Pentagon starts to open network to iPhones, Androids

Pentagon starts to open network to iPhones, Androids

The Defense Department has finally started the process of opening its network to iPhone and Android smartphones after relegating service members and contractors to use BlackBerrys, according to a Bloomberg report.

BlackBerrys have gone the way of the cassette tape and the VHS. Washington D.C. is one of the few remaining bastions where people still carry BlackBerrys as Reseach in Motion, maker of the BlackBerry, has used their government contracts to stay afloat even as their market share plummets.

The Pentagon is one of the worst offenders. Halls are packed with service members and contractors that carry their BlackBerry in one pocket and their personal smartphone — either an iPhone or an Android — in the other. Some even carry two on their belt.


Defense Department officials have started work on securing over 160,000 Apple and Google Andriod mobile systems to include iPhones, iPads and a litany of Android smartphones. Engineers intend to eventually expand that number to over 8 million.

This does not mean service members and contracts would have to stop using BlackBerrys, but they would soon have a choice. If the private market is any indication, government and military individuals will be choosing Apple and Android products in droves.

Army and other service leaders have made their intentions know that they want to expand the use of smartphones even further. Army generals have declared that they want to eventually issue smartphones to every soldier so they can use it for training and combat purposes.

In line with those plans, expanding the choices of what smart phones they can use makes sense, if not over due.

Join the Conversation

I don’t think they are any concrete needs to get their phone network compatible with everything, unless they plan to have a better control of security on all contractors phone. If I was the DoD I would pounds all alternatives and took the single most suited phones for their needs; I believe that by choosing three variants they multiply the risk by more than three, although they are a lot of goods reason for not relying exclusively on blackberry. While they are still considered to be the #1 in security, in the future they might take some shortcut or simply not have the required resources to maintain a stable, secure and convenient platform.

Blackberry was the most convenient and efficient phone in 2006, and the only one that took care of security. But they failed to adapt to new technologies, when a 180$ sony ericsson not-a-smartphone implement 3g connectivity along with more powerful processor than a 400+$ blackberry. It took them 3–4 years before getting touchscreen properly implemented (i.e. touchscreen + bbm keyboard + optical trackpad) as their latest models do. With everyone jumping out of the bbm boat, and that mean apps that sucks. I mean just for a calculator, a more adapted clock, etc..

They are so many security and confidentiality problems that I am scared. Making sure that nothing can escape is going to be a nightmare when the manufacturer doesn’t put their needs in the first plan. Ex: Some or all of Apple voice recognition work in the cloud, someone having access to that system –either a cyber attack or the good old corruption– could know where and when meeting take place, thanks to the very convenient voice recognition from your lovely iphone.

These network has to put security and confidentiality at the expense as not being as convenient as what the market has to offer. More than the 3/4 of the security hole in the internet come from “cool” feature like flash that are a delight for hacker. Yet instead of correcting those flaw they put a new layer of “more cool”, even more insecure. That exactly the kind of model to avoid here!

In the second paragraph, second phrase was incomplete:

.…But they failed to adapt to new technologies; when a 180$ sony ericsson not-a-smartphone implement 3g connectivity before a 400+$ blackberry along with a more powerful processor, something is really wrong.

Letting people bring in outside phones might not be a smart idea. All it takes is slipping the wrong app through the App Store or Google Play and some guy installing it, then bringing it into the DoD network.

If what is needed is some kind of smartphone-type platform, why not just use iPhone touches issued by the DoD that can connect through a VPN if necessary, and ideally shouldn’t be able to install apps from the public Apple App Store? (and since Apple prods are “protected” from installing random apps on the web unless jailbroken…)

All in all, if the DoD had to chose a single phone it should be android based. Because it’s open source, they can strip ip, embed secure function and recompile everything with more secure libraries, and know exactly what is going on. Google play store? Gone. Apps pre-installed that consume bandwidth without you know about? Gone. No need to root your phone to install a firewall to block that crap as it doesn’t exist anymore.

Total control.

By going android, they could design their own SoC, fabbed in USA. By implementing thing like a hardware hypervisor, specifically designed to contain cyber attack and avoid data breaches, they will have a much, much more secure platform than blackberry will never have.

ICE clearly don’t get it. They picked the iphone…
http://​www​.networkworld​.com/​c​o​m​m​u​n​i​t​y​/​n​o​d​e​/​8​1​670

Military iPhones! What could go wrong?

Hey, Siri, I’m in lower Manhattan and I’ve heard a lot about Hurricane Sandy coming here. Should I be worried?

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/files/2012/10/Screen-shot-2012–10-29-at-14.55.24.png

The reality is that Apple build fragile and glossy yuppie fashion accessories, not militarily useful computing devices.

Have the Panasonic Toughbook engineering team build ruggedized smartphone hardware, and then put an NSA hardened build of the Android kernel on top of that. Then lock that sucker down tight. No user installed apps!

Because they thought the App Store made it a better buy.

So…everyone in the TSA will play Angry Birds, Angry Birds: Space…?

Some of you act like DoD is the only player that needs a secure, reliable smartphone. There are plenty of users throughout the world who have these same requirements and use these devices every day. DoD needs to stop acting like they have special needs and get with the program. We stopped driving the technology bus a long time ago.

Some of the comments about iphones not being rugged enough for field use are a little narrow minded. For every combat arms solider, there are 10 support soldiers. So there are a lot of phones in the rear with the gear. Incidentally, there are cases of units using idevices on aircraft AND there are aftermarket cases for the iPhone that are certainly hard-core rugged.

I’d me more worried about securing the iPhone for OPSEC than shock damage.

I’m also sure DOD and NSA force Apple to basically give them the equivalent of a Jail-Broken phone.

Marky
Tacticaltshirts​.com

The application of each soldier or Marine having the ability to be in direct contact is step forward in battlefield tactics . I think this may be a step in eliminating friendly fire deaths.

This is really good read for me, i enjoyed your informative article. Thanks for giving nice info. i am very happy to read this article. I appreciate it, thanks for sharing.

This is really good read for me, i enjoyed your informative article. Thanks for giving nice info. i am very happy to read this article. I appreciate it, thanks for sharing.

I enjoy a well-written article like many other online readers. I was surprised that this information was so interesting. You have given me cause to reflect on many aspects of your content. I like that. http://​www​.ktechsol​.com/​w​e​b​-​h​o​s​t​ing

Its really good to know that Pentagon has finally started opening their network for smartphones.

Its really good news, people can’t think of living without smartphones and Pentagon has finally started opening their network for smartphones.

I am really impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare to see a great blog like this one nowadays. Ktechsol

Hi

thanks for sharing this info.…..!
http://www.myprintsupplier.com/products#!/~/categ

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

AdChoices | Become a fan on and follow us on
© 2013 Military Advantage
A Monster Company.