest upgrade” – any “upgrade” at all – of the “Apache” ??
Just say good-bye to the mere thought of invading real First World countries (like “Serbia”) with them…

What other upgrades have they made to the block 3’s?

“The Apache Block III incorporates 26 new technologies designed to enhance the aircraft’s capabilities.

One set of advances are tied to helicopter’s flight performance. They include enhanced –701D engines with improved digital electronic control (DEC); upgraded drive systems including a a split-torque face gear transmission, which increases power throughput by more than 20% (to 3,400 shp) without taking up more room; and a new composite rotor blade. The new rotor blades, which successfully completed flight testing in May 2004, work with the improved engines to increase the Apache’s cruise speed, climb rate and payload.

Overall, the front-line payoff is a higher hover ceiling altitude, at greater gross weight, on a 95 degrees Fahrenheit day. That’s very useful in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.

Block III upgrades are also designed to extend the Apache’s sensor range in all domains, and may be paired with new extended range weapons like the Joint Common Missile.

The current Apache AH-64D Longbow is equipped with the AN/APG-78 Longbow fire control radar, whose use of millimeter wave sensing improves performance under poor visibility conditions and is less sensitive to ground clutter. The short wavelength also allows a very narrow beam-width, which is more resistant to countermeasures as it’s trying to guide the helicopter’s missiles to their targets.

The Apache Block III program will add open systems architecture electronics to create more standardization and “switchability,” extended range sensing, extended-range fire control radar, extended range missiles, wideband network communications for high-bandwidth networking, and high capacity data fusion computers to merge off– and on-board sensor imagery into a single shared picture of the battlefield. The Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) is scheduled to be part of this effort, but continued delays and program restructurings may lead to installation of upgraded versions of the AN/ARC-231 Skyfire system in some aircraft until JTRS isn’t ready.

Other planned electronic enhancements to the AH-64D Block III include advanced “Level IV” control of UAVs from inside the helicopter.

Contracts and Key Events”

Since the AH-64A entered service in the ‘80s, the Apache has often worked in conjunction with the OH-58D Kiowa and other assets that would laser designate targets, allowing the Apache to engage targets with Hellfires without exposing itself.

I’m guessing the AH-64D Block III allows for a very similar capability with certain types of UAVs.

I heard years ago they were planning to upgrade the M230 chain gun, did they ever get around to that?

Incremental development is the way to go — sure it doesn’t generate the super-profits that the contractors anf their trolls but it gets results.

Its just a pity that the whole attack helicopter concept is such a failure. Do we really need all these upgrades when the weapon is simply obsoleted by cheap man-pads.

If you look at the history the whole concept relies on the dubious idea that the European FEBA would be stable and well defined. Translate that to insurgencies an the aircraft become a joke. Jonny Taliban can sit all day on his porch watching drones fly by and then simply pull out the man-pad when the AH-64D Block III turns up.

One of the reasons why we cant do anything about Pakistan — indeed we are currently “seeking terms” with Mullah Omar — is that the pentagon knows that all the Pakistanis have to do is deliver a truck load of manpads to the Taliban to humiliate us.

To the poster “itfunk”

You wrote: “One of the reasons why we cant do anything about Pakistan — indeed we are currently ‘seeking terms’ with Mullah Omar — is that the pentagon knows that all the Pakistanis have to do is deliver a truck load of manpads to the Taliban to humiliate us.”

The “Apache” can’t even defeat some ridge-running hillbillies? (Not even “Block III” ?)

Don’t say us you’re not with us.

The first sentence is perhaps the only intelligent thing I’ve seen in this post, and barely at that. “Drones still have to prove their worth against any kind of enemy at all…” Complete idiocy. In pakistan alone, the mininum statistic is 1680 kills since 2004, largely against high profile targets, killing names such as Ilyas Kashmiri, Baitullah Mehsud, Fateh Al Misri, and others. And the drone interface, even I know that it would increase ground and aerial awareness and effectiveness, coordination, and intelligence on both ground and air teams. I can tell if you are just really ignorant, or just trying to piss people off. Good job if the latter.

Attack helicopters a failure? Their pilots and the combat record of attack helos begs to differ.

The AH-64 has carried IR jammers, flares, and infrared signature reduction systems for a long time. Plus eventually it is going to get DIRCM capable of dealing with even the latest MANPADS groups like your beloved Taliban don’t have access to.

The real question is whether the Block 3’s will be completely fielded, or whether austerity military will direct some type of Block 2/ Block 3 mix.

Itfunk, if it’s that simple to take out an Apache, then why aren’t they doing it?

Hundreds of aircraft deployed, millions of flight hours, thousands of targets destroyed, and barely a handful lost to enemy action — and that’s a failure?

another museum piece, or only for flyby/escort of the NATOSECGEN? where was a bird (comanche?) covering team 6? no good if they aren’t on station.

Its A good thought upgrading the Appache But Its going to get out dated soon

The Block III will have much increased hot and high flying capability, which is much needed.

No one should be discussing the actual upgrades where enemy states can make counter measures for the uprades or else the upgrades are not worth doing, get the hint, shut up.…

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement