GOP blasts White House over WARN Act guidance

GOP blasts White House over WARN Act guidance

Republican senators have lined up to blast the White House over the guidance issued to the defense industry over sequestration and the requirement to issue layoff notices to their work forces four days before the presidential election.

Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the president has “bribed” defense companies to not send out the notices by offering to pay for any expenses incurred for not following the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act.

“Bribing companies to not send out layoff notices just days before this year’s election by promising to pay for any litigation costs that result from their failure to follow the WARN Act is both irresponsible and puts the taxpayers on the hook to pay for billions of dollars in payouts and lawyer fees,” Inhofe said.


Defense executives said the WARN Act would have mandated they issue layoff notices on Nov. 2 because of the potential of massive layoffs should sequestration occur on Jan. 2. Sequestration would trigger a $500 billion cut to planned defense spending over the next ten years and put plenty of defense contracts at risk.

The Office of Management and Budget issued a memo Friday to companies specifying that the WARN Act would not require them to issue layoff notices Nov. 2 due to sequestration. The Pentagon also confirmed that they do not plan to modify or cancel contracts on Jan. 2.

The OMB promised to pay for companies’ litigation costs should the courts rule in favor of employees because of WARN Act violations.

Lockheed Martin and other defense companies thus backed off their promises to issued the notices in November.

Republican Sens. Charles Grassley, Iowa, and Kelly Ayotte, N.H, wrote a letter to Jeffrey Zients, the acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, questioning how the White House had the authority to promise to pay court fees associated with employee layoffs caused by sequestration.

“We are concerned about the authority of the executive branch to instruct private employers not to comply with federal law and to promise to pay the monetary judgments and litigation costs that arise out of the lawsuits that may follow,” the two Senators wrote to Zients.

Grassley and Ayotte estimated the fees could cost taxpayers millions, if not billions, of dollars.

Companies have to issue layoff notices at least 60 days ahead of planned, large-scale layoffs. Sequestration will go into affect Jan. 2 unless Congress can come to a compromise. Sixty days prior to Jan. 2 is Nov. 2, four days prior to the presidential election.

Republican legislators have suggested that President Obama is focused more on skirting the rules of the WARN Act rather than working with Republicans to avoid sequestration all together. Obama’s campaign stands to lose ground if the defense contractors issued the layoff notices, especially in Virginia, a major battleground state with plenty of defense contractors.

“Rather than providing leadership to address looming sequestration cuts, Obama’s Office of Management and Budget is now offering what amounts to a bailout for the Obama presidency,” Inhofe said.

Join the Conversation

This stuff is bad enough to shame a tinhorn, pot-bellied El Presidente in some minor and remote banana republic.

For a branch of the federal government to arbitrarily decide to notify private businesses to ignore explicit federal law, and to tell those businesses that they’ll be compensated _ex post facto_ for the incidental costs of said lawlessness?

Absolutely astonishing and brazen. The Founding Fathers wept.

What is sadly not at all astonishing is that the likes of LockMart amicably agreed to that particular devil’s bargain! Anything for a buck.

If anyone working in the Defense Industry does not know about sequestration may I ask is your head buried in the sand and if you say yes then your stupid. We have heard about this for years.

This is a feable attempt by Obama to buy votes from those who work in this industry, then after the election cut us off at the knees

It’s funny how the mainstream media ignores this.

What do you expect from them they are in the TANK for Obama, everone knows that and if they donot then they are Blonde

Bunch of cry babies!

The Liberals are doing this strictly for votes. They lie.

Not a suprise. This is the kind of Chicago politics we expected after the last election. Fractionalize the electorate. Buy each fraction off so that they only think for what they get and not for the greater good. Gays get into the military, and get support for gay marriage. Immagrants get the DREAM act without congresses actions, AARP members are promised more senior benefits, Vets are pormised no raise in Tricare costs, Middle class is promised that all will be paid for by the wealthy (read businesses). Have we reached the 50% mark yet or is there another group that needs to be taken care of?

What, you mean political parties are motivated by power and businesses are motivated by profits? Now there’s a news flash! Who would have seen this coming? Let me pretend to give a damn for just a moment. Ok, carry on.

Sequestration can only happen if one side or the other intends not to come to an agreement. Don’t agree and you have a political tool to send layoff notices on election day. What happened to Compromise and Common Ground?

Is there no stopping this president from continually skirting federal laws?

