Pentagon Expect Rapid Fielding to Survive After Troops Return from War

Pentagon Expect Rapid Fielding to Survive After Troops Return from War

The massive drawdown underway in Afghanistan and the current instability of the budget situation for DoD has led many to anticipate agencies and organizations stood up to react to war needs will go away once 2014 ends.

However, officials in at least one of those agencies — the Rapid Fielding Office — said that is not the case. While some of the organizations may morph into various parts of DoD and change shape or structure , the Pentagon’s Rapid Fielding office will expand its mission.

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Rapid Fielding Earl Wyatt said his office plans to expand beyond its “warzone” footing which uses operational prototyping to deliver needed technologies in less than 3 years as well as explore longer-term developmental prototyping projects.  Wyatt said the office will continue to push warzone procurement efforts with troops still in Afghanistan.

Wyatt sat down for an interview with Military​.com to discuss the new missions. Read the entire story here.

Wyatt’s office recently approved a list of 13 Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations, or JCTD, meant to explore the realm of the possible with regard to emerging technologies and harvest the best of what might be available. The list offere a window into areas of developmental priority as the DoD re-balances to the Pacific theater and prepares to face more technologically adept adversaries.

For instance, the JTCD prioritize technologies geared toward assessing and navigating through the electro-magnetic spectrum. There also continues to be much discussion about the potential future jamming environment and the importance of operating in what Pentagon officials describe as a more challenged or contested environment, Wyatt explained. Other priorities include exploration of next-generation IT, computer or server technologies designed to reduce the amount of hardware needed.

The so-called “zero-client” approach is designed to allow a single work station to access multiple domains, said Robin Hicks, who directs the JCTD effort for the Pentagon.

The Pentagon’s budget for rapid fielding and JCTDs is going up in terms of requested amounts.  Wyatt’s office received $255 million in 2013 and has requested $328 million for fiscal year 2014, according to Pentagon officials. The increased request contains more funds for JCTDs as well.

Communications technologies also figure prominently in the list of JCTDs, as the Pentagon is looking to find new ways to establish and secure cellular networks. In fact, one of the JCTDs is geared toward using UAS as nodes to facilitate communication in a tactical cellular network.

Speaking of UAS, launching small Micro-UAS from submarines is a key project being worked on by Wyatt’s office and the Navy.

Tags: , ,

Join the Conversation

This is sort of like Napoleon in the retreat from Moscow sitting down and discussing a new souffle with his chiefs.

It’s what happens when we go from a war time footing to peace. But don’t worry, you can bet the war business lobbyists are working hard to find a new war ro milk.

Anything to bypass DOD 5000.02, I guess. Anybody ever thought about trying to make the system work, and rewarding program managers for so doing ? Is that such a zany idea ?

What a boondoggle! This office appears to be all thrust and no vector. They are investing in areas that DARPA is working, doing fundamental technolgoy research that the labs should be doing, and building equipment that the PEOs should be building. This is just another pile of money out there with no real goal that contractors can go out and lobby the DoD to spend. Why not just stand this down after the war and roll this back into the normal procument chain and prioritization fromt he budget standpoint.?

An apt metaphor, well said.

‘…expand beyond its “warzone” footing…uses operational prototyping…needed technologies…explore longer-term developmental prototyping projects.” These are curious and if not suspicious words to describe what we used to say, “Lessons learned”. As a professional retiree I’m qualified to armchair the events of the past 10 years and as a result my observation my confidence in the wisdom and warfighter prowess of our senior commanders has sharply declined, in effect these guys have demonstrated little ‘brains, brawn, and balls’.

Worked on streamlining the process at HQMC back in 94–96 during the Marine Corps Continuous Process Improvement work we were doing…it was a cluster then and always will be. Did a flow chart on the procurement of the MV-22…then BGen Magnus had initiated the program when he was a Major on the CH-46 APW desk…that was 20yrs in the making at that stage and we had just received approval to start LROP. Programs on cutting edge technology don’t just fall from the tree and if the technology is demonstrated by visionary industry R&D you are ahead in the race otherwise is has to come off a drawing board and has to get and maintain Service, DoD, Administration and Congressional approval throughout the life of the budgeting process.…that’s a lot of agendas to manage. Any one of those actor’s regularly delay if not kill the progress.

In wartime procurement everyone reverts to can-do and programs can get accelerated but don’t expect that to continue during drawdown and serious budget constraints.


NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

AdChoices | Like us on , follow us on and join us on Google+
© 2015 Military Advantage
A Monster Company.