Lockheed: No WARN notices in November

Lockheed: No WARN notices in November

Lockheed Martin backed off its promise to issue layoff notices days before the presidential election on Friday following a guidance letter issued by the White House and promises made by the Pentagon not to cancel defense contracts on Jan. 2.

Lockheed CEO Bob Stevens had threatened to issue layoff warnings to the his workforce in accordance with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. In light of the Pentagon’s Friday promise not to cancel or modify contracts, Lockheed issued a statement saying the company “we will not issue sequestration-related WARN notices this year.”

The WARN Act mandates that companies issue a notice to its employees at least 60 days ahead of large planned layoffs. The 60-day mark ahead of sequestration’s drop dead date of Jan. 2 would land four days before November’s presidential election. Thousands of defense workers receiving a notice of a potential layoff would obviously harm President Obama’s campaign, especially in Virginia, a major battleground state.


Robert Hale, the Pentagon’s comptroller, has said in recent public appearances the Defense Department will have a little bit of flexibility to move funds around to protect certain programs from the 9.4 percent across the board defense cuts dictated by sequestration legislation voted on by Democrats and Republicans.

Pentagon officials had feared the sequestration cuts mandate a 9.4 percent cut indiscriminate of programs. However, a sequestration report released by the Office of Management and Budget indicated the Defense Department will apply the cuts to overall budget accounts, not specific programs.

This means, if Congress fails to come to a compromise to delay or avoid sequestration, the Pentagon will have time to move money around and save certain programs from the 9.4 percent cut. Defense contracts have not avoided the budget axe, but even under the worst case scenario, Pentagon budgeteers will have have an unspecified amount of time before announcing budget cancellations and modifications.

Defense companies received further cover Friday with a guidance letter from OMB. It said the federal government will pay for severance costs mandated by the WARN Act should it be necessary because of the earlier Department of Labor guidance.  Labor officials had told defense executives that the threat of sequestration did not require companies to issue WARN notices in November.

Join the Conversation

If congress can’t comeup with a reasonable solution, perhaps they should be the happy recipient of a “Lay Off Notice!” :)

Our economy is so large, that it’s hard to comprehend. Adding up all the candy, cards, dinners, gifts, parties, etc. around Valentine’s day each year, American’s spend approx $14 billion annually on this Holiday.

Can’t our country also spend that same amount each and every year consistently for building new USN, USCG, NOAA, MSC, ships, subs, cutters, etc. ?

So Much for ANOTHER one of Obummer’s MOST TRANSPARENCY ADMISTRATION NOTICES!

It’s more important to get re-electected THAN CARE ABOUT PEOPLE! Ah– Chicago dirty politics at its best!

This is like congress barring there head in the sand and thinking some magic spell would end sequestration which will be disastrous when it hits more layoffs and plant closers now and only congress and rich CEOs can blame themselves.

Did any of you think this was going to go a different way? The universal fear of Barry is appalling. We deserve what comes our way, just like Germany and Japan.

Obama alrady said that sequestration WILL happen in January! So, how can he get around the law! Oh, yeah; it’s election year politics! Since most of the layoffs will have an effect in Virginia (a swing state). Obama does not believe in federal laws OR the constituion; so he can do what he wants. It has already been revealed that Lockheed Martin is getting taxpayer money not to send out the layoff notices! What ever happened to the oath of office?

“… flexibility to move funds around to protect certain programs from the 9.4 percent across the board defense cuts dictated by sequestration legislation voted on by Democrats and Republicans.” So, in other words, play ball and help us protect our boss, and we’ll reward you by killing the programs of those that follow established law.

Wow. Bought & paid for. Yeah; things have really changed. Makes me wanna vomit.

So Barry’s going to use our tax dollars to enable LM to break the law? And there are still people willing to vote for this corrupt SOB?

I predict shortly after the election Zero will throw LM under the bus anyway. He likely threatened them with program cancellation if they refused to play ball.

Sold Out to Obama and the pentagon, what else do you expect from Lockheed

Nothing to gain there. I suspect it was more likely Obama said, “play ball or we’ll cancel your contracts”.