He’s transparent alright, he’s out there bribing all these contractors using OUR money to help him stay in office and the media is completely ignoring it and the sheep are agreeing to it.

In that whole super committe did you notice that the Republicans want to cut spending while the DemocRATS just wanted to Raise Taxes and we all know what happens when the DemocRATS raise taxes they spend it fater than a 16 year old at the mall

Yes it is call voting him out of office

This whole blame game and personal pet projects in congress is why we will have sequestration. Not all the Presidents fault. Time for blame on those congressional dead heads too.

You over there. Back to the end of the cheese line for you.

You want to hear stupid. There are people in the defense industry cheering him on. Talk about a lack of situational awareness.

I have seen that before. During one election cycle, the main product that my company produced was categorically ooposed by one of the congressional candidates. He happened to be a Dem and the union which represented our hourly workers endorsed the candidate that wanted to do away with what we produced and even allowed him to use their union hall as his local headquarters.
After he won and the layoffs began, the union leadership was all up in arms and swearing that they had done everything they could to keep work in the factory.

That line is so lame now.

Maybe if you repubs actually practiced what you preached the rest of America would be with you. But all this whining after we squander how much on wasted weapon systems that didnt even get into production.

What about all the lies on the right. They are okay for you.

Just damn Hippocrates is what the rest of Americans see. To blind you guys on the right are blinded by self righteousness that you can’t see the Hippocracy.

Where were all you loud mouths before we were invading Iraq. That lie was all good.

You can save that isht, that whinning blah blah blah.

How about the right compromise on sequestration? I’m sorry only the left should compromise and follow the right.

Bull isht save it we are sick of it.

we have no president right now.. only candidates..happens every 4 years.. nothing new.. but candidate or president, seems there would be a jurisdiction to following the laws just like the rest of us peons have to…

Yea I love the Utah politics also.

Only 47% of the country works. Get the uck out of here.

So let’s cut taxes to 20% and remove deductions so those of us who own houses get nothing back but the rich get their big break. They have record surplus just hire already.

The right seems so blind and dumb. If you wasn’t so busy hating the president stating that is your number 1 goal over the economy then maybe this race wouldn’t look like it is.

But if you alienate people for not being rich then your chances are slim.

By the way some of us not rich people work very hard every day.

Bull isht. they just want to cut spending on social issues.

Mitt has already said he wants to increase defense spending.

So the way it seems is that this social security that I have been paying into since I have been 15 is for us all. Who the hell are the few to tell us we don’t deserve it while we waste how much on isht that doesn’t work.

I mean fcs, commanche, cursader, F-22. f-35, LCS are just a few failures.

So what are the baby boomer supposed to do not have any social security.

What are the rest of us supposed to do, let them keep raising the retirement age.

I for one don’t want to work until I am 80 so the changes that Mitt proposes to ss may not effect everyone but they for sure effect me.

And FYI Bush didn’t fund either war so you aren’t really speaking from a position of authority. The big difference between Bushes deficit and Obama’s is that at least Obama spends it in the US.

Yet you fools complain about Obama spending money on the US, should we just keep wasting money invading countries?

In both cases the outcome was less then desirable.

By the thumbs down given to you, some of us would rather burry our head in the sand and forget reality.

Some of us would rather believe a lie then even think about what is going on.

Yes.…He did nothing to help the country.

There is no helping you.

Did Clinton increase taxes to cover the war in Kosovo? By the way, we are still there!
Did Clinton increase taxes when we started dropping bombs on Saddam in 1998? He didn’t fund that either. How did Barrack fund the war that he got us into in Libya last year?

You complain about the retirement age changing but for me, full Social Security is at age 67 but was supposed to be 65 when I started working. Bush and Romney didn’t change the age.

Bush and Romney didn’t screw the military retirees out of the free healthcare for life that they were promised either.

By the way, Social Security is self funding and supposed to stand on its own with the money that it charges all of us. Because of the number of retirees in the next decades, the Social Security fund will not have enough money to pay out what it needs to. WE (the US) needs to either add money to the fund (higher Social Security deductions from pay) or cut benefits (raise the age or lower the checks). It is that simple. Add money to the fund or take less money out of the fund. Thus far, the president has refused to take action, what do YOU suggest?

391, I agree with you that this is a feeble attempt to buy votes. Coming from the folks who brought us the (2nd) Louisiana Purchase and the Cornhusker Kickback, this should not be surprising.

