<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>DoD Buzz &#187; Naval</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/category/naval-warfare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>The Navy faces reality</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/02/08/the-navy-faces-reality/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/02/08/the-navy-faces-reality/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:52:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25729</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Navy's leadership is acknowledging its fleet will, at best, not grow in the near-term.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/02/08/the-navy-faces-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>26</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Va delegation pounces on Fla carrier move</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/02/02/va-delegation-pounces-on-fla-carrier-move/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/02/02/va-delegation-pounces-on-fla-carrier-move/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:54:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25690</guid> <description><![CDATA[Virginia says shrinking DoD budget growth means the Navy should scrap its plan to move a carrier. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/02/02/va-delegation-pounces-on-fla-carrier-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>26</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Report adds still more gloom to Navy ship outlook</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/report-adds-still-more-gloom-to-navy-ship-outlook/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/report-adds-still-more-gloom-to-navy-ship-outlook/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:37:19 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25614</guid> <description><![CDATA[GAO says it's going to take a lot of technical and budgetary problem-solving to field the Navy's next-model destroyer. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/report-adds-still-more-gloom-to-navy-ship-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>94</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>CSBA: Our weapons mix is ‘out of whack’</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/csba-our-weapons-mix-is-out-of-whack/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/csba-our-weapons-mix-is-out-of-whack/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:45:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Land]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25605</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Pentagon must continue to tweak its weapons mix if it wants to meet the military challenges of this century, a study concludes.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/24/csba-our-weapons-mix-is-out-of-whack/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>55</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Could Boeing give LCS more punch?</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/19/could-boeing-give-lcs-more-punch/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/19/could-boeing-give-lcs-more-punch/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:41:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25565</guid> <description><![CDATA[An advanced new missile could potentially mean big changes for the littoral combat ship. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/19/could-boeing-give-lcs-more-punch/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>101</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SNA: Analysts paint bleak picture of future Navy</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/12/sna-analysts-paint-bleak-picture-of-future-navy/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/12/sna-analysts-paint-bleak-picture-of-future-navy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:20:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25534</guid> <description><![CDATA[A trio of experts said that unless the Navy changes course, its fleet will continue to shrink, age and could become obsolete.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/12/sna-analysts-paint-bleak-picture-of-future-navy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>58</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SNA: The Navy’s happy warrior</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/12/sna-the-navys-happy-warrior/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/12/sna-the-navys-happy-warrior/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:24:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25530</guid> <description><![CDATA[Navy Undersecretary Bob Work said he was 'psyched' about the future and mocked skeptics of the service's plans.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/12/sna-the-navys-happy-warrior/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>16</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SNA: The Coast Guard’s cry for help</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/12/sna-the-coast-guards-cry-for-help/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/12/sna-the-coast-guards-cry-for-help/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:55:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25525</guid> <description><![CDATA[The commandant of the Coast Guard worries about realizing his plans for new large cutters.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/12/sna-the-coast-guards-cry-for-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>30</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SNA: Return of the phantom frigate</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/11/sna-return-of-the-phantom-frigate/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/11/sna-return-of-the-phantom-frigate/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:24:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25521</guid> <description><![CDATA[Huntington-Ingalls is not giving up on a naval export version of its Coast Guard cutter. Trouble is, does anyone want to buy one?]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/11/sna-return-of-the-phantom-frigate/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>28</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SNA: Sen Collins’ shipbuilding showdown</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/11/sna-sen-collins-shipbuilding-showdown/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/11/sna-sen-collins-shipbuilding-showdown/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:45:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25510</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Senate's biggest destroyer advocate questions the wisdom of the Navy's high-volume LCS strategy. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/11/sna-sen-collins-shipbuilding-showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>26</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SNA: CNO lays down his priorities</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/10/sna-cno-lays-down-his-priorities/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/10/sna-cno-lays-down-his-priorities/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:44:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25506</guid> <description><![CDATA[Adm. Greenert promised the Navy would keep focusing on key points even if it shrinks further.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/10/sna-cno-lays-down-his-priorities/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>8</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SNA: The Navy’s next LCS dilemma</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/10/sna-the-navys-next-lcs-dilemma/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/10/sna-the-navys-next-lcs-dilemma/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25501</guid> <description><![CDATA[The brass really, really wants the littoral combat ship to work, but it has more than acquisition hurdles to clear. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/10/sna-the-navys-next-lcs-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>77</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SNA: LM’s LCS enters its ‘cookie cutter’ phase</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/10/sna-lms-lcs-enters-its-cookie-cutter-phase/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/10/sna-lms-lcs-enters-its-cookie-cutter-phase/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:22:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25497</guid> <description><![CDATA[Lockheed officials say their LCS run is just getting into its stride, but there are a lot of other moving parts. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/10/sna-lms-lcs-enters-its-cookie-cutter-phase/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>20</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Revenge of the Gray Elephant</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/03/revenge-of-the-gray-elephant/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/03/revenge-of-the-gray-elephant/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:58:13 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25444</guid> <description><![CDATA[Reports say DDG 1000 could wind up a bargain compared to the Navy's other major shipbuilding plans. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/01/03/revenge-of-the-gray-elephant/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>108</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Lockheed, Boeing battle for future of Aegis</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/12/14/lockheed-boeing-battle-for-future-of-aegis/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/12/14/lockheed-boeing-battle-for-future-of-aegis/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:12:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25298</guid> <description><![CDATA[The defense titans both want the job of helping the Navy upgrade its signature combat system.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/12/14/lockheed-boeing-battle-for-future-of-aegis/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>20</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Marines train for big at-sea takedowns</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/12/08/marines-train-for-big-at-sea-takedowns/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/12/08/marines-train-for-big-at-sea-takedowns/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:50:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25264</guid> <description><![CDATA[Marines and sailors want to keep proficient at quickly boarding and stopping suspect ships.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/12/08/marines-train-for-big-at-sea-takedowns/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>103</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Alaska appeals for icebreakers</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/12/01/alaska-appeals-for-icebreakers/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/12/01/alaska-appeals-for-icebreakers/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:36:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25224</guid> <description><![CDATA[A state leader says the Coast Guard must catch up in its response to the melting Arctic]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/12/01/alaska-appeals-for-icebreakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>58</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The future is here: EMALS launches F-35</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/28/the-future-is-here-emals-launches-f-35/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/28/the-future-is-here-emals-launches-f-35/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:16:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25180</guid> <description><![CDATA[Two great navies breathe a little easier as two key systems show they can play nice together.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/28/the-future-is-here-emals-launches-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>15</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Report: Cost spike for Navy’s next DDGs</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/16/report-cost-spike-for-navys-next-ddgs/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/16/report-cost-spike-for-navys-next-ddgs/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:51:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25130</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Navy could pay almost double for a new ship originally planned as a way to save money.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/16/report-cost-spike-for-navys-next-ddgs/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>50</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Deploying amphibs look a lot like the future</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/15/deploying-amphibs-look-a-lot-like-the-future/</link> <comments>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/15/deploying-amphibs-look-a-lot-like-the-future/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:21:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Philip Ewing</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=25100</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Navy's newest big gator heads across the Pacific in a symbol of the new U.S. strategic focus. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/15/deploying-amphibs-look-a-lot-like-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>15</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/18 queries in 0.024 seconds using apc
Object Caching 1177/1201 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 00:16:05 -->