But look at it from a democrat perspective: when all those cuts to budgets and jobs finalize, obama can see just how big his welfare state expands before it blows up on the POTUS 2016.
All those decent-paying middle class manufacturing sector (defense industry) jobs curtailed indefinitely will only add to the ranks of unemployment harvesters: why work for a living when a welfare-state nation pays you not to?
(…and our tax base will evaporate even further…)

But hey,…not like he’ll have any more face to lose, what with no need to care about the country once he deceives enough of us into handing him his second term, securing his POTUS pension and bnefits for the rest of his life.

And folks had a good laugh at the SNL skit with Bush’s “What is not my problem…“
Wait’ll BO sinks us to even greater lows.

This is an astonishing act by the Justice Department (not Congress) to create a special exemption for Defense companies from the ill-conceived WARN Act so that the Obama Administration and Congressional Democrats can avoid accountability for sequestration on 6 November. Just another example of the Federal Government exempting itself from business-killing regulations it imposes on the private sector at the behest of its Big Labor political constituency.

The Obama Labor Department’s generosity in covering WARN Act compliance costs should shock both taxpayers and private sector businesses who do not benefit from this blatant and outrageous favoritism.

The right answer, of course, is for a Congress of grownups to repeal the ridiculously burdensome WARN Act and pass responsible budgets that don’t rely on the dead-man switch gimmickry of sequestration. But for now, it is at least perversely satisfying to watch the Obama Democrats squirm to avoid being hoist on their own petard.

Nahh…this is the Obama Labor Department and OMB trying to worm themselves out of the electoral consequences of a law the Administration sponsored.

Can’t blame Lockheed on this…they’re between a rock and a hard place. Stevens and the AIA Defense industry execs have already made a pretty firm stand against the folly of sequestration, and they deserve credit for it. You just can’t win in business by declaring war on your only customer.

Yup they protect the contractors (most of whom are unionized) while laying off thousands of government wage grade employees, mostly all vets who obama and the dems promised and claimed to be making extra efforts and excemptions to ensure them jobs all get sent home. Now the shops are near vacant while the workload continues to increase because the contractors cant meet work loads (for repair of equipment) so they are allowed to defere it to govt depots to get it fixed at a lower cost to them than doing it themselves and then charging the govt the full amount for the repair they didnt even do.… yeah the brass is really on top of things and managing well for the tax payers.

What do contractors have to gain by not sending out notices?

They make money just by keeping people on the books for a contract wether they are working or not (chargethe govt. 50.00 an hr per man but only pay the eployee 14.00 to 20.00 average). They say it’s to cover pay, bennefits and such (of full time personnel) but they pad the work force with temps (less pay and no bennefits) to make a profit.

Again, how do contractors make money by not sending out notices? These are notices of *impending* payoffs, not pinkslips. In other words, the headcount doesn’t change whether they send them out or not. So how do companies make money by not sending them out?

Because if they dont send them out 60 days in advance — they cant lay anyone off working on a govt contract ( even if they fired someone for bad performance they have to refill that spot asap to be contractualy compliant) and we have to keep paying them, therefore it keeps getting extended out until we give them a definate date for cancelation. It’s not like working for a non contractor where they can tell you at any time they are down sizing and not to show up tomorrow.

People get laid off at the drop of a hat all the time. This will be no different. Watch. As soon as the election is over the pink slips will flow.

That is most likely true, unless Obama wins and doesnt cancel any of the contracts as promised and congress does not have the votes to overturn hi decision. Even if they do, they will still get full pay and bennefits for 60 days minimum at the tax payers expense by law.

BOOMER,

Defense industry contractors are not mostly unionized.

There are large numbers of military veterans in both the contractor and DoD civil service workforces.

In my experience, DoD agency heads tend to reduce contractor support first before reducing their civil service headcount.

Members of Congress tend not to care whether an unemployed constituent is a contractor or civil servant. Each vote counts the same in November. (Except for Democrats, who view civil servants as captive for life. In any case, I’ve certainly seen no preference for contractors over civil servants.)

Boomer, not sure where you get this. Sounds made up. The government can typically reduce scope or cancel on a contract at any time for the convenience of the government. There may be contract costs to pay, but it’s the govt’s call.

BTW, Virginia is a right-to-work state, where employment is strictly on an at-will basis, even for federal contractors. My company can legally fire anyone at any time, and any employee can quit at any time. The terms of a government contract do not affect the at-will nature of employment.

SecretSquid,
You are correct about Virginia being a “right-to-work” state. All this gets confusing because labor laws are defined or tied to the locale of the headquarters of the business/corporation. My wife was a contractor who was recently laid off, but was provided additional benefits and legal notice because the company which we thought was headquartered in Virginia had recently moved its headquarters to DC. Lesson learned.

As for all these issues, its all where you stand as to how you are impacted or feel about a policy, issue or decision made by our elected politicians.

The whole group Republicans included should be loaded into a derelict ship and aimed at the Titanic. Clean them all out.

Some are missing the point. This law addresses mass layoffs — not the normal process of layoffs that occurs in these companies. Automatic budget cuts will affect ongoing contracts and new contracts. That being said, major DoD companies will be working the system from all angles in order to maintain or grow market share within a declining and evolving market. I suspect that you may see large conglomerates divest themselves of some of their DoD business units and you will see a further consolidation of major DoD companies (much like you saw after the wall went down). For SETA type contracts there has been a major shift over the last few years towards small businesses, increased competition, and lower cost; driving the large DoD companies out of this market through set asides and OCI. FFRDC’s may be the next on the list for major reductions as the cost of a single FFRDC FTE is now equivalent to 2 or more SETA. By working the SETA/FFRDC market they can delay or postpone further cuts to the DoD government civilian workforce.

This is crazy. A guy running for re-election is urging others to break the law he has sworn to uphold.

Just another day for our Liar-in –Chief

we all know that — those weasels are truly corrupt. 9.4% ? How did they get that? Either we need the military, or we don’t. You never turn off a guard service unless you are secure. I look at the world and see we are most definitely NOT!

Thank you SS, that needed to be said. You won’t have any luck convincing Boomer that the Defense industry aren’t corrupt, evil ogres though, he’s made a blogging career trying to get people to bite on that idea. Can’t seem to understand the facts you just laid out.

SS and Alan, Lockheed was not the only contractor told not to do layoffs and VA is not the only state in question. How do I know this — because I work for the govt overseeing DoD and contractor operations, there are good and bad on both sides and I have complained about the govt way more times on here than contractors. Yeah the govt can modify contracts to reduce manhour costs to the govt if it s in the govts best intrest and the contractor can still meet requirements but this is not what we are talking about. The govt said this budget reduction is going to happen and thousands of govt Wage grade and GS personnel have been sent home as of this Oct 1 not to return, while they have told contractors not to make any cuts yet and they will continue to get paid.

@ sferrin they have nothing to gain except all of their legal bills when they are charged for breaking the law will be paid by you and me. Let’s not forget all of the lawsuits filed by each employee laid off w/o a 60 day notice they are estimating about 100,000 + workers. Keep in mind, legal expenses include settlement money as well. Defense contractors specifically under the Warren Act have to give that 60 Day notice or they will be in violation. Since it is national news thus establishing irrefutable evidence they will lose every single lawsuit or have to settle every single one. Every dime of those settlements will be public money are you comfortable with that?????

Keep your finger in the dam Barrack until November. Then everything will entirely unravel before our very eyes. You can trust the administration, go head, vote for them again. They will keep their word this time, FORWARD, Sheeple! They have already started laying off NASA workers.

<– Vet AND contractor. But, everything is not so cut and dry. In fairness, I make more money than I should for what I do. I also worked my butt of to be able to. FYSA, contractors and DOD civilians often swap back and forth between worlds depending on job availability. Nevertheless, it’s the same job pool at the same locations. Only the leadership and pay change.

The socialist pig has no idea what the Oath of office means. He wants to destroy America from with in.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

AdChoices | Become a fan on and follow us on
© 2013 Military Advantage
A Monster Company.