But Sequestration is a consequence of the Budget Control Act of 2011 and the failure of the “Supercommittee” to reach an agreement on targeted budget cuts. We have NOT “heard about this for years” (although it might seem like it’s been years). And while defense contractor employees are generally aware that programs will be cut, no one in industry (or in government) today can say WHICH PROGRAMS will be cut or which companies of plants will be affected. So no one really knows who is at risk of being RIF’ed on 3 January and who is not, which is the whole point of the (ill-conceived) Warn Act.

I take it by your response that you already got yours. Shovel-ready job, I mean.

Oh get over yourself — there is no layoff planned. Not even the Republican controlled House is going to let sequestration go into effect, even though their intention was to use it to make companies lay off employees just before the election.…

Let’s see. Republicans want to cut taxes. Democrats want to raise them. Seems to me the compromise position is where the Republicans stand today: don’t raise taxes.

If he gets in again; this country will be in the same boat as Greece! Might as well throw the constitution away! Right after the socilist marxist takes his OATH OF OFFICE!

These companies are crying wolf over sequestration on Jan 2. There will be no layoffs required for months after the new year starts. LH was going to send them out to all employees just to make a point. The Defense department has no plan to cut anything so how could the contractors. The money will never be a across the board percentage on every check written everyday of the year. Even if they take the 50 billion for the year it will be out by the end of the year not day one like all the doom and gloomers talk about. I bet if we added 50 B to the budget we wouldnt see the 100 of thousands of job added by those same contractors. they would just make more money and still not give us a good product

Am disappointed to see politics at this site.

Let’s protect those that serve and make sure their patriotism is not hijacked…again.

The GOP has no shame. They have obstructed every single chance, filibustered more than every other CONgress combined, to thwart any semblence of recovery just to ensure President Obama was a “1-term President.” Then when things don’t change fast enough, the GOP sits back and casts complete blame at Obama. Pretty conveinent that the GOP offers themselves immunity for the state of this country when they have been right at the front, destroying this country.

ROFL!!!! I’m sorry, who had FULL control from 2008 to 2010? Who is still racking up trillion+ deficits every year? Who promised that if we just let him spend $900 billion that unemployment would never hit 8%? On who’s watch has unemployment been OVER 8% for 43 MONTHS and counting? You need to put down the Kool-Aid sunshine.

Was this supposed to be in response to Torquewrench? If so…Fail. Not a single point that he brought up was addressed. So here, let me help you try to stay on topic: 1) Under what authority does the OMB promise to pay the litigation costs for private companies if they ignore current law? 2) Where does the OMB intend to get this money? 3) Under what authority are taxpayer monies to be used to pay people to knowingly circumvent the law? Under what authority does the current administration arbitrarily decide which laws it wishes to inforce, and which laws it wishes to obstruct? The same disregard for law has been repeatedly shown by this administration, from illegal immigration laws that are slectively (not) applied, to Black Panther voter intimidation cases that get dropped for no valid reason, to, well, let’s just say the list would be pretty long.

I think you kind of missed the point. Allow me to summarize: Chicago politics — fractionalize the electorate — make promises to each fraction — depend on the self-serving nature of the electorate to bite on said promises — deliver on promises if possible by granting special privileges to supporting fractions — depend on fractionalized nature of selective government favoritism to create increased fractional resentment (class warfare, racism, etc.) thereby further fractionalizes the electorate.…Repeat.

Cycle not repeating fast enough? Throw more fuel on the fire. Claim to be unifying, but phrase everything in divisive terms. Always make it Us vs Them. Rich vs Poor. White vs Black. Dem vs Rep. Blue collar vs White collar. Old vs Young. Religious vs Irreligious. And remember, if anybody fitting one of the THEM categories criticizes your policies, it is clearly not a legitimate criticism. No, it is simply because they are THEM (pick whichever THEM category fits best at the critic best).

Oh, wait a minute, why am I explaining this to you? I see that you have already caught on to the game. Instead of simply stating your opinion, and letting that stand on its merits, you categorized yourself for us! Thanks so much! Now that we know that you are “not rich”, you are clearly in the “us” category, and your opinion means so much more!!!

I serve, and I fully expect my patriotism to be hijacked, again and again and again. After all, who do I serve? Yes, the US citizens. But we all (military) answer to the Cheif Executive Officer — the Pres. I will faithfully serve whatever president we have, but that does not mean that I (we) should be disinterested in politics. Why would you expect not to see politics here? After all, who pays a higher price for the president’s decisions than those in the military?

