<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>DoD Buzz &#187; Air</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/category/air-warfare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Marines Laud JSF Vertical Landing</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/18/marines-laud-jsf-vertical-landing/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/18/marines-laud-jsf-vertical-landing/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:37:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[F-35B]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category> <category><![CDATA[STOVL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Trautman]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13795</guid> <description><![CDATA[Well, no one can say the Lockheed JSF team hasn't had a good week. First came, the hover and short takeoff and short landing. Today, they capped it with the plane's first true vertical landing. The Marines were officially happy. "Having the F-35B perform its first vertical landing underscores the reality of the Marine Corps achieving its goal of an all STOVL force," said Lt. Gen. George Trautman, deputy commandant for aviation.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/18/marines-laud-jsf-vertical-landing/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Data Dump For YouTube Troopers</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/18/data-dump-for-youtube-troopers/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/18/data-dump-for-youtube-troopers/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:12:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Greg Grant</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Constant Hawk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gorgon Stare]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Valiant Angel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[WAS aircraft]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13765</guid> <description><![CDATA[Joint Forces Command will soon begin shipping its Valiant Angel technology package to Afghanistan to help troops collect and sort through the massive terabytes of digital imagery collected daily by aerial drones. Bundling off the shelf technology used by the commercial video industry, the hardware and software package promises to allow troops at remote combat outposts with slow dial up to access crucial imagery. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/18/data-dump-for-youtube-troopers/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>JSF Nails STOVL and Hovers</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/17/jsf-nails-stovl-and-hovers/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/17/jsf-nails-stovl-and-hovers/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:01:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13778</guid> <description><![CDATA[<strong><em>UPDATED: Hill Aide Says LockMar Has "long way to go to demonstrate max load bring back vertical landing." </em></strong> In a move that couldn’t be much better timed, the F-35B successfully executed a short take off and a landing, as well as a hover. Lockheed Martin said the tests "confirmed predictions of the jet’s vertical thrust, stability and control in hovering flight."  ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/17/jsf-nails-stovl-and-hovers/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>10</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>More F-16s Little Help To Taiwan</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/17/more-f-16s-little-help-to-taiwan/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/17/more-f-16s-little-help-to-taiwan/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:45:56 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Greg Grant</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13756</guid> <description><![CDATA[Last week, Taiwan stepped up pressure on the Obama administration to sell it new, upgraded F-16s, something this administration, like the Bush administration before it, refuses to do. The latest Taiwanese move came from its defense ministry, which released a report saying that China’s continued modernization of its fighter fleet has shifted the cross-strait military balance decidedly in China’s favor. But a RAND report finds the addition of a few dozen upgraded F-16s would have little to no impact on the cross-strait balance. In fact, RAND found that in the event of a Chinese attack, “the air war for Taiwan could essentially be over before much of the Blue air force has even fired a shot.”
]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/17/more-f-16s-little-help-to-taiwan/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>27</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Pressure Builds for More Hornets; Multi-Year OK Likely</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/17/pressure-builds-for-more-hornets-multi-year-ok-likely/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/17/pressure-builds-for-more-hornets-multi-year-ok-likely/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:17:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13734</guid> <description><![CDATA[Congressional pressure on the Pentagon to buy more F/A-18 E/Fs and use multi-year authority continues to build, with Sen. Kit Bond being the latest to leap on the bandwagon at today's Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee hearing.Bond sent a St. Patrick's Day letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates urging use of the multi-year authority. Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said the Navy believes Boeing's February proposal for a multi-year deal meets the "threshold" for a minimum 10 percent savings. A decision should be forthcoming in a few weeks,  "sometime in April," he said. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/17/pressure-builds-for-more-hornets-multi-year-ok-likely/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>23</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>EADS Tanker Rises Again?</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/12/eads-tanker-rises-again/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/12/eads-tanker-rises-again/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:01:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13686</guid> <description><![CDATA[The tanker competition has grown so baroque that it's easy to sometimes wonder what's real and what's delusion. The latest twist is that EADS and some of Europe's governments are reportedly lobbying for a deadline extension on when tanker bids can be submitted. Boeing's brethren on Capitol Hill, sensing a possible threat to $35 billion for the company that means so much to their states,  swung into action with little delay. Sen.  Sam Brownback of Kansas said any, "Delay is unacceptable."]