Raytheon Sells Stingers for Apaches Abroad

Raytheon Sells Stingers for Apaches Abroad

Raytheon Co., the world’s largest missile maker, is boosting sales of its popular Stinger missile for AH-64 Apache attack helicopters around the world, company officials said.

The Waltham, Mass.-based company has already sold the helicopter-launched Stingers to Japan and Taiwan, recently inked a similar deal with South Korea and expects to finalize agreements in coming months with India and Qatar, according to Mark Nicol, director of Raytheon’s Stinger missile program.

“It gives them that air-to-air capability,” he said during an interview at the Association of the United States Army conference this week in Washington, D.C. “It can go against small aircraft, other helicopters, UASs,” he said, referring to unmanned aerial systems, commonly known as drones.

The FIM-92 Stinger entered U.S. military service in the early 1980s as a shoulder-fired, heat-seeking missile for ground troops. Its use by rebels during the Soviet War in Afghanistan to destroy Soviet choppers was popularized in the 2007 movie, “Charlie Wilson’s War.” The missile was later configured to fire from vehicles such as Humvees and helicopters.

“It’s such a capable, little missile,” Nicol said.

The lightweight, short-range weapon has already been adapted to launch from American-made helicopters such as the AH-64 Apache, UH-60 Black Hawk and OH-54 Kiowa, according to Gordon Bourgeois, manager of international business development for Raytheon’s Missile Systems unit.

But because the U.S. military relies on other aircraft to control the skies, it generally arms rotorcraft with heavier missiles designed to take out ground targets, such as the BGM-71 Tube-launched, Optically-tracked, Wire-guided, or TOW, anti-tank missile, Hellfire missile or Talon laser-guided rocket, Bourgeois said.

Foreign militaries don’t usually operate with such a level of air superiority and thus have a greater interest in integrating Stingers on Apaches, Bourgeois said. Each Apache can be outfitted with one or two pair of Stingers with missile packs on either wingtip, he said.

“The lethality and effectiveness and precision of Stinger is internationally renown,” he said.

Raytheon, which anticipates additional business for helicopter-launched Stingers in the Middle East and Southwest Asia, is also benefiting from marketing efforts by Boeing Co., the officials said. The Chicago-based company that manufactures the Apache has been extremely successful in selling the aircraft overseas, they said.

Tags: , , , , ,

Join the Conversation

Boeing’s inexpensive little AH-6S light attack/recon helo can also be armed with Stingers, Hellfire, Hydra-70 pods, etc. Not sure what the similar AH-6i international variant can use.

They should be standard on US Apaches as well

Because a US helicopter was attacked by an enemy fighter when? The Apache should have the capability, but standard armament? No.….total waste. AH-64s support the ground troops.….…they have a BOW (basic operating weight) and a MTOGW (max takeoff gross weight) based on mostly environmental factors (temp, density altitude, etc) The more stuff you hang on the A/C that doesn’t directly support the ground troops, the less you can hang on the A/C the stuff that does. Besides, any fighter with an AAMRAM or similar capability will schwack an AH-64 from many miles beyond a Stingers range. The author is right.…stingers on FMS AH-64s without air superiority capability makes sense.….US Army Apaches.……only when required and that time hasn’t been defined.

Qatar? Aren’t they arming al-Qaeda in Syria?

The Apache always has the gun in the nose for air to air if needed. There is almost always air support for any ground offensive under the combined arms doctrine.

Can you put a sidewinder on a helicopter? Might make more sense if you were really worried about aircraft attacking your helicopter…otherwise, dead weight.

Unless we are thinking helicopter v helicopter, which would fit the Stinger’s mission profile. But couldn’t you use an ATGM against a helicopter?

Not new we used FIM-92s on AH-64s since the late 80s. Why not allies?

USMC AH-1s can carry sidewinders but obviously potentially operate in a different environment than a AH-64.

What can you say, the Raytheon lobbyist did their job well selling unnecessary arms for a non-existant need.

So Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and these other customers don’t have any reason for their attack helos to have such a capability? Are China and North Korea not going to deploy helicopters and aircraft or something?


NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

AdChoices | Like us on , follow us on and join us on Google+
© 2015 Military Advantage
A Monster Company.