<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>DoD Buzz &#187; Cyber Security</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/category/cyber-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>US, China earn low cyber defense ranking</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/31/us-china-earn-low-cyber-defense-ranking/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/31/us-china-earn-low-cyber-defense-ranking/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:25:09 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Michael Hoffman</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25663</guid> <description><![CDATA[Sweeden, Finland and Israel each field stronger cyber defense networks than U.S. and China in recent report.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/31/us-china-earn-low-cyber-defense-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>CSBA: Our weapons mix is ‘out of whack’</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/csba-our-weapons-mix-is-out-of-whack/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/csba-our-weapons-mix-is-out-of-whack/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:45:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Land]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25605</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Pentagon must continue to tweak its weapons mix if it wants to meet the military challenges of this century, a study concludes.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/csba-our-weapons-mix-is-out-of-whack/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>55</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The intruder in your computer</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/the-intruder-in-your-computer/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/the-intruder-in-your-computer/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:49:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25593</guid> <description><![CDATA[A computer virus is targeting even DoD and government computers protected by Common Access Cards. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/the-intruder-in-your-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>DoD’s cyber fail-safe dilemma</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/15/dods-cyber-fail-safe-dilemma/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/15/dods-cyber-fail-safe-dilemma/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:11:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25107</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Pentagon says in a new report that it's ready to launch cyber-attacks, but only if so ordered by the president. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/15/dods-cyber-fail-safe-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>8</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>More calls to investigate GE’s China deal</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/14/more-calls-to-investigate-ges-china-deal/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/14/more-calls-to-investigate-ges-china-deal/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:26:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25094</guid> <description><![CDATA[Another House lawmaker is calling for an official Pentagon investigation into GE's partnership with China's state-owned aviation company.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/14/more-calls-to-investigate-ges-china-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>21</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SASC warns about fake electronic components</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/08/sasc-warns-about-fake-electronic-components/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/08/sasc-warns-about-fake-electronic-components/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:08:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25046</guid> <description><![CDATA[Senate lawmakers warned that thousands of fake Chinese-made components could be putting U.S. troops in danger.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/08/sasc-warns-about-fake-electronic-components/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>28</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Report details defense industry cyber attack</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/01/report-details-defense-industry-cyber-attack/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/01/report-details-defense-industry-cyber-attack/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:43:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=24967</guid> <description><![CDATA[Another report details the efforts of foreign hackers to try to steal secrets from U.S. defense contractors. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/01/report-details-defense-industry-cyber-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>WH proclaims ‘cyber-security awareness month’</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/10/03/wh-proclaims-cyber-security-awareness-month/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/10/03/wh-proclaims-cyber-security-awareness-month/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=24607</guid> <description><![CDATA[President Obama wants Americans to devote October to learning about and discussing cyber-security. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/10/03/wh-proclaims-cyber-security-awareness-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>DoD expands cyber-protection pilot</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/09/26/dod-expands-cyber-protection-pilot/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/09/26/dod-expands-cyber-protection-pilot/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:32:29 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=24540</guid> <description><![CDATA[After months of stories about enduring cyber-intrusions, the government could be making progress. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/09/26/dod-expands-cyber-protection-pilot/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cry #havoc! And let slip the Tweets of war</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/09/15/cry-havoc-and-let-slip-the-tweets-of-war/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/09/15/cry-havoc-and-let-slip-the-tweets-of-war/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:52:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=24382</guid> <description><![CDATA[Even Twitter has become a venue for battles, of a sort, in today's unconventional, asymmetrical high-tech conflicts. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/09/15/cry-havoc-and-let-slip-the-tweets-of-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Is a ‘cyber 9/11′ inevitable?</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/09/12/is-a-cyber-911-inevitable/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/09/12/is-a-cyber-911-inevitable/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=24338</guid> <description><![CDATA[Will government and industry officials heed the drumbeat of warnings about U.S. cyber-unpreparedness? ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/09/12/is-a-cyber-911-inevitable/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>13</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>DoD grapples with smartphone, tablet security</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/29/dod-grapples-with-smartphone-tablet-security/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/29/dod-grapples-with-smartphone-tablet-security/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:59:32 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=24188</guid> <description><![CDATA[DoD's network security officials want service members and workers to use the latest devices -- but very carefully.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/29/dod-grapples-with-smartphone-tablet-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Betting on the next wave of cyber-security</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/25/betting-on-the-next-wave-of-cyber-security/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/25/betting-on-the-next-wave-of-cyber-security/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:13:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=24147</guid> <description><![CDATA[A top computer security provider hopes it has the answer to the next big wave of cyber-security threats. Will it work?]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/25/betting-on-the-next-wave-of-cyber-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Report: Chinese TV doc reveals cyber-mischief</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/22/report-chinese-tv-doc-reveals-cyber-mischief/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/22/report-chinese-tv-doc-reveals-cyber-mischief/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=24104</guid> <description><![CDATA[A report says China may have inadvertently offered proof of its cyber-aggressiveness even as it tried to cast blame elsewhere.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/22/report-chinese-tv-doc-reveals-cyber-mischief/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>16</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>DoD: ‘Terabytes’ of data lost to cyber snooping</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/16/dod-terabytes-of-data-lost-to-cyber-snooping/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/16/dod-terabytes-of-data-lost-to-cyber-snooping/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 20:30:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=24017</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Pentagon's number 2 leader announced a "cyber-pilot" program in which DoD, other government agencies and contractors will joint forces on cyber-defense. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/16/dod-terabytes-of-data-lost-to-cyber-snooping/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>China: Hey, we’re cyber-victims too</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/10/china-hey-were-cyber-victims-too/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/10/china-hey-were-cyber-victims-too/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:56:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=23933</guid> <description><![CDATA[A report from Beijing says China endured nearly half a million cyber-attacks last year, but most of them apparently didn't originate where you might think. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/10/china-hey-were-cyber-victims-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Ongoing cyber-attack didn’t target military, officials say</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/04/ongoing-cyber-attack-didnt-target-military-officials-say/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/04/ongoing-cyber-attack-didnt-target-military-officials-say/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:56:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=23839</guid> <description><![CDATA[DoD has acknowledged its cyber-woes, but says it doesn't think it was a main target of the ongoing cyber attack announced this week.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/04/ongoing-cyber-attack-didnt-target-military-officials-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>8</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>DoD launches dedicated cyber-strategy website</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/07/25/dod-launches-dedicated-cyber-strategy-website/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/07/25/dod-launches-dedicated-cyber-strategy-website/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:26:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=23652</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Pentagon wants to get all its cyber-matters into one convenient place online, but its focus still is exclusively on defense, with nary a peep about its own offensive or snooping capabilities. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/07/25/dod-launches-dedicated-cyber-strategy-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Tie Future Budgets to Strategy</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/07/14/tie-future-budgets-to-strategy/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/07/14/tie-future-budgets-to-strategy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:58:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Land]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Space]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=23510</guid> <description><![CDATA[With more rounds of defense spending cuts looming, the Pentagon must choose which roles and missions are a top priority and which ones aren't important as it drafts future budgets; a move that will no doubt entail risk and the usual round of 'painful choices,' a pair of think tankers advised lawmakers and their staff today on Capitol Hill.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/07/14/tie-future-budgets-to-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>34</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Do the U.S. and China need a ‘cyber détente’?</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/28/do-the-u-s-and-china-need-a-cyber-detente/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/28/do-the-u-s-and-china-need-a-cyber-detente/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:00:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=23222</guid> <description><![CDATA[Should the U.S. and China pursue a cyber-accord before their explorations of each other's networks get out of hand? ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/28/do-the-u-s-and-china-need-a-cyber-detente/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/94 queries in 0.156 seconds using apc
Object Caching 1146/1342 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 00:18:48 -->