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/12/eads-tanker-rises-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>39</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Tanker’s First Big Test For ATL</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/12/tankers-the-test-for-atl/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/12/tankers-the-test-for-atl/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:04:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Robbin Laird</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13608</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Obama Pentagon proclaims it's commitment to reformed acquisition and greater competition. Robbin Laird, international defense consultant who advised the Air Force on the last tanker competition, argues in this commentary that Northrop's decision to pull out of the KC-X competition will pose a basic test of the administration's commitment and it's ability to oversee a major program.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/12/tankers-the-test-for-atl/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>11</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>JSF Costs Rocket 50 Percent</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/11/jsf-costs-rocket-50-percent/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/11/jsf-costs-rocket-50-percent/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:14:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13634</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Pentagon will tell Congress that the Joint Strike Fighter is roughly 50 percent more expensive than it was in 2002 and will breach the Nunn-McCurdy cost limits "in a few days," Pentagon acquisition czar Ash Carter told the Senate Armed Services Committee. Carter told the committee the cost increases were "unacceptable." The Pentagon has "to wrestle this back into some realistic box." Unit costs will climb from $50.2 million to as much as $95 million a copy, Christine Fox, director for Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, said in her testimony.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/11/jsf-costs-rocket-50-percent/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>55</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>JSF Faces Fire Risk: Head Tester</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/11/jsf-faces-fire-risk-head-tester/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/11/jsf-faces-fire-risk-head-tester/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13623</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Pentagon’s head of operational testing and evaluation is "concerned" that a recent decision to remove fuses and fire extinguishers from the Joint Strike Fighter program means more planes may be lost to enemy fire and may increase the risk from fires resulting from fuel leaks and related risks. Michael Gilmore said in written testimony prepared for the Senate Armed Services Committee that the program recent removal of "shutoff fuses for engine fueldraulics lines, coupled with the prior removal of dry bay fire extinguishers, has increased the likelihood of aircraft combat losses from ballistic threat induced fires. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/11/jsf-faces-fire-risk-head-tester/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>13</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>China Drives AirSea Battle</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/10/china-drives-airsea-battle/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/10/china-drives-airsea-battle/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:31:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Greg Grant</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13613</guid> <description><![CDATA[The 2010 QDR directed the Air Force and Navy to jointly develop the concept to “guide the development of future capabilities needed for effective power projection operations.” Andrew Krepinevich, president of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, has been thinking through just such a concept for the last two decades and has a new paper out titled “Why AirSea Battle?” that lays out the case for why its needed. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/10/china-drives-airsea-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>45</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>McCain Says Single Tanker Bid OK</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/10/mccain-says-single-tanker-bid-ok/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/10/mccain-says-single-tanker-bid-ok/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:59:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13597</guid> <description><![CDATA[<strong>UPDATED: Sarkozy To Press Obama On Tanker</strong> Today's headline in The Hill tells the story: "McCain Endorses Pentagon Process On Tanker Bid As Legitimate." My colleague Roxana Tiron asked McCain for his views and the story says he told her that he "was not worried about Boeing, the only competitor left for the contract." Meanwhile, EU officials warned against American protectionism in the wake of Northrop's decision to pull out of the $35 billion deal.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/10/mccain-says-single-tanker-bid-ok/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>54</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SASC Should Drill Carter On JSF</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/09/sasc-should-drill-carter-on-jsf/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/09/sasc-should-drill-carter-on-jsf/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:01:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Winslow Wheeler</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13556</guid> <description><![CDATA[Veteran Senate defense budget expert and analyst at the Center for Defense Information, Winslow Wheeler, penned the following commentary about the Senate Armed Service Committee's Thursday hearing on the F-35. He wants to know why the Joint Estimating Team has not been invited to testify and how Pentagon acquisition czar Ash Carter can believe the JSF faces no fundamental problems, among other things.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/09/sasc-should-drill-carter-on-jsf/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>20</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Northrop Drops Tanker Bid</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/08/northrop-drops-tanker-bid/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/08/northrop-drops-tanker-bid/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:09:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13540</guid> <description><![CDATA[<strong>UPDATED: DepSecDef Lynn Says U.S. 'Disappointed' By NG Decision</strong> More than eight years since Boeing first tried to supply new airborne tankers to the Defense Department, the company appears to have finally won the tanker competition. Northrop Grumman announced today that it will not bid on the KC-X tanker and it will not file a protest that might delay the program any further The announcement came from the top. "We reached this conclusion based on the structure of the source selection methodology defined in the RFP, which clearly favors Boeing’s smaller refueling tanker and does not provide adequate value recognition of the added capability of a larger tanker, precluding us from any competitive opportunity," said CEO Wes Bush.