Coming soon: Buzz goes to Farnborough

Coming soon: Buzz goes to Farnborough

Can’t make it over to Jolly Olde England for this year’s Farnborough International Airshow? Never fear, gov’na; your friends from DoDBuzz and DefenseTech are on the case.

Although it was tough making the decision to leave behind the sweltering, triple-digit National Capital Region for the cool, rainy English countryside, someone had to do it.

This year the world’s aerospace and defense industries seem to be approaching Farnborough the way coastal residents approach preparing for a hurricane — with the knowledge that a storm is coming, but wondering how bad it will be. North American and European defense budgets are projected to stay flat at best and nosedive at worst, and the Sword of Damocles that has been menacing Washington will likely also cast a long shadow at Farnborough.


We’re expecting to hear a lot about upgrades, improvements and greater value, but not a lot about new programs or advanced concepts — though you never know. We’re also expecting to see a comparatively smaller presence from the big brand-name defense firms, which have made sure everyone knows they’re scaling back what they spend on trade show exhibitions. Northrop Grumman isn’t even playing at all.

Farnborough itself has tried to adapt to the gloomy outlook of its longtime metier, the aerospace world; this year show organizers say they’re expanding the “security” expo, so who knows what kind of non-flying stuff will be on display.

At any rate, check back here and on DefenseTech soon for our total coverage of the international aerospace industry’s hurricane party.

Update: Here was the Pentagon’s announcement Friday about its role in Farnborough:

The Department of Defense will participate in the 2012 Farnborough International Airshow in Farnborough, United Kingdom, from July 9–15, 2012, with presentations by senior officials, static displays and aerial flight demonstrations.

Various models of U.S. military aircraft and equipment and approximately 100 aircrew and support personnel from military bases in Europe and the U.S. are scheduled to attend. Platforms include: the Army LUH-72 Lakota helicopter and ScanEagle unmanned aerial vehicle; Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet and P-3C Orion; the Marine Corps MV-22B Osprey; and several Air Force aircraft including the F-16C Fighting Falcon, C-130J Super Hercules, C-17A Globemaster III, F-15E Strike Eagle, and B-52 Stratofortress.

Participation in the biennial airshow highlights the strength of the U.S. commitment to the security of Europe and demonstrates the contributions the U.S. defense industry offers with various state-of-the-art capabilities vital for the support and protection of our allies’ and partners’ national-security interests.

The show typically attracts approximately 120,000 trade visitors and exhibitors from 40 countries. The availability of U.S. military aircraft, equipment and personnel is based on ongoing U.S. operational requirements and worldwide commitments.

 

Join the Conversation

Dont forget to show the classics with the newest planes Buzz..

I was too distracted by the news that the Russian Air Force is participating in Red Flag this October to care about this article: http://​www​.flightglobal​.com/​b​l​o​g​s​/​t​h​e​-​d​e​w​l​i​n​e​/​201

Too bad China and Russia won’t be showing up with their latest… Good thing we don’t feel any pressure to demonstrate the advantages of capitalism over communism any more. Of course, when you consider that we pay our contractors more to f us over than we do if they provide good weapons on time and on budget, the very fact it takes us 2 or 3 decades to produce any kind of significant weapon now days is a true tribute to the effectiveness of capitalist principles. I’m guessing even as brazen as our defense contractors have become, advertising the great job they’re doing of screwing the US taxpayer would be a bit over the top.

Get help.

Who says the US weapons buying process is capitalistic? Abramov showed that the weapons buying purse strings below to the Capitol Hill Kleptocracy. The DoD acquisition wall chart makes Central planning bureaucracies envious. It takes 20+ years just to navigate the process.

Typical well reasoned argument of someone who enjoys the current, “pay contractors $1.10 for every $1.00 they spend” method of weapons procurement.

MV22B ? Jeez, showing off our biggest airframe disaster and people killer? No shame at all. May God protect those who have to fly or ride in it.

Perhaps I could repeat the military industrial complex’s refrain that it’s some unknown persons in their employ who are writing “gold plated requirements” that have caused our aircraft development periods to go from a few years to a few decades. Oh yeah, no one ever gets tired of that one, do they? Of course, it’s all bs. No one ever produces a person or a “gold plated requirement”. They just keep yapping, because it must be true — or the military industrial complex would have told us otherwise, right?

Go to this link (http://​www​.acq​.osd​.mil/​d​p​a​p​/​d​a​r​s​/​d​f​a​r​s​/​h​t​m​l​/​r​2​0​1​0​1​2​0​8​/​2​1​6​_​4​.​htm) and let me know when the rule changes. When the federal government stops paying defense contractors $1.10 for every $1.00 they spend developing and building new weapons, I’ll be happy to stop criticizing them for doing do. Until then, it’s my money they’re spending and it is my right to be critical of how it is spent, especially when that method rewards incompetence and sloth. No doubt your opinions on that subject will differ.

Single Source Bids. Is that how Lobbyists rake in their commissions? Also, did anyone mention political associations — Single Source Purchases?
Just Curious.

The US has some great products of which it may be justly proud –the Super Hornet, the F16, the many F15 variants, the F22 and yes, the F35 as well as the Osprey. None are cheap, virtually all cost more than was initially predicted (there is a lesson here) –and all will serve the US and its allies and clients superbly when called upon. Please get a little positive and stop harping upon negative points. Some seriously combined pressure to re-open the F22 line might be productive –and both the C130J and beyond, the C17 and even the reworked C5 may prove to be even greater successes. Your political system sucks but your aircraft manufacturing is beyond compare. Get a grip!

Jock Williams Yogi 13

Yeah, pay the military-industrial complex at the same rate you were during the Cold War, and don’t ask where the money is going or why you are getting so few aircraft for your dollar. Just be good little minions and be happy the rich heads of the priviliged defense contractors are able to get richer off your tax dollars. After all, what are your dreams and aspirations compared to theirs? Nothing, that’s what.

They get paid to ensure the current system that pays a contractor more for sloth and stupidity than it does for good weapons developed on-time and on-budget continues for as long as the US taxpayer will put up with it, and maybe just a wee bit longer.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

AdChoices | Become a fan on and follow us on
© 2013 Military Advantage
A Monster Company.