Yah, you go ahead and keep swallowing what’s being shoved down your throat. Talk about drinking the fox kool-aid! You do realize Obama never had the clear supermajority, since Repubs refused to seat Franken, Lieberman was reliably Republican, and Teddy died within days of Franken being seated. and a simple majority is no longer adequate to get any legislation passed. You are aware of the GOP’s record number of filibuster’s, correct? Are you also aware of the spending record under Bush and how many times the debt ceiling was raised without any worries? What about all the jobs Boehner promised us with tax cuts?Do you remember, “Deficits don’t matter?” I guess the caveat for that was as long as the President is a Republican. But I guess according to you, all the crap that’s been done to this country should have been fixed during 2008–2010, while the GOP sits on the sidelines. But you did get one thing right sunshine, you are sorry.

The Dems never had a supermajority? Explain again how we ended up Obamacare. As for deficits, the trend was they were shrinking up until ’06, then the started increasing again in ’07 and went into overdrive in ’08. Yeah, that lines up just right with the Dems taking control of Congress in ’06 and getting a year for the effects to be felt. And we all know how Barry’s been on deficits don’t we? You must be drinking the Kool-Aid with a fire hose.

That’s because you obviously don’t know what compromise is.

“your stupid”? Perhaps “you’re stupid”?
*Irony detector melts*
SecDef should be impeached promptly for advising defense contractors to violate law.

Hippocrates? The greek physician? Like in the Hippocratic oath? Sounds like a good thing to me. Why are you damning him? He had nothing to do with the gulf wars…

Hippocracy? Is that like a aristocracy composed of Hippos? Seems like a good thing, rather then one full of blustering politicans…

We should have constituional admendment. Change the presidential term to 6 years, no re-election allowed.

As it is, we get no work out of the bums.
1st year figuring out why their naive idealistic agenda isn’t going to work
2nd year spent fighting with congree to figure out how to make things work.
6 months actually working (with time off for golf)
1.5 years compaigning for re-election.

No wonder this government doesn’t get anything done.

What r u kidding me with an answer like that! We should vote someone in that does this! U r as crazy as he is!

That is why we all must volunteer our time and money plus talk to everyone we know to vote him out!

How can you think it is congress fault? No it is called the presidents fault! He is bribing companies to not send out layoff notices just days before this year’s election by promising to pay for any litigation costs that result from their failure to follow the WARN Act.
He went to Vegas campaigning for donations when 4 American’s were murdered and tries to cover that up to, he has cut our military spending by 500 billion dollars and yet loans 90 billion to companies that went bankrupt but gave him back 30 million in contributions. He has had our credit downgraded and put us in a 16 trillion dollar deficit and by the end by early next year it will be 17 trillion.
Let’s not forget the law we use to be, if you collect welfare you had to work for it but Obama took that law away he will just give it to you. Now if America has such a bad deficit you would think he would not have changed that law. HOW CAN ANYONE POSSIBLY TRUST HIM?

The GOP is destroying this country?

You are, one very sick, Communist Puppy.

Good riddance to Obama in November 2012.

My only regret is my company does not hold the fumigation contract for the White House when Obama leaves.

That would be because in this ever so modern and enlightened age, the media…be it print, video, or radio…they are all controlled either directly or indirectly by the government. This has been coming into effect since before Obama and would seem that there is little chance of stopping it now. So, no, they won’t be running much press on something that could hurt his chances at re-election, unless its from a venue that is owned/operated by someone who supports someone other than Obama. And even then, we’ll be lucky to even hear of it.

Who lied? Who is a liar every single day of his presidency? Who has skirted the senate more than 100 times? Who??? The liberals and this president. You think it is ok to buy votes? You think it is ok to buy the unions? You think it is ok to destroy capitalism? YOU are the idiot Greg — YOU!!!

Hahahahahahahahahaha!

Controlled by the government!? Oh, man, I haven’t laughed that hard in months. Thanks.

POWER AND GREED, THIS WHY THEY ARE PRESIDENTS. MONEY COUNTS!

Still got your head in the sand, eh? Or is yours just a conditioned pro-Obama reflex?

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

AdChoices | Become a fan on and follow us on
© 2013 Military Advantage
A Monster Company.