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/08/northrop-drops-tanker-bid/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>52</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Carter Reassures, SASC Sets F-35 Hearings</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/04/carter-reassures-sasc-sets-f-35-hearings/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/04/carter-reassures-sasc-sets-f-35-hearings/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:11:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13475</guid> <description><![CDATA[Sen. John McCain is worried about the F-35 and thinks the Defense Department has done a pretty lousy job of telling Congress about the program's woes. "As a strong supporter of the F-35, as a person who supported cancellation of the F-22, I'm very disturbed" about how the Pentagon kept the Congress informed. He said at today's Air Force posture hearing that the SASC has not "been adequately informed of the extent of what the difficulties are."]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/04/carter-reassures-sasc-sets-f-35-hearings/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>20</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Ta Da! Boeing Unveils Its KC-X</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/04/ta-da-boeing-unveils-its-kc-x/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/04/ta-da-boeing-unveils-its-kc-x/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:59:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13465</guid> <description><![CDATA[Boeing unveiled the plane it will offer for the KC-X airborne tanker competition today, <a
href="http://unitedstatestanker.com/splash/launch">including a little movie</a> and a press release. There was no mention of a 777 tanker, just the long-expected 767. One of the more intriguing adds to the new bid was the news that the new tanker will boast "a digital flight deck featuring electronic displays" taken from the 787, Boeing's most advanced civilian plane. It will  "show all flight attitude, navigation, engine indication and crew-alerting information on screens 75 percent larger than on a commercial Airbus A330." One can almost hear the Boeing folks crying: Take that EADS!]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/04/ta-da-boeing-unveils-its-kc-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>42</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>JSF Buy Shrinks If Costs Grow</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/03/jsf-buy-shrinks-if-costs-grow/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/03/jsf-buy-shrinks-if-costs-grow/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13442</guid> <description><![CDATA[No one at the Pentagon has been willing to say the Joint Strike Fighter buy might get smaller until now. But Robert Hale, the comptroller and thus the main money man, made it explicit today. "If there is cost growth, I think we will just have to reduce the buy," he said at the annual Precision Strike Association conference.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/03/jsf-buy-shrinks-if-costs-grow/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>31</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Bomber, Spy Plane, UAV</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/03/bomber-spy-plane-uav/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/03/bomber-spy-plane-uav/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:27:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13352</guid> <description><![CDATA[It could be a long range strike platform. It could use SAR and electro-optical sensors to spy on an enemy. About the only thing it won't do is serve as an attack fighter. It is Boeing's Phantom Ray, an unmanned aerial system being developed by the company's Phantom Works. The company will roll out the new plane in May. It should taxi in July. Then it will move to NASA's Dryden site for flight and other tests, which should begin in December.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/03/bomber-spy-plane-uav/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>16</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Few JSF Changes After Nunn-McCurdy</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/02/few-jsf-changes-after-nunn-mccurdy/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/02/few-jsf-changes-after-nunn-mccurdy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:37:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13390</guid> <description><![CDATA[Air Force Secretary Mike Donley confirmed the Joint Strike Fighter program will breach the Nunn-McCurdy cost growth limits but Congress should expect few changes after the mandated review occurs. Donley told defense reporters that the Pentagon has already made many of the changes that are needed.“We’ve been taking all the mitigating and corrective actions we would take as if there were a Nunn-McCurdy breach,” he said. How big the breach will be and when it will be reported to Congress, he isn't sure.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/02/few-jsf-changes-after-nunn-mccurdy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>11</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Carter Orders JSF Changes</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/01/carter-orders-jsf-changes/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/01/carter-orders-jsf-changes/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:21:28 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13361</guid> <description><![CDATA[<strong>UPDATED: Congressional AIde Says F-35 Still A "Pig;" Lockheed Defends Program </strong> In his most significant action since the Senate confirmed him, Ash Carter<a
href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Carter-F-35-REstructure-Memo.pdf"> has issued an acquisition decision memorandum</a> moving full rate production to November 2015, to withhold $614 million from Lockheed Martin and only pay it "to reward measurable progress..." Carter’s revised plan drew a stinging critique and call for a production freeze from Winslow Wheeler, a former congressional budget expert now with the Center for Defense Information.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/01/carter-orders-jsf-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>42</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Skelton Disses Gates’ F136 Study</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/02/25/skelton-disses-gates-f136-study/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/02/25/skelton-disses-gates-f136-study/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:38:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=13323</guid> <description><![CDATA[The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee called Defense Secretary Robert Gates' principal arguments against the F136 "short-sighted" and largely dismissed them. "The Department’s analysis does not consider the risk that a single engine would present not only to our fighter force, but to our national security, given that the F-35 will account for 95 percent of our nation’s fighter fleet. With this program, as with all others, we cannot use near-sighted vision when long-term security is at stake." ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/02/25/skelton-disses-gates-f136-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>30</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 17/27 queries in 0.016 seconds using apc

Served from: cloud-milcom-web1.hspheredns.com @ 2010-03-19 00:36:55 -->