Afghan air force’s wait continues

Afghan air force’s wait continues

Air Force Maj. Gen. Tod Wolters was expansive about the war in Afghanistan, but less so on Tuesday about his new job in getting programs through Congress.

“We’re still working the light air support contract” was how Wolters put it on the long-stalled effort by the Air Force to buy turboprop close-air support aircraft for the Afghan air force.

The Air Force wanted to spend $355 million for 20 A-29 Super Tucano attack planes made by Brazil, but the contract had to be scrapped after Air Force leaders admitted their acquisitions team had made errors in the documentation supporting the award decision.


Hawker Beechcraft, which offered a modified AT-6 training plane, was also in competition for the contract to provide the planes to the Afghan air force.

The ragtag Afghan air force hasn’t been faring much better on getting new rotary aircraft. The Pentagon pushed a controversial $365 million deal for 26 Mi17 helicopters from Rosobornexport, the Russian export firm that is also supplying Syria.

Protests came from Senators and Representatives from both sides of the aisle who demanded the Defense Department buy American. The helicopters have yet to arrive, and Pentagon officials for weeks have declined to say where they are.

When asked about the status of the helicopter deal, Wolters, the new chief Congressional liason for the Air Force, said “I just don’t know.” To be fair, the U.S. Army has taken the lead on this deal.

Wolters spoke in a brief huddle with reporters after addressing the Air Force Association on the air war in Afghanistan, where until May he was commander of the 9th Air and Space Expeditionary Task Force-Afghanistan, and also deputy commander for Air, U.S. Forces-Afghanistan.

Wolters said the coalition suffered a major setback when the Afghan parliament recently moved to sack Defense Minister Abdul Rahim Wardak and Interior Minister Bismillah Mohammadi. President Hamid Karzai has since moved to retain Wardak in his inner circle by making him a senior adviser.

Wolters said a major accomplishment on his watch in Afghanistan came in boosting the daily flying hours for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions.

The Air Force has been flying 600 hours of ISR daily and the Army, with its own ISR platforms, has been doing more than 300 hours, Wolters said. Add in another 300 hours of ISR flown by coalition partner nations and it amounts to more that 1,200 hours daily, he said.

Most of the ISR requested by ground commanders has been in the form of full-motion video, Wolters said.

“It’s pretty powerful stuff,” he said. “Full-motion video has allowed for situational awareness that is better than any previous conflict ever,” Wolters said.

Join the Conversation

“Afghan Air Force” or “Taliban Air Force”. The above presupposes that the the Afghan Air Force will survive in its present form after we leave. I suspect the entire country will revert to pre-US invasion status quo, with the Pashtuns trying to take out everyone else. Oh well.…

But back to the issue of contracting.…anytime you pit a U.S. manufacturer (even one who is doing his level best to sell the commercial side of his business to the Chinese) versus a foreign manufacturer, controversy is bound to ensue. If 10 years of tanker fun didn’t convince DoD of this, I don’t know what will.

The upcoming helo competitions will provide this site with endless grist for future articles.

That’s why I think we may be in Afghanistan for the long haul to make sure the Taliban doesn’t rear it’s ugly head. I think were going to be doing the same program that was done to Germany after WW2. I think the A-29 is not only perfect for the Afghan Air force, but also for the US Air force as a CAS bird, Border patrol bird and on demand ISR bird with strike capability. The only thing the A-29 would need is inflight refueling capability.

The article kind of whizzed by the fact the “documentation” error was passed on to the Justice Dept thttp://defensetech.org/2012/02/28/air-force-cans-super-tucano-light-attack-contract/
and the fact the Texan II wasn’t allowed to compete on a technicality. Ignorance by the writer or a willful attempt to mislead? Don’t know but just want readers to be aware especially if they rely soley on DoDBuzz.

Waste of time. Just buy some SU-25 for the Afghan air force. Or better have them buy there own planes instead of wasting our money for them.

” Where are the Mi17s?”. On the assembly line in Kazan! The Russians won’t deliver without getting paid, rest assured.

You think with all of the retired A-7’s, the Air Force would refurbish them and transfer them to the Afghan AIr Force.

Why are we buying them anything? Let them use their drug money!

Donate some old crop dusters. That’s really all they need.

Don’t buy, lease or donate one bicycle to these idiots. $830 million will be better spent on Paralyzed Veterans of America or Job training for Vets. Get the USAF out of A-stan, they don’t do a whole lot for the Soldiers or Marines in CAS, and now they want you and I to fund CAS planes for the Taiban Government. Time to leave and not leave them one good roll of TP500.

In an entirely unrelated note the US Marine Corp and US Army have scheduled to deliver Avenger air-defense systems to all their units at the same time the Afghan Air Force receives their CAS aircraft.

I wouldn’t allow the transfer, stand up or access to any aircraft, artillery or other heavy weapons systems to any Afghanistan Forces that could potentially be used against coalition forces before they are completely out of theater.

That would be stupid. No amount of pressure by the Afghanistan government or Karzai could get me to allow that and I wouldn’t be afraid to hurt their/his feelings if I had to. The Afghani Forces are not trustworthy or reliable and have no institutional loyalty to the US or Coalition Forces.

Yeah, you give them a rifle and they shoot at you with it. And you wanna give em planes, are you nuts.

Love the concept of a long overdue replacement for Sandy’s, but give them to the USAF Spec Ops, not those ungrateful backstabbers.

omg air force? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

If the US give Afghan their Air Force.…we can look for them to bomb and strafe American/NATO Forces ASAP. I say hold off until we are safely the hell out of there.… look at the predicament the ground troops arr in today and the Afghans are suppose to be their protectors??? We give them guns, ammo, train them and now they are murdering Americans daily!

Why are our generals using my taxpayer money to purchase foreign aircraft for use by 8th century thugs? Can anyone explain this to me? Sounds like treason to me.

Congress and the White House are buying the aircraft. Generals don’t sign checks. The Afghan government is a regional partner (on paper anyways) and we’re buying them aircraft they’re already familiar with. Look up the definition of treason again.

Maybe we can scare up some additional funds for our good allies in Pakistan too.

hawker beechcraft is chinese owned, isn’t it? i think they went bankrupt and got bought earlier this year.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

AdChoices | Become a fan on and follow us on
© 2013 Military Advantage
A Monster